These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis]. Zencica P; Chaloupka R; HladĂková J; Krbec M Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of surgical level on self-reported clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: L4-L5 versus L5-S1. Lawton CD; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Dahdaleh NS; Wong AP; Khanna R; Barnawi A; Fessler RG World Neurosurg; 2014 Jan; 81(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 23916495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes? Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a prospective study of complications. Malham GM; Parker RM; Ellis NJ; Blecher CM; Chow FY; Claydon MH J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):851-60. PubMed ID: 25279655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients. Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C; J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical outcomes of two minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases. Tian Y; Liu X Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Oct; 26(7):745-51. PubMed ID: 26943871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of TLIF with rhBMP-2 versus no TLIF and higher posterolateral rhBMP-2 dose at L5-S1 for long fusions to the sacrum with sacropelvic fixation in patients with primary adult deformity. Rahman RK; Buchowski JM; Stephens B; Dorward IG; Koester LA; Bridwell KH Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):2264-71. PubMed ID: 24108280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Facet Joint Fixation and Anterior, Direct Lateral, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disc Diseases: Retrospective Cohort Study of a New Minimally Invasive Technique. Belykh E; Kalinin AA; Martirosyan NL; Kerimbayev T; Theodore N; Preul MC; Byvaltsev VA World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e959-e968. PubMed ID: 29588241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Circumferential fusion: a comparative analysis between anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis. Tye EY; Tanenbaum JE; Alonso AS; Xiao R; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Savage JW Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):464-471. PubMed ID: 28821444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients. Wong AP; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Lawton CD; Dahdaleh NS; Wong RH; Auffinger B; Lam S; Song JK; Liu JC; Koski TR; Fessler RG J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 25700243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization and fusion surgery in the treatment of radiographic adjacent-segment degeneration: a retrospective analysis of single L5-S1 degenerative spondylosis covering 4 years. Han Y; Sun J; Luo C; Huang S; Li L; Ji X; Duan X; Wang Z; Pi G J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):706-712. PubMed ID: 27341057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Fan G; Wu X; Yu S; Sun Q; Guan X; Zhang H; Gu X; He S Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():9540298. PubMed ID: 27747244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lumbar-sacral fusion by a combined approach using interbody PEEK cage and posterior pedicle-screw fixation: clinical and radiological results from a prospective study. Boissiere L; Perrin G; Rigal J; Michel F; Barrey C Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):945-51. PubMed ID: 24183744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-year postoperative outcomes between MIS and conventional TLIF in1-segment lumbar disc herniation. Lv Y; Chen J; Chen J; Wu Y; Chen X; Liu Y; Chu Z; Sheng L; Qin R; Chen M Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2017 Jun; 26(3):168-176. PubMed ID: 28084155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS AND CHANGE OF SAGITTAL SPINO-PELVIC PARAMETERS BETWEEN MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL AND CONVENTIONAL OPEN POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSIONS IN TREATMENT OF LOW-DEGREE ISTHMIC LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS]. Sun X; Zeng R; Li G; Wei B; Hu Z; Lin H; Chen G; Chen S; Sun J Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 29(12):1504-9. PubMed ID: 27044219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]