These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28045276)

  • 21. Distinct information critically distinguishes judgments of face familiarity and identity.
    Smith ML; Volna B; Ewing L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1770-1779. PubMed ID: 27379874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A familiarity disadvantage for remembering specific images of faces.
    Armann RG; Jenkins R; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):571-80. PubMed ID: 26594877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Face-selective regions show invariance to linear, but not to non-linear, changes in facial images.
    Baseler HA; Young AW; Jenkins R; Mike Burton A; Andrews TJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):76-84. PubMed ID: 27729230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implicit self-other discrimination affects the interplay between multisensory affordances of mental representations of faces.
    Zeugin D; Arfa N; Notter M; Murray MM; Ionta S
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Aug; 333():282-285. PubMed ID: 28697903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Finding an unfamiliar face in a line-up: Viewing multiple images of the target is beneficial on target-present trials but costly on target-absent trials.
    Matthews CM; Mondloch CJ
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Nov; 109(4):758-776. PubMed ID: 29658990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Understanding face familiarity.
    Kramer RSS; Young AW; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():46-58. PubMed ID: 29232594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Unfamiliar Face Matching With Frontal and Profile Views.
    Kramer RSS; Reynolds MG
    Perception; 2018 Apr; 47(4):414-431. PubMed ID: 29402154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Are We Face Experts?
    Young AW; Burton AM
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2018 Feb; 22(2):100-110. PubMed ID: 29254899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interactive processes in matching identity and expressions of unfamiliar faces: evidence for mutual facilitation effects.
    Levy Y; Bentin S
    Perception; 2008; 37(6):915-30. PubMed ID: 18686710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attention to internal face features in unfamiliar face matching.
    Fletcher KI; Butavicius MA; Lee MD
    Br J Psychol; 2008 Aug; 99(Pt 3):379-94. PubMed ID: 17706001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Feature instructions improve face-matching accuracy.
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193455. PubMed ID: 29543822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. These two are different. Yes, they're the same: Choice blindness for facial identity.
    Sauerland M; Sagana A; Siegmann K; Heiligers D; Merckelbach H; Jenkins R
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 Feb; 40():93-104. PubMed ID: 26774209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contributions of feature shapes and surface cues to the recognition and neural representation of facial identity.
    Andrews TJ; Baseler H; Jenkins R; Burton AM; Young AW
    Cortex; 2016 Oct; 83():280-91. PubMed ID: 27636006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. From Parts to Identity: Invariance and Sensitivity of Face Representations to Different Face Halves.
    Anzellotti S; Caramazza A
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 May; 26(5):1900-9. PubMed ID: 25628344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Revisiting the earliest electrophysiological correlate of familiar face recognition.
    Huang W; Wu X; Hu L; Wang L; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Oct; 120():42-53. PubMed ID: 28684327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Camera-to-subject distance affects face configuration and perceived identity.
    Noyes E; Jenkins R
    Cognition; 2017 Aug; 165():97-104. PubMed ID: 28527319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Smiles in face matching: Idiosyncratic information revealed through a smile improves unfamiliar face matching performance.
    Mileva M; Burton AM
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Nov; 109(4):799-811. PubMed ID: 29920996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: a comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli.
    Bennetts RJ; Kim J; Burke D; Brooks KR; Lucey S; Saragih J; Robbins RA
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):950-70. PubMed ID: 24386715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Face matching impairment in developmental prosopagnosia.
    White D; Rivolta D; Burton AM; Al-Janabi S; Palermo R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Feb; 70(2):287-297. PubMed ID: 27042880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Deliberate disguise in face identification.
    Noyes E; Jenkins R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Jun; 25(2):280-290. PubMed ID: 30730157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.