140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28043001)
1. Flow cytometry for immediate follow-up of drinking water networks after maintenance.
Van Nevel S; Buysschaert B; De Roy K; De Gusseme B; Clement L; Boon N
Water Res; 2017 Mar; 111():66-73. PubMed ID: 28043001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flow cytometric bacterial cell counts challenge conventional heterotrophic plate counts for routine microbiological drinking water monitoring.
Van Nevel S; Koetzsch S; Proctor CR; Besmer MD; Prest EI; Vrouwenvelder JS; Knezev A; Boon N; Hammes F
Water Res; 2017 Apr; 113():191-206. PubMed ID: 28214393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combining flow cytometry and 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing: a promising approach for drinking water monitoring and characterization.
Prest EI; El-Chakhtoura J; Hammes F; Saikaly PE; van Loosdrecht MC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2014 Oct; 63():179-89. PubMed ID: 25000200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methods for microbiological quality assessment in drinking water: a comparative study.
Helmi K; Barthod F; Méheut G; Henry A; Poty F; Laurent F; Charni-Ben-Tabassi N
J Water Health; 2015 Mar; 13(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 25719463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-Term Bacterial Dynamics in a Full-Scale Drinking Water Distribution System.
Prest EI; Weissbrodt DG; Hammes F; van Loosdrecht MC; Vrouwenvelder JS
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164445. PubMed ID: 27792739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monitoring microbiological changes in drinking water systems using a fast and reproducible flow cytometric method.
Prest EI; Hammes F; Kötzsch S; van Loosdrecht MC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2013 Dec; 47(19):7131-42. PubMed ID: 24183559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of biofilm cell quantification methods for drinking water distribution systems.
Waller SA; Packman AI; Hausner M
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():8-21. PubMed ID: 29111400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biological instability in a chlorinated drinking water distribution network.
Nescerecka A; Rubulis J; Vital M; Juhna T; Hammes F
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96354. PubMed ID: 24796923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The bacteriological composition of biomass recovered by flushing an operational drinking water distribution system.
Douterelo I; Husband S; Boxall JB
Water Res; 2014 May; 54():100-14. PubMed ID: 24565801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Indoor Heating Drives Water Bacterial Growth and Community Metabolic Profile Changes in Building Tap Pipes during the Winter Season.
Zhang HH; Chen SN; Huang TL; Shang PL; Yang X; Ma WX
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Oct; 12(10):13649-61. PubMed ID: 26516885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Flow-cytometric total bacterial cell counts as a descriptive microbiological parameter for drinking water treatment processes.
Hammes F; Berney M; Wang Y; Vital M; Köster O; Egli T
Water Res; 2008 Jan; 42(1-2):269-77. PubMed ID: 17659762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A microbiology-based multi-parametric approach towards assessing biological stability in drinking water distribution networks.
Lautenschlager K; Hwang C; Liu WT; Boon N; Köster O; Vrouwenvelder H; Egli T; Hammes F
Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(9):3015-25. PubMed ID: 23557697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing flow cytometry with culture-based methods for microbial monitoring and as a diagnostic tool for assessing drinking water treatment processes.
Cheswick R; Cartmell E; Lee S; Upton A; Weir P; Moore G; Nocker A; Jefferson B; Jarvis P
Environ Int; 2019 Sep; 130():104893. PubMed ID: 31226555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Domestic hot-water boilers harbour active thermophilic bacterial communities distinctly different from those in the cold-water supply.
Egli T; Campostrini L; Leifels M; Füchslin HP; Kolm C; Dan C; Zimmermann S; Hauss V; Guiller A; Grasso L; Shajkofci A; Farnleitner AH; Kirschner AKT
Water Res; 2024 Apr; 253():121109. PubMed ID: 38377920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamics of bacterial communities before and after distribution in a full-scale drinking water network.
El-Chakhtoura J; Prest E; Saikaly P; van Loosdrecht M; Hammes F; Vrouwenvelder H
Water Res; 2015 May; 74():180-90. PubMed ID: 25732558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flow cytometry for fast microbial community fingerprinting.
De Roy K; Clement L; Thas O; Wang Y; Boon N
Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(3):907-19. PubMed ID: 22192760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Modern Drinking Water Network Maintenance Methods: Evaluation of Removed Deposits in the Form of Total Suspended Solids (TSS).
Jurek Vidlářová P; Heviánková S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(8):. PubMed ID: 33921692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Overnight stagnation of drinking water in household taps induces microbial growth and changes in community composition.
Lautenschlager K; Boon N; Wang Y; Egli T; Hammes F
Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(17):4868-77. PubMed ID: 20696451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing microbiological water quality in drinking water distribution systems with disinfectant residual using flow cytometry.
Gillespie S; Lipphaus P; Green J; Parsons S; Weir P; Juskowiak K; Jefferson B; Jarvis P; Nocker A
Water Res; 2014 Nov; 65():224-34. PubMed ID: 25123436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of microbial disturbances in a drinking water microbial community through continuous acquisition and advanced analysis of flow cytometry data.
Props R; Rubbens P; Besmer M; Buysschaert B; Sigrist J; Weilenmann H; Waegeman W; Boon N; Hammes F
Water Res; 2018 Nov; 145():73-82. PubMed ID: 30121434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
