BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2805349)

  • 1. A retrospective analysis of growth of the constructed condyle-ramus in children with hemifacial microsomia.
    Mulliken JB; Ferraro NF; Vento AR
    Cleft Palate J; 1989 Oct; 26(4):312-7. PubMed ID: 2805349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Growth after construction of the temporomandibular joint in children with hemifacial microsomia.
    Munro IR; Phillips JH; Griffin G
    Cleft Palate J; 1989 Oct; 26(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 2805348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Midfacial growth after costochondral graft construction of the mandibular ramus in hemifacial microsomia.
    Padwa BL; Mulliken JB; Maghen A; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Feb; 56(2):122-7; discussion 127-8. PubMed ID: 9461132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The costochondral graft: a solution or a source of facial asymmetry in growing children. A case report.
    Peltomäki T; Isotupa K
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1991; 87(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 2057484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting long-term results in hemifacial microsomia.
    Vargervik K; Ousterhout DK; Farias M
    Cleft Palate J; 1986 Dec; 23 Suppl 1():53-68. PubMed ID: 3545547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraoral distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in hemifacial microsomia.
    Rachmiel A; Manor R; Peled M; Laufer D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jul; 59(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 11429728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The importance of a differential diagnosis between true hemifacial microsomia and pseudo-hemifacial microsomia in the post-surgical long-term prognosis.
    Meazzini MC; Brusati R; Diner P; Giannì E; Lalatta F; Magri AS; Picard A; Sesenna E
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 39(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 20456963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Morphometry of the mandible in prepubertal craniofacial microsomia patients following an inverted L osteotomy.
    Singh GD; Hay AD
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 10686847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mandibular asymmetry and the fourth dimension.
    Kaban LB
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20 Suppl 1():622-31. PubMed ID: 19182686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Costochondral graft construction/reconstruction of the ramus/condyle unit: long-term follow-up.
    Perrott DH; Umeda H; Kaban LB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1994 Dec; 23(6 Pt 1):321-8. PubMed ID: 7699266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: long-term follow-up.
    Meazzini MC; Mazzoleni F; Gabriele C; Bozzetti A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 33(6):370-6. PubMed ID: 16256360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical correction of hemifacial microsomia in the growing child.
    Kaban LB; Moses MH; Mulliken JB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1988 Jul; 82(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 3289066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simultaneous costochondral ramus-condyle reconstruction and mandibular distraction for hemifacial microsomia.
    Morris R; Beckett J; Steinbacher DM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 70(10):e541-6. PubMed ID: 22868035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accelerated development of the first and second mandibular molars after distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in patients with hemifacial microsomia.
    Kim S; Park JL; Baek SH; Chung JH; Kim JC; Park CG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 May; 20(3):797-800. PubMed ID: 19390458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does functional appliance treatment truly improve stability of mandibular vertical distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia?
    Meazzini MC; Mazzoleni F; Bozzetti A; Brusati R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 36(7):384-9. PubMed ID: 18442918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. True hemifacial microsomia and hemimandibular hypoplasia with condylar-coronoid collapse: diagnostic and prognostic differences.
    Meazzini MC; Brusati R; Caprioglio A; Diner P; Garattini G; Giannì E; Lalatta F; Poggio C; Sesenna E; Silvestri A; Tomat C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):e435-47. PubMed ID: 21536185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unpredictable growth pattern of costochondral graft.
    Guyuron B; Lasa CI
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1992 Nov; 90(5):880-6; discussion 887-9. PubMed ID: 1410040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional longitudinal changes in craniofacial growth in untreated hemifacial microsomia patients with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Shibazaki-Yorozuya R; Yamada A; Nagata S; Ueda K; Miller AJ; Maki K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):579-94. PubMed ID: 24785922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic approach to the ramus/condyle unit: Clinical applications.
    Troulis MJ; Kaban LB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 May; 59(5):503-9. PubMed ID: 11326371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A longitudinal three-dimensional evaluation of the growth pattern in hemifacial microsomia treated by mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a preliminary report.
    Kusnoto B; Figueroa AA; Polley JW
    J Craniofac Surg; 1999 Nov; 10(6):480-6. PubMed ID: 10726500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.