These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2804843)

  • 21. The expression "proof" is often misused by reviewers and authors.
    Versprille A
    Intensive Care Med; 1997 Jan; 23(1):131-2. PubMed ID: 9037659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How a submitted manuscript is processed.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Sep; 50(9):853-5; quiz 856. PubMed ID: 19787169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Program descriptions: information for authors and peer reviewers.
    Huston P; Elmslie T
    CMAJ; 1996 Oct; 155(8):1069-74. PubMed ID: 8873635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mastering verb tenses in literature reviews.
    Johnson SH
    Nurse Author Ed; 2004; 14(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 14735767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Manuscript revisions: the team approach.
    Ohler L
    Nurse Author Ed; 2002; 12(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 11928172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reviewing and writing articles for SCS.
    Bergbom I; Lepp M
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2010 Mar; 24(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 20470362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Problems faced by editors of peer reviewed medical journals.
    Jawaid SA
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S21-5. PubMed ID: 14968187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Editorial. Readers, writers and editors.
    J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1970 Nov; 36(11):389. PubMed ID: 5273745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part XII: responding to reviewers.
    Kotz D; Cals JW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 67(3):243. PubMed ID: 24411072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Publishing--part II.
    Vogt HB
    S D Med; 2007 Mar; 60(3):95, 97. PubMed ID: 17460850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Revision of manuscripts for scholarly publication.
    Dowd SB; McElveny C
    Radiol Technol; 1997; 69(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 9323765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Referees--science's watchdogs and authors best friends].
    Karlsson Y; Riis P; Nylenna M
    Nord Med; 1995; 110(5):162-5. PubMed ID: 7753609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Peer reviewer training and editor support: results from an international survey of nursing peer reviewers.
    Freda MC; Kearney MH; Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty M
    J Prof Nurs; 2009; 25(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 19306833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. "Outing" peer review: medical editors scrutinize the value of secrecy.
    Vanchieri C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Nov; 89(21):1568-9. PubMed ID: 9362150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
    Morton JP
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
    Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. We're glad you asked.
    Smoyak SA
    J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 1989 Oct; 27(10):3, 39. PubMed ID: 2795541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A peer review quality assurance program in drug information.
    Tierney M; Godbout L; Repchinsky C
    Can J Hosp Pharm; 1991 Feb; 44(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 10110041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development of a case report review instrument.
    Ramulu VG; Levine RB; Hebert RS; Wright SM
    Int J Clin Pract; 2005 Apr; 59(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 15853865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quality assessment of reviewers' reports using a simple instrument.
    Landkroon AP; Euser AM; Veeken H; Hart W; Overbeke AJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Oct; 108(4):979-85. PubMed ID: 17012462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.