These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28052566)

  • 1. Comparison of short-term outcomes and three yearsurvival between total minimally invasive McKeown and dual-incision esophagectomy.
    Mu JW; Gao SG; Xue Q; Mao YS; Wang DL; Zhao J; Gao YS; Huang JF; He J
    Thorac Cancer; 2017 Mar; 8(2):80-87. PubMed ID: 28052566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical analysis of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in a single center by a single medical group.
    Zhu ZY; Yong X; Luo RJ; Wang YZ
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2018 Sept.; 19(9):718-725. PubMed ID: 30178638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Mu JW; Gao SG; Xue Q; Mao YS; Wang DL; Zhao J; Gao YS; Huang JF; He J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Dec; 21(45):12873-81. PubMed ID: 26668512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
    Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
    Weksler B; Sullivan JL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Xu Y; Li XK; Cong ZZ; Zhou H; Wu WJ; Qiang Y; Yi J; Shen Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Sep; 34(9):. PubMed ID: 33150401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
    Peng X; Chen Y; Nassor Juma A; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Jiao Y; Zhang W; Zhuang W
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 May; 42(5):546-552. PubMed ID: 28626101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in oncological outcomes: comparison of the conventional and minimally invasive esophagectomy, a single institution experience.
    Khan M; Muzaffar A; Syed AA; Khatak S; Khan AR; Ashraf MI
    Updates Surg; 2016 Dec; 68(4):343-349. PubMed ID: 27629484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standardizing procedures improves and homogenizes short-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Oshikiri T; Nakamura T; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Sumi Y; Fujino Y; Tominaga M; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2018 Mar; 403(2):221-234. PubMed ID: 29572765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
    Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimally invasive McKeown and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal or junctional cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Deng J; Su Q; Ren Z; Wen J; Xue Z; Zhang L; Chu X
    Onco Targets Ther; 2018; 11():6057-6069. PubMed ID: 30275710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for squamous cell esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Hua R; Yang Y; He Y; Ye B; Guo X; Sun Y; Li Z
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Jun; 33(6):. PubMed ID: 31608939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short-term outcomes of robotic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer by a nontransthoracic approach compared with conventional transthoracic surgery.
    Mori K; Yamagata Y; Aikou S; Nishida M; Kiyokawa T; Yagi K; Yamashita H; Nomura S; Seto Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2016 Jul; 29(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 25809390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Xie MR; Liu CQ; Guo MF; Mei XY; Sun XH; Xu MQ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 May; 97(5):1721-7. PubMed ID: 24657031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis of semiprone versus prone position.
    Seesing MFJ; Goense L; Ruurda JP; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van Hillegersberg R
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2758-2765. PubMed ID: 29209832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The sweet approach is still worthwhile in modern esophagectomy.
    Ma J; Zhan C; Wang L; Jiang W; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Wang Q
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 May; 97(5):1728-33. PubMed ID: 24650587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides significant survival advantage compared with open or hybrid esophagectomy for patients with cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.
    Palazzo F; Rosato EL; Chaudhary A; Evans NR; Sendecki JA; Keith S; Chojnacki KA; Yeo CJ; Berger AC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Apr; 220(4):672-9. PubMed ID: 25667145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The implementation of minimally-invasive esophagectomy does not impact short-term outcome in a high-volume center.
    Schwameis K; Ba-Ssalamah A; Wrba F; Birner P; Prager G; Hejna M; Schmid R; Asari R; Zacherl J; Schoppmann SF
    Anticancer Res; 2013 May; 33(5):2085-91. PubMed ID: 23645759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Equivalent Survival to Open Esophagectomy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.
    Mitzman B; Lutfi W; Wang CH; Krantz S; Howington JA; Kim KW
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Summer; 29(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 28823338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.