84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2804990)
1. Potential and pitfalls of randomized clinical trials in cancer research.
Buyse ME
Cancer Surv; 1989; 8(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 2804990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
Tierney JF; Stewart LA
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the relationship between response to treatment and survival time.
Buyse M; Piedbois P
Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2797-812. PubMed ID: 8981687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in cancer.
Buyse M
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1993 Dec; 20(16):2501-6. PubMed ID: 8279848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery.
Gurusamy KS; Gluud C; Nikolova D; Davidson BR
Br J Surg; 2009 Apr; 96(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 19283747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Problems of randomized controlled study on surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in Japan].
Kodaira S
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1993 Dec; 20(16):2461-6. PubMed ID: 8279842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of bias in methodology for randomized controlled trials published on implant dentistry.
Dumbrigue HB; Al-Bayat MI; Ng CC; Wakefield CW
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 16827739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Palliative chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer].
Jensen TS
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Jan; 164(4):474-6. PubMed ID: 11838416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Significance of carcinoembryonic antigen in the follow up of colorectal cancer].
Sanz Rubiales A; García Alvarez G
Med Clin (Barc); 1998 Feb; 110(7):277-8. PubMed ID: 9562956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evidence-based radiotherapy in the treatment of operable breast cancer: results in the 1990-ies].
Fodor J; Polgár C; Németh G
Orv Hetil; 2000 Jul; 141(28):1551-5. PubMed ID: 10957865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In a randomized controlled trial, missing data led to biased results regarding anxiety.
Ross L; Thomsen BL; Boesen EH; Johansen C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Nov; 57(11):1131-7. PubMed ID: 15567628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Too early to recommend universal screening for colorectal cancer].
Ekelund G; Janzon L
Lakartidningen; 2003 Sep; 100(38):2922-6. PubMed ID: 14558210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer: what can be learned from meta-analysis?].
Buyse M; Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A; Chalmers TC
Bull Cancer; 1989; 76(9):1021-8. PubMed ID: 2695181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Portal vein chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 4000 patients in 10 studies. Liver Infusion Meta-analysis Group.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Apr; 89(7):497-505. PubMed ID: 9086006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring effectiveness. What to expect without a randomized control group.
D'Agostino RB; Kwan H
Med Care; 1995 Apr; 33(4 Suppl):AS95-105. PubMed ID: 7723466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ensuring the comparability of comparison groups: is randomization enough?
Berger VW; Weinstein S
Control Clin Trials; 2004 Oct; 25(5):515-24. PubMed ID: 15465620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
