138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28049561)
41. Minimizing re-excision after breast conserving surgery - a review of radiofrequency spectroscopy for real-time, intraoperative margin assessment.
Reid VJ; Falk JS; Police AM; Ridgeway CA; Cadena LL; Povoski SP
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2021 Nov; 18(11):1057-1068. PubMed ID: 34657525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Cavity shaving for invasive breast cancer conservative surgery: Reduced specimen volume and margin positive rates.
Mansilla-Polo M; Ruiz-Merino G; Marín-Rodríguez P; Iborra-Lacal E; Guzmán-Aroca F; M Servet Pérez de Lema C; Marín-Hernández C; Polo-García L; Piñero-Madrona A
Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101632. PubMed ID: 34274752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Defining the clinical target volume for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and accelerated partial breast irradiation: a pathologic analysis.
Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):722-30. PubMed ID: 15465188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Radiofrequency spectroscopy with intraoperative pathological assessment for breast carcinoma: synergistic or redundant?
Qafiti F; Layton C; McDonald KA
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2022 Apr; 19(4):369-373. PubMed ID: 35531775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Predictive factors for residual disease in re-excision specimens after breast-conserving surgery.
Atalay C; Irkkan C
Breast J; 2012; 18(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 22616572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Sampling of secondary margins decreases the need for re-excision after partial mastectomy.
Guidroz JA; Larrieux G; Liao J; Sugg SL; Scott-Conner CE; Weigel RJ
Surgery; 2011 Oct; 150(4):802-9. PubMed ID: 22000194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy for palpable breast cancers.
Fisher CS; Mushawah FA; Cyr AE; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3198-203. PubMed ID: 21861232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Long-term results of phase II ablation after breast lumpectomy added to extend intraoperative margins (ABLATE l) trial.
Klimberg VS; Ochoa D; Henry-Tillman R; Hardee M; Boneti C; Adkins LL; McCarthy M; Tummel E; Lee J; Malak S; Makhoul I; Korourian S
J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Apr; 218(4):741-9. PubMed ID: 24655863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Volume of excision and cosmesis with routine cavity shave margins technique.
Mook J; Klein R; Kobbermann A; Unzeitig A; Euhus D; Peng Y; Sarode V; Moldrem A; Leitch AM; Andrews V; Teotia S; Rao R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):886-91. PubMed ID: 21837529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Intra-operative digital specimen radiology reduces re-operation rates in therapeutic mammaplasty for breast cancer.
Majdak-Paredes EJ; Schaverien MV; Szychta P; Raine C; Dixon JM
Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):556-9. PubMed ID: 26119619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Intraoperative margin evaluation in breast-conservation surgery using margin probe technique].
Melnik I; Lifshitz I; Weinshtein P; Yoffe B
Harefuah; 2014 Jan; 153(1):12-4, 66, 65. PubMed ID: 24605399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A novel ultrasound-guided electrosurgical loop device for intra-operative excision of breast lesions; an improvement in surgical technique.
Fine RE; Schwalke MA; Pellicane JV; Attai DJ
Am J Surg; 2009 Aug; 198(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 19628065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Factors associated with residual breast cancer after re-excision for close or positive margins.
Cellini C; Hollenbeck ST; Christos P; Martins D; Carson J; Kemper S; Lavigne E; Chan E; Simmons R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Oct; 11(10):915-20. PubMed ID: 15383425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Discordance between pathologic and radiologic tumor size on breast MRI may contribute to increased re-excision rates.
Vanderwalde LH; Dang CM; Bresee C; Phillips EH
Am Surg; 2011 Oct; 77(10):1361-3. PubMed ID: 22127089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Reasons for re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: insight from the American Society of Breast Surgeons Mastery(SM) database.
Landercasper J; Whitacre E; Degnim AC; Al-Hamadani M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):3185-91. PubMed ID: 25047472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Margins in breast conserving surgery: The financial cost & potential savings associated with the new margin guidelines.
Singer L; Brown E; Lanni T
Breast; 2016 Aug; 28():1-4. PubMed ID: 27161409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
