These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28050215)

  • 1. Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review.
    Crosara PF; Nunes FB; Rodrigues DS; Figueiredo AR; Becker HM; Becker CG; Guimarães RE
    Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jan; 21(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 28050215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of Closed versus Open Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review.
    Gupta R; John J; Ranganathan N; Stepanian R; Gupta M; Hart J; Nossoni F; Shaheen K; Folbe A; Chaiyasate K
    Arch Plast Surg; 2022 Sep; 49(5):569-579. PubMed ID: 36159386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of Closed Versus Open Technique of Rhinoplasty During Primary Repair of Unilateral Cleft Lip: A Systematic Review.
    Jayarajan R; Natarajan A; Nagamuttu R
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Jan; 56(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 29989835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An analysis of 101 primary cosmetic rhinoplasties.
    Bagheri SC; Khan HA; Jahangirnia A; Rad SS; Mortazavi H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):902-9. PubMed ID: 21684661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rhinoplasty approaches: current state of the art.
    Adamson PA; Galli SK
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2005; 7(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 15655172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postoperative Satisfaction in Nasal Bone Fracture Patients Who Had Rhinoplasty.
    Yoon T; Kim Y
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 27(7):1707-1710. PubMed ID: 27748725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differing characteristics in 100 consecutive secondary rhinoplasty patients following closed versus open surgical approaches.
    Constantian MB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 May; 109(6):2097-111. PubMed ID: 11994620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Porous polyethylene implants in revision rhinoplasty: chances and risks.
    Stelter K; Strieth S; Berghaus A
    Rhinology; 2007 Dec; 45(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 18085029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of antibiotics in rhinoplasty and septoplasty: a literature review.
    Georgiou I; Farber N; Mendes D; Winkler E
    Rhinology; 2008 Dec; 46(4):267-70. PubMed ID: 19145993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current clinical practices of the Rhinoplasty Society members.
    Lee M; Unger JG; Gryskiewicz J; Rohrich RJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(5):453-5. PubMed ID: 23511747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence supporting functional rhinoplasty or nasal valve repair: A 25-year systematic review.
    Rhee JS; Arganbright JM; McMullin BT; Hannley M
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jul; 139(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 18585555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional and Aesthetic Factors Associated with Revision of Rhinoplasty.
    Bouaoud J; Loustau M; Belloc JB
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2018 Sep; 6(9):e1884. PubMed ID: 30349780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complications in Rhinoplasty: A Literature Review and Comparison with a Survey of Consent Forms.
    Heilbronn C; Cragun D; Wong BJF
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2020; 22(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 32053419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cosmetic rhinoplasty: revision rates revisited.
    Neaman KC; Boettcher AK; Do VH; Mulder C; Baca M; Renucci JD; VanderWoude DL
    Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Jan; 33(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 23277618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dorsal Preservation: The Push Down Technique Reassessed.
    Saban Y; Daniel RK; Polselli R; Trapasso M; Palhazi P
    Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Feb; 38(2):117-131. PubMed ID: 29319787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Failure and complications of esthetic rhinoplasty. Apropos of 30 reoperations].
    Gilain L; Bossard B; Juvanon JM; Delacour I; Koskas G; Bouaziz A; Peynègre R
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1989; 106(6):310-23. PubMed ID: 2817668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The epidemiology of autologous tissue grafting in primary and revision rhinoplasty.
    Lee LN; Quatela O; Bhattacharyya N
    Laryngoscope; 2019 Jul; 129(7):1549-1553. PubMed ID: 30408189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revision rhinoplasty. Analysis and treatment.
    Kamer FM; McQuown SA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1988 Mar; 114(3):257-66. PubMed ID: 3342118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the effects of open and closed rhinoplasty on the psychosocial stress level and quality of life of rhinoplasty patients.
    Gökçe Kütük S; Arıkan OK
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Aug; 72(8):1347-1354. PubMed ID: 31078414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A complete subperichondrial dissection technique for rhinoplasty with management of the nasal ligaments.
    Cakir B; Oreroğlu AR; Doğan T; Akan M
    Aesthet Surg J; 2012 Jul; 32(5):564-74. PubMed ID: 22745445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.