BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28049561)

  • 21. Shaves off the Cavity or Specimen in Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer.
    Iwai Y; Prigoff JG; Sun L; Wiechmann L; Taback B; Rao R; Ugras SK
    J Surg Res; 2022 Sep; 277():296-302. PubMed ID: 35526391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interest in cavity shaving in breast conservative treatment does not depend on lumpectomy technique.
    Feron JG; Nguyen A; Bézu C; Antoine M; Darai E; Coutant C; Rouzier R; Uzan S
    Breast; 2011 Aug; 20(4):358-64. PubMed ID: 21324697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of introducing an in-theatre intra-operative specimen radiography (IOSR) system on the management of palpable breast cancer within a single unit.
    Layfield DM; May DJ; Cutress RI; Richardson C; Agrawal A; Wise M; Yiangou C
    Breast; 2012 Aug; 21(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 22119488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?
    Jacobson AF; Asad J; Boolbol SK; Osborne MP; Boachie-Adjei K; Feldman SM
    Am J Surg; 2008 Oct; 196(4):556-8. PubMed ID: 18809063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cost minimization in breast conserving surgery: a comparative study of radiofrequency spectroscopy and full cavity shave margins.
    Gilmore R; Chen J; Dembinski R; Reissis Y; Milek D; Cadena L; Habibi M
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2023 Sep; 21(1):66. PubMed ID: 37716980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of cavity margin shavings to ensure completeness of excision on local recurrence rates following breast conserving surgery.
    Barthelmes L; Al Awa A; Crawford DJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2003 Oct; 29(8):644-8. PubMed ID: 14511610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Separate cavity margins excision as a complement to conservative breast cancer surgery.
    Zavagno G; Donà M; Orvieto E; Mocellin S; Pasquali S; Goldin E; Mele ML; Belardinelli V; Nitti D
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jul; 36(7):632-8. PubMed ID: 20542659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reducing re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery with Margin Probe: systematic review.
    Rossou C; Alampritis G; Patel B
    Br J Surg; 2024 Jan; 111(1):. PubMed ID: 37991190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cavity Shaving plus Lumpectomy versus Lumpectomy Alone for Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Wang K; Ren Y; He J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0168705. PubMed ID: 28046058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A device for real-time, intraoperative margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery.
    Karni T; Pappo I; Sandbank J; Lavon O; Kent V; Spector R; Morgenstern S; Lelcuk S
    Am J Surg; 2007 Oct; 194(4):467-73. PubMed ID: 17826057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Conservative Surgery a Strategy to Reduce Positive Margins and Surgical Time.
    Vanni G; Pellicciaro M; Renelli G; Materazzo M; Sadri A; Marsella VE; Tacconi F; Bastone SA; Longo B; Di Mauro G; Cervelli V; Berretta M; Buonomo OC
    Curr Oncol; 2024 Jan; 31(1):511-520. PubMed ID: 38248120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic performance of a novel device for real-time margin assessment in lumpectomy specimens.
    Pappo I; Spector R; Schindel A; Morgenstern S; Sandbank J; Leider LT; Schneebaum S; Lelcuk S; Karni T
    J Surg Res; 2010 May; 160(2):277-81. PubMed ID: 19628225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lumpectomy specimen margins are not reliable in predicting residual disease in breast conserving surgery.
    Tang R; Coopey SB; Specht MC; Lei L; Gadd MA; Hughes KS; Brachtel EF; Smith BL
    Am J Surg; 2015 Jul; 210(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 25613784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intraoperative Margin Management in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
    Gray RJ; Pockaj BA; Garvey E; Blair S
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 28058560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intraoperative assessment of surgical margins during breast conserving surgery of ductal carcinoma in situ by use of radiofrequency spectroscopy.
    Thill M; Röder K; Diedrich K; Dittmer C
    Breast; 2011 Dec; 20(6):579-80. PubMed ID: 21885281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surgical management modifications following systematic additional shaving of cavity margins in breast-conservation treatment.
    Héquet D; Bricou A; Delpech Y; Barranger E
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 20628823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer.
    Coopey S; Smith BL; Hanson S; Buckley J; Hughes KS; Gadd M; Specht MC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3797-801. PubMed ID: 21630123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluating the impact of radiofrequency spectroscopy on reducing reoperations after breast conserving surgery: A meta-analysis.
    Wang J; Zhang L; Pan Z
    Thorac Cancer; 2023 Jun; 14(16):1413-1419. PubMed ID: 37073138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of cavity shaving on reoperation rate following breast-conserving surgery.
    Marudanayagam R; Singhal R; Tanchel B; O'Connor B; Balasubramanian B; Paterson I
    Breast J; 2008; 14(6):570-3. PubMed ID: 19000040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery.
    Weber S; Storm FK; Stitt J; Mahvi DM
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 9327150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.