These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28051156)

  • 1. Ingroup/outgroup membership modulates fairness consideration: neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations.
    Wang Y; Zhang Z; Bai L; Lin C; Osinsky R; Hewig J
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():39827. PubMed ID: 28051156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Group Membership Modulates Fairness Consideration Among Deaf College Students-An Event-Related Potential Study.
    Gong Y; Yao L; Chen X; Xia Q; Jiang J; Du X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():794892. PubMed ID: 35211064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Social Comparison Affects Brain Responses to Fairness in Asset Division: An ERP Study with the Ultimatum Game.
    Wu Y; Zhou Y; van Dijk E; Leliveld MC; Zhou X
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2011; 5():131. PubMed ID: 22087088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brain activity in fairness consideration during asset distribution: does the initial ownership play a role?
    Wu Y; Hu J; van Dijk E; Leliveld MC; Zhou X
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e39627. PubMed ID: 22761850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hello handsome! Male's facial attractiveness gives rise to female's fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios-An ERP study.
    Ma Q; Qian D; Hu L; Wang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180459. PubMed ID: 28678888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Moral transgression modulates fairness considerations in the ultimatum game: Evidence from ERP and EEG data.
    Chen T; Tang R; Yang X; Peng M; Cai M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2023 Jun; 188():1-11. PubMed ID: 36889599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Counterfactual comparison modulates fairness consideration in the mini-ultimatum game: an event-related potentials study.
    Liang J; Lin H; Xiang J; Wu H; Li X; Liang H; Zheng X
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Apr; 56(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 25586113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Not on my team: Medial prefrontal cortex responses to ingroup fusion and unfair monetary divisions.
    Apps MAJ; McKay R; Azevedo RT; Whitehouse H; Tsakiris M
    Brain Behav; 2018 Aug; 8(8):e01030. PubMed ID: 29931824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. You are excusable! Neural correlates of economic neediness on empathic concern and fairness perception.
    Wang A; Zhu L; Lyu D; Cai D; Ma Q; Jin J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 22(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 34374029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social distance and anonymity modulate fairness consideration: An ERP study.
    Yu R; Hu P; Zhang P
    Sci Rep; 2015 Aug; 5():13452. PubMed ID: 26293456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game.
    Kaltwasser L; Hildebrandt A; Wilhelm O; Sommer W
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27261490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Infants expect ingroup support to override fairness when resources are limited.
    Bian L; Sloane S; Baillargeon R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(11):2705-2710. PubMed ID: 29483252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The neural correlate of mid-value offers in ultimatum game.
    Zhong X; Wang R; Huang S; Chen J; Chen H; Qu C
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220622. PubMed ID: 31430295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A neural signature of the creation of social evaluation.
    Osinsky R; Mussel P; Ohrlein L; Hewig J
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 9(6):731-6. PubMed ID: 23547246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study.
    Ma Q; Hu Y; Jiang S; Meng L
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():77. PubMed ID: 25805967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ingroup favoritism or the black sheep effect: Perceived intentions modulate subjective responses to aggressive interactions.
    Wang L; Zheng J; Meng L; Lu Q; Ma Q
    Neurosci Res; 2016 Jul; 108():46-54. PubMed ID: 26851770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased Moral Sensitivity for Outgroup Perpetrators Harming Ingroup Members.
    Molenberghs P; Gapp J; Wang B; Louis WR; Decety J
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Jan; 26(1):225-33. PubMed ID: 25183886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hypnotic ingroup-outgroup suggestion influences economic decision-making in an Ultimatum Game.
    Brüne M; Tas C; Wischniewski J; Welpinghus A; Heinisch C; Newen A
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Jun; 21(2):939-46. PubMed ID: 22436887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The time course of neural responses to social versus non-social unfairness in the ultimatum game.
    Chen M; Zhao Z; Lai H
    Soc Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 14(4):409-419. PubMed ID: 29883547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.