These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28054098)

  • 21. How much does language proficiency by non-native listeners influence speech audiometric tests in noise?
    Warzybok A; Brand T; Wagener KC; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():88-99. PubMed ID: 26344170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Temporally pre-presented lipreading cues release speech from informational masking.
    Wu C; Cao S; Wu X; Li L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):EL281-5. PubMed ID: 23556692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech.
    Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Nov; 112(5 Pt 1):2086-98. PubMed ID: 12430820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Switching Streams Across Ears to Evaluate Informational Masking of Speech-on-Speech.
    Calcus A; Schoof T; Rosen S; Shinn-Cunningham B; Souza P
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 31107365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modulation masking release using the Brazilian-Portuguese HINT: psychometric functions and the effect of speech time compression.
    Grose JH; Griz S; Pacífico FA; Advíncula KP; Menezes DC
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Apr; 54(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 25630394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ageing without hearing loss or cognitive impairment causes a decrease in speech intelligibility only in informational maskers.
    Rajan R; Cainer KE
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(2):784-95. PubMed ID: 18485606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults.
    Huang Y; Huang Q; Chen X; Qu T; Wu X; Li L
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):51-65. PubMed ID: 18694813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.
    Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2246-56. PubMed ID: 15139635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Two-tone auditory suppression in younger and older normal-hearing adults and its relationship to speech perception in noise.
    Sommers MS; Gehr SE
    Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 264(1-2):56-62. PubMed ID: 20006694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Speech audiometry, speech perception and cognitive functions. German version].
    Meister H
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):189-194. PubMed ID: 27680543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Binaural masking release in children with Down syndrome.
    Porter HL; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Tharpe AM
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):e134-42. PubMed ID: 24535557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Word recognition in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores and increases in masking.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):914-22. PubMed ID: 16158647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Hearing tests in practice : Audiometric masking in pure-tone and speech audiometry].
    Rader T; Canis M
    HNO; 2022 Oct; 70(10):783-789. PubMed ID: 36083470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effects of reverberation on a listener's ability to recognize target sentences in the presence of up to three synchronized masking sentences.
    Abouchacra KS; Besing J; Koehnke J; Letowski T
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):468-76. PubMed ID: 21668326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.