These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28045959)

  • 1. The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics.
    Halpin CG; Skelhorn J; Rowe C; Ruxton GD; Higginson AD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169043. PubMed ID: 28045959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increased predation of nutrient-enriched aposematic prey.
    Halpin CG; Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Apr; 281(1781):20133255. PubMed ID: 24598424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predators' decisions to eat defended prey depend on the size of undefended prey.
    Halpin CG; Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Anim Behav; 2013 Jun; 85(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 23814280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predators' toxin burdens influence their strategic decisions to eat toxic prey.
    Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Curr Biol; 2007 Sep; 17(17):1479-83. PubMed ID: 17716896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The benefits of being toxic to deter predators depends on prey body size.
    Smith KE; Halpin CG; Rowe C
    Behav Ecol; 2016; 27(6):1650-1655. PubMed ID: 28028378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mimicry among Unequally Defended Prey Should Be Mutualistic When Predators Sample Optimally.
    Aubier TG; Joron M; Sherratt TN
    Am Nat; 2017 Mar; 189(3):267-282. PubMed ID: 28221836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mimicry between unequally defended prey can be parasitic: evidence for quasi-Batesian mimicry.
    Rowland HM; Mappes J; Ruxton GD; Speed MP
    Ecol Lett; 2010 Dec; 13(12):1494-502. PubMed ID: 20955507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disentangling taste and toxicity in aposematic prey.
    Holen ØH
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Feb; 280(1753):20122588. PubMed ID: 23256198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. State-Dependent Decision-Making by Predators and Its Consequences for Mimicry.
    Aubier TG; Sherratt TN
    Am Nat; 2020 Nov; 196(5):E127-E144. PubMed ID: 33064589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between sympatric defended species depends upon predators' discriminatory behaviour.
    Halpin CG; Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e44895. PubMed ID: 22970323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Body size matters for aposematic prey during predator aversion learning.
    Smith KE; Halpin CG; Rowe C
    Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():173-9. PubMed ID: 25256160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of alternative prey on the dynamics of imperfect Batesian and Müllerian mimicries.
    Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
    Evolution; 2004 Jun; 58(6):1294-302. PubMed ID: 15266978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Better the devil you know: avian predators find variation in prey toxicity aversive.
    Barnett CA; Bateson M; Rowe C
    Biol Lett; 2014 Nov; 10(11):20140533. PubMed ID: 25392317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating Müllerian mimicry: predator learning and variation in prey defences.
    Ihalainen E; Lindström L; Mappes J
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Mar; 20(2):780-91. PubMed ID: 17305843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Birds learn to use distastefulness as a signal of toxicity.
    Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Jun; 277(1688):1729-34. PubMed ID: 20129989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal-foraging predator favors commensalistic Batesian mimicry.
    Honma A; Takakura K; Nishida T
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3411. PubMed ID: 18923676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why aren't warning signals everywhere? On the prevalence of aposematism and mimicry in communities.
    Kikuchi DW; Herberstein ME; Barfield M; Holt RD; Mappes J
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2021 Dec; 96(6):2446-2460. PubMed ID: 34128583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prey defence phenotype mediates multiple-predator effects in tri-trophic food webs.
    Guariento RD; Dalponti G; Carneiro LS; Caliman A
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Oct; 91(10):2023-2036. PubMed ID: 35839141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effect of Predator Population Dynamics on Batesian Mimicry Complexes.
    Kikuchi DW; Barfield M; Herberstein ME; Mappes J; Holt RD
    Am Nat; 2022 Mar; 199(3):406-419. PubMed ID: 35175899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey.
    Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Feb; 268(1465):357-61. PubMed ID: 11270431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.