144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28052257)
1. A Fully Synthetic Transcriptional Platform for a Multicellular Eukaryote.
Crocker J; Tsai A; Stern DL
Cell Rep; 2017 Jan; 18(1):287-296. PubMed ID: 28052257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A model of spatially restricted transcription in opposing gradients of activators and repressors.
White MA; Parker DS; Barolo S; Cohen BA
Mol Syst Biol; 2012; 8():614. PubMed ID: 23010997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A self-organizing system of repressor gradients establishes segmental complexity in Drosophila.
Clyde DE; Corado MS; Wu X; Paré A; Papatsenko D; Small S
Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6968):849-53. PubMed ID: 14685241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. cis-regulatory logic of short-range transcriptional repression in Drosophila melanogaster.
Kulkarni MM; Arnosti DN
Mol Cell Biol; 2005 May; 25(9):3411-20. PubMed ID: 15831448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evolved Repression Overcomes Enhancer Robustness.
Preger-Ben Noon E; Davis FP; Stern DL
Dev Cell; 2016 Dec; 39(5):572-584. PubMed ID: 27840106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. One thousand and one ways of making functionally similar transcriptional enhancers.
Veitia RA
Bioessays; 2008 Nov; 30(11-12):1052-7. PubMed ID: 18937349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative-enhancer-FACS-seq (QeFS) reveals epistatic interactions among motifs within transcriptional enhancers in developing Drosophila tissue.
Waters CT; Gisselbrecht SS; Sytnikova YA; Cafarelli TM; Hill DE; Bulyk ML
Genome Biol; 2021 Dec; 22(1):348. PubMed ID: 34930411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhancers with cooperative Notch binding sites are more resistant to regulation by the Hairless co-repressor.
Kuang Y; Pyo A; Eafergan N; Cain B; Gutzwiller LM; Axelrod O; Gagliani EK; Weirauch MT; Kopan R; Kovall RA; Sprinzak D; Gebelein B
PLoS Genet; 2021 Sep; 17(9):e1009039. PubMed ID: 34559800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CtBP-independent repression in the Drosophila embryo.
Nibu Y; Senger K; Levine M
Mol Cell Biol; 2003 Jun; 23(11):3990-9. PubMed ID: 12748300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Widespread regulatory specificities between transcriptional co-repressors and enhancers in
Jacobs J; Pagani M; Wenzl C; Stark A
Science; 2023 Jul; 381(6654):198-204. PubMed ID: 37440660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computational identification of developmental enhancers: conservation and function of transcription factor binding-site clusters in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura.
Berman BP; Pfeiffer BD; Laverty TR; Salzberg SL; Rubin GM; Eisen MB; Celniker SE
Genome Biol; 2004; 5(9):R61. PubMed ID: 15345045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitatively predictable control of Drosophila transcriptional enhancers in vivo with engineered transcription factors.
Crocker J; Ilsley GR; Stern DL
Nat Genet; 2016 Mar; 48(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 26854918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-range transcriptional repressors mediate both quenching and direct repression within complex loci in Drosophila.
Gray S; Levine M
Genes Dev; 1996 Mar; 10(6):700-10. PubMed ID: 8598297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative and predictive model of transcriptional control of the Drosophila melanogaster even skipped gene.
Janssens H; Hou S; Jaeger J; Kim AR; Myasnikova E; Sharp D; Reinitz J
Nat Genet; 2006 Oct; 38(10):1159-65. PubMed ID: 16980977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolutionary mirages: selection on binding site composition creates the illusion of conserved grammars in Drosophila enhancers.
Lusk RW; Eisen MB
PLoS Genet; 2010 Jan; 6(1):e1000829. PubMed ID: 20107516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A synthetic biology approach to the development of transcriptional regulatory models and custom enhancer design.
Martinez CA; Barr KA; Kim AR; Reinitz J
Methods; 2013 Jul; 62(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 23732772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolutionary and functional analysis of the tailless enhancer in Musca domestica and Drosophila melanogaster.
Wratten NS; McGregor AP; Shaw PJ; Dover GA
Evol Dev; 2006; 8(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 16409378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural precursor-specific expression of multiple Drosophila genes is driven by dual enhancer modules with overlapping function.
Miller SW; Rebeiz M; Atanasov JE; Posakony JW
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Dec; 111(48):17194-9. PubMed ID: 25404315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative Measurement and Thermodynamic Modeling of Fused Enhancers Support a Two-Tiered Mechanism for Interpreting Regulatory DNA.
Samee MAH; Lydiard-Martin T; Biette KM; Vincent BJ; Bragdon MD; Eckenrode KB; Wunderlich Z; Estrada J; Sinha S; DePace AH
Cell Rep; 2017 Oct; 21(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 28978476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive modeling reveals that higher-order cooperativity drives transcriptional repression in a synthetic developmental enhancer.
Kim YJ; Rhee K; Liu J; Jeammet S; Turner MA; Small SJ; Garcia HG
Elife; 2022 Dec; 11():. PubMed ID: 36503705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
