250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28046150)
1. Increased expressions of genes and proteins involved in mitochondrial oxidation and antioxidant pathway in adipose tissue of pigs selected for a low residual feed intake.
Louveau I; Vincent A; Tacher S; Gilbert H; Gondret F
J Anim Sci; 2016 Dec; 94(12):5042-5054. PubMed ID: 28046150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A transcriptome multi-tissue analysis identifies biological pathways and genes associated with variations in feed efficiency of growing pigs.
Gondret F; Vincent A; Houée-Bigot M; Siegel A; Lagarrigue S; Causeur D; Gilbert H; Louveau I
BMC Genomics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):244. PubMed ID: 28327084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Divergent selection for residual feed intake affects the transcriptomic and proteomic profiles of pig skeletal muscle.
Vincent A; Louveau I; Gondret F; Tréfeu C; Gilbert H; Lefaucheur L
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2745-58. PubMed ID: 26115262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Post-weaning blood transcriptomic differences between Yorkshire pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Liu H; Nguyen YT; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC; Tuggle CK
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():73. PubMed ID: 26801403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metabolic changes and tissue responses to selection on residual feed intake in growing pigs.
Le Naou T; Le Floc'h N; Louveau I; Gilbert H; Gondret F
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4771-80. PubMed ID: 22871936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of inflammation stimulation on energy and nutrient utilization in piglets selected for low and high residual feed intake.
Labussière E; Dubois S; Gilbert H; Thibault JN; Le Floc'h N; Noblet J; van Milgen J
Animal; 2015 Oct; 9(10):1653-61. PubMed ID: 26381577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of potential serum biomarkers to predict feed efficiency in young pigs.
Grubbs JK; Dekkers JC; Huff-Lonergan E; Tuggle CK; Lonergan SM
J Anim Sci; 2016 Apr; 94(4):1482-92. PubMed ID: 27136007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Difference in short-term responses to a high-fiber diet in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Montagne L; Loisel F; Le Naou T; Gondret F; Gilbert H; Le Gall M
J Anim Sci; 2014 Apr; 92(4):1512-23. PubMed ID: 24496835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gene expression profiling of the short-term adaptive response to acute caloric restriction in liver and adipose tissues of pigs differing in feed efficiency.
Lkhagvadorj S; Qu L; Cai W; Couture OP; Barb CR; Hausman GJ; Nettleton D; Anderson LL; Dekkers JC; Tuggle CK
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2010 Feb; 298(2):R494-507. PubMed ID: 19939971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tissue-specific responses of antioxidant pathways to poor hygiene conditions in growing pigs divergently selected for feed efficiency.
Sierżant K; Perruchot MH; Merlot E; Le Floc'h N; Gondret F
BMC Vet Res; 2019 Oct; 15(1):341. PubMed ID: 31619228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Whole Blood Transcriptomics Is Relevant to Identify Molecular Changes in Response to Genetic Selection for Feed Efficiency and Nutritional Status in the Pig.
Jégou M; Gondret F; Vincent A; Tréfeu C; Gilbert H; Louveau I
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146550. PubMed ID: 26752050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Energy utilization in pigs selected for high and low residual feed intake.
Barea R; Dubois S; Gilbert H; Sellier P; van Milgen J; Noblet J
J Anim Sci; 2010 Jun; 88(6):2062-72. PubMed ID: 20154162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved nutrient digestibility and retention partially explains feed efficiency gains in pigs selected for low residual feed intake.
Harris AJ; Patience JF; Lonergan SM; J M Dekkers C; Gabler NK
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90 Suppl 4():164-6. PubMed ID: 23365317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Composition and quality characteristics of carcasses from pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake on high- or low-energy diets.
Arkfeld EK; Young JM; Johnson RC; Fedler CA; Prusa K; Patience JF; Dekkers JC; Gabler NK; Lonergan SM; Huff-Lonergan E
J Anim Sci; 2015 May; 93(5):2530-45. PubMed ID: 26020348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using quantile regression methodology to evaluate changes in the shape of growth curves in pigs selected for increased feed efficiency based on residual feed intake.
Nascimento M; Nascimento ACC; Dekkers JCM; Serão NVL
Animal; 2019 May; 13(5):1009-1019. PubMed ID: 30306885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing peripheral blood cell profile of Yorkshire pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Mpetile Z; Young JM; Gabler NK; Dekkers JC; Tuggle CK
J Anim Sci; 2015 Mar; 93(3):892-9. PubMed ID: 26020867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metabolic response to an inflammatory challenge in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Merlot E; Gilbert H; Le Floc'h N
J Anim Sci; 2016 Feb; 94(2):563-73. PubMed ID: 27065126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phenotypic and genetic relationships between growth and feed intake curves and feed efficiency and amino acid requirements in the growing pig.
Saintilan R; Brossard L; Vautier B; Sellier P; Bidanel J; van Milgen J; Gilbert H
Animal; 2015 Jan; 9(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 25192352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transcriptome analysis of adipose tissue from pigs divergent in feed efficiency reveals alteration in gene networks related to adipose growth, lipid metabolism, extracellular matrix, and immune response.
Horodyska J; Reyer H; Wimmers K; Trakooljul N; Lawlor PG; Hamill RM
Mol Genet Genomics; 2019 Apr; 294(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 30483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of ad libitum and restricted feed intake on growth performance and body composition of Yorkshire pigs selected for reduced residual feed intake.
Boddicker N; Gabler NK; Spurlock ME; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC
J Anim Sci; 2011 Jan; 89(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 20833771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
