621 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28044325)
1. Robust treatment planning with conditional value at risk chance constraints in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
An Y; Liang J; Schild SE; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 28044325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel and individualized robust optimization method using normalized dose interval volume constraints (NDIVC) for intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy.
Shan J; Sio TT; Liu C; Schild SE; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):382-393. PubMed ID: 30387870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robust intensity-modulated proton therapy to reduce high linear energy transfer in organs at risk.
An Y; Shan J; Patel SH; Wong W; Schild SE; Ding X; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6138-6147. PubMed ID: 28976574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical Note: Treatment planning system (TPS) approximations matter - comparing intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan quality and robustness between a commercial and an in-house developed TPS for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Liu C; Yu NY; Shan J; Bhangoo RS; Daniels TB; Chiang JS; Ding X; Lara P; Patrick CL; Archuleta JP; DeWees T; Hu Y; Schild SE; Bues M; Sio TT; Liu W
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4755-4762. PubMed ID: 31498885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mixed integer programming with dose-volume constraints in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Zhang P; Fan N; Shan J; Schild SE; Bues M; Liu W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):29-35. PubMed ID: 28681976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robust optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy with soft spot sensitivity regularization.
Gu W; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Zou W; Dong L; Tsai MY; Jia X; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1408-1425. PubMed ID: 30570164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) interplay effect evaluation of asymmetric breathing with simultaneous uncertainty considerations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Shan J; Yang Y; Schild SE; Daniels TB; Wong WW; Fatyga M; Bues M; Sio TT; Liu W
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5428-5440. PubMed ID: 32964474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.
Liu W; Zhang X; Li Y; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1079-91. PubMed ID: 22320818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
Sayre GA; Ruan D
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robust mixed electron-photon radiation therapy optimization.
Renaud MA; Serban M; Seuntjens J
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1384-1396. PubMed ID: 30628079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Spot Size and Spacing on the Quality of Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Lung Cancer.
Liu C; Schild SE; Chang JY; Liao Z; Korte S; Shen J; Ding X; Hu Y; Kang Y; Keole SR; Sio TT; Wong WW; Sahoo N; Bues M; Liu W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jun; 101(2):479-489. PubMed ID: 29550033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PTV-based VMAT vs. robust IMPT for head-and-neck cancer: A probabilistic uncertainty analysis of clinical plan evaluation with the Dutch model-based selection.
Rojo-Santiago J; Korevaar E; Perkó Z; Both S; Habraken SJM; Hoogeman MS
Radiother Oncol; 2023 Sep; 186():109729. PubMed ID: 37301261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy to account for anatomy changes in lung cancer patients.
Li H; Zhang X; Park P; Liu W; Chang J; Liao Z; Frank S; Li Y; Poenisch F; Mohan R; Gillin M; Zhu R
Radiother Oncol; 2015 Mar; 114(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 25708992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Chen W; Unkelbach J; Trofimov A; Madden T; Kooy H; Bortfeld T; Craft D
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(3):591-608. PubMed ID: 22222720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploratory Study of 4D versus 3D Robust Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.
Liu W; Schild SE; Chang JY; Liao Z; Chang YH; Wen Z; Shen J; Stoker JB; Ding X; Hu Y; Sahoo N; Herman MG; Vargas C; Keole S; Wong W; Bues M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):523-533. PubMed ID: 26725727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robust optimization to reduce the impact of biological effect variation from physical uncertainties in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Bai X; Lim G; Grosshans D; Mohan R; Cao W
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025004. PubMed ID: 30523932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multi-scenario based robust intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans can account for set-up errors more effectively in terms of normal tissue sparing than planning target volume (PTV) based intensity-modulated photon plans in the head and neck region.
Stuschke M; Kaiser A; Abu Jawad J; Pöttgen C; Levegrün S; Farr J
Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun; 8():145. PubMed ID: 23773560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
