These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28044073)

  • 1. Stimulator Selection in SSVEP-Based Spatial Selective Attention Study.
    Xie S; Liu C; Obermayer K; Zhu F; Wang L; Xie X; Wang W
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2016; 2016():6410718. PubMed ID: 28044073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual spatial attention tracking using high-density SSVEP data for independent brain-computer communication.
    Kelly SP; Lalor EC; Reilly RB; Foxe JJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Jun; 13(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 16003896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency recognition in an SSVEP-based brain computer interface using empirical mode decomposition and refined generalized zero-crossing.
    Wu CH; Chang HC; Lee PL; Li KS; Sie JJ; Sun CW; Yang CY; Li PH; Deng HT; Shyu KK
    J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Mar; 196(1):170-81. PubMed ID: 21194547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulator selection in SSVEP-based BCI.
    Wu Z; Lai Y; Xia Y; Wu D; Yao D
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Oct; 30(8):1079-88. PubMed ID: 18316226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of stimulation frequency and stimulation waveform on steady-state visual evoked potentials using a computer monitor.
    Chen X; Wang Y; Zhang S; Xu S; Gao X
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Oct; 16(6):066007. PubMed ID: 31220820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of spatial selective attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential in the 20-28 Hz range.
    Müller MM; Picton TW; Valdes-Sosa P; Riera J; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Hillyard SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1998 Apr; 6(4):249-61. PubMed ID: 9593922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring the temporal dynamics of sustained and transient spatial attention using steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Zhang D; Hong B; Gao S; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1575-1591. PubMed ID: 28258437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of illusory contours forms intermodulation responses of steady state visual evoked potentials as a neural signature of spatial integration.
    Gundlach C; Müller MM
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 23665197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural dynamics during repetitive visual stimulation.
    Tsoneva T; Garcia-Molina G; Desain P
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Dec; 12(6):066017. PubMed ID: 26479469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing.
    Andersen SK; Fuchs S; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19702461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Competitive interactions of attentional resources in early visual cortex during sustained visuospatial attention within or between visual hemifields: evidence for the different-hemifield advantage.
    Walter S; Quigley C; Mueller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 May; 26(5):938-54. PubMed ID: 24345166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring steady-state visual evoked potentials as an index for intermodal and crossmodal spatial attention.
    Zhang D; Hong B; Gao X; Gao S; Röder B
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):665-75. PubMed ID: 20874752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency-modulated steady-state visual evoked potentials: a new stimulation method for brain-computer interfaces.
    Dreyer AM; Herrmann CS
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Feb; 241():1-9. PubMed ID: 25522824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliance on visual attention during visuomotor adaptation: an SSVEP study.
    Reuter EM; Bednark J; Cunnington R
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 233(7):2041-51. PubMed ID: 25893908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Keeping focused: sustained spatial selective visual attention is maintained in healthy old age.
    Quigley C; Andersen SK; Müller MM
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1469():24-34. PubMed ID: 22765915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards an independent brain-computer interface using steady state visual evoked potentials.
    Allison BZ; McFarland DJ; Schalk G; Zheng SD; Jackson MM; Wolpaw JR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 119(2):399-408. PubMed ID: 18077208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sustained Splits of Attention within versus across Visual Hemifields Produce Distinct Spatial Gain Profiles.
    Walter S; Keitel C; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 28(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 26401813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concurrent recording of steady-state and transient event-related potentials as indices of visual-spatial selective attention.
    Müller MM; Hillyard S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Sep; 111(9):1544-52. PubMed ID: 10964063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Customized stimulation enhances performance of independent binary SSVEP-BCIs.
    Lopez-Gordo MA; Prieto A; Pelayo F; Morillas C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Jan; 122(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 20573542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Steady-state visual evoked potentials: distributed local sources and wave-like dynamics are sensitive to flicker frequency.
    Srinivasan R; Bibi FA; Nunez PL
    Brain Topogr; 2006; 18(3):167-87. PubMed ID: 16544207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.