These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28050509)

  • 1. Correlation of Beta Angle with Antero-Posterior Dysplasia Indicators and FMA: An Institution Based Cephalometric Study.
    Singh G; Verma S; Singh DP; Yadav SK; Yadav AB
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Nov; 10(11):ZC75-ZC78. PubMed ID: 28050509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
    Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photographic Assessment of Cephalometric Measurements in Skeletal Class II Cases: A Comparative Study.
    Mehta P; Sagarkar RM; Mathew S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Jun; 11(6):ZC60-ZC64. PubMed ID: 28764295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictability and Reliability of Different Anterio-Posterior Skeletal Discrepancy Indicators in Different Age Groups - A Cephalometric Study.
    Tiwari R; Shyagali TR; Gupta A; Joshi R; Tiwari A; Sen P
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Sep; 10(9):ZC80-ZC84. PubMed ID: 27790586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Beta and ANB Angles for Evaluation of Sagittal Skeletal Discrepancy: A Cephalometric Study.
    Jajoo A; Agarkar SS; Sharma S; Gadhiya N; Sonawane S; Narkhede S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):739-742. PubMed ID: 29959305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative assessment of sagittal skeletal discrepancy: a cephalometric study.
    Aparna P; Kumar DN; Prasad M; Shamnur N; G AK; K R S; B R GK; Gupta N
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Apr; 9(4):ZC38-41. PubMed ID: 26023641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions after functional treatment with twin block versus myobrace appliances in developing skeletal class II patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Madian AM; Elfouly D
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Dec; 23(1):998. PubMed ID: 38093237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new approach of assessing sagittal dysplasia: the W angle.
    Bhad WA; Nayak S; Doshi UH
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 21303811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the Beta angle.
    Baik CY; Ververidou M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 15224065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between vertical facial morphology and dental arch measurements in class II malocclusion: a retrospective study.
    Ocak I; Karsli N; Altug AT; Aksu M
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16031. PubMed ID: 37692120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cone-beam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in skeletal class Ⅱ female adolescents with different vertical patterns].
    Zhou J; Liu Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):109-119. PubMed ID: 33550344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of Beta angle in assessing true anteroposterior apical base discrepancy in different growth patterns.
    Sundareswaran S; Kumar V
    J Nat Sci Biol Med; 2015; 6(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 25810649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the Stability After Mandibular Setback With Minimal Orthodontics of Class III Patients With Different Facial Types.
    Lee YS; Kim YK; Yun PY; Larson BE; Lee NK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 74(7):1464.e1-1464.e10. PubMed ID: 27060493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors associated with long-term vertical skeletal changes induced by facemask therapy in patients with Class III malocclusion.
    Kwak HJ; Park HJ; Kim YJ; Lee DY
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Mar; 88(2):157-162. PubMed ID: 29131663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions with vertical skeletal pattern.
    Plaza SP; Reimpell A; Silva J; Montoya D
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2019 Sep; 24(4):63-72. PubMed ID: 31508708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(5):75-81. PubMed ID: 30427496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is Counterclockwise Rotation With Double Jaw Orthognathic Surgery Stable in the Long-Term in Hyperdivergent Class III Patients?
    Acar YB; Erdem NF; Acar AH; Erverdi AN; Ugurlu K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 76(9):1983-1990. PubMed ID: 29625030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research on the correlation between the size of condyle and occlusion plane in skeletal Class II malocclusions.
    Hu H; Lin W; Wu J; Xu H
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Dec; 8(6):1547-1554. PubMed ID: 36226743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of anterior and posterior occlusal planes with different Angle and skeletal classes in permanent dentitions : A lateral cephalometric radiograph study.
    Čelar A; Tafaj E; Graf A; Lettner S
    J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Jul; 79(4):267-276. PubMed ID: 29777251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dentoskeletal morphology in adults with Class I, Class II Division 1, or Class II Division 2 malocclusion with increased overbite.
    Uzuner FD; Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):248-256.e2. PubMed ID: 31375235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.