These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28054796)

  • 61. Cattle discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by using only head visual cues.
    Coulon M; Baudoin C; Heyman Y; Deputte BL
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Mar; 14(2):279-90. PubMed ID: 21132446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Second-order relational face processing is applied to faces of different race and photographic contrast.
    Matheson HE; Bilsbury TG; McMullen PA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 22148904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Who are you looking at? The influence of face gender on visual attention and memory for own- and other-race faces.
    Lovén J; Rehnman J; Wiens S; Lindholm T; Peira N; Herlitz A
    Memory; 2012; 20(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 22364145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Diagnostic feature training improves face matching accuracy.
    Towler A; Keshwa M; Ton B; Kemp RI; White D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1288-1298. PubMed ID: 33914576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Expertise with unfamiliar objects is flexible to changes in task but not changes in class.
    Searston RA; Tangen JM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178403. PubMed ID: 28574998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Learning faces from variability.
    Ritchie KL; Burton AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):897-905. PubMed ID: 26831280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. How does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces?: a PET study of face categorical perception.
    Rossion B; Schiltz C; Robaye L; Pirenne D; Crommelinck M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):1019-34. PubMed ID: 11595103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Judging Normality and Attractiveness in Faces: Direct Evidence of a More Refined Representation for Own-Race, Young Adult Faces.
    Zhou X; Short LA; Chan HS; Mondloch CJ
    Perception; 2016 Sep; 45(9):973-90. PubMed ID: 27335127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Robust effects of affective person learning on evaluation of faces.
    Verosky SC; Porter J; Martinez JE; Todorov A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Apr; 114(4):516-528. PubMed ID: 29620399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. How does a newly encountered face become familiar? The effect of within-person variability on adults' and children's perception of identity.
    Baker KA; Laurence S; Mondloch CJ
    Cognition; 2017 Apr; 161():19-30. PubMed ID: 28092773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Deliberate disguise in face identification.
    Noyes E; Jenkins R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Jun; 25(2):280-290. PubMed ID: 30730157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Neural correlates of facilitations in face learning by selective caricaturing of facial shape or reflectance.
    Itz ML; Schweinberger SR; Schulz C; Kaufmann JM
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 102 Pt 2():736-47. PubMed ID: 25173417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Impaired grouping of ambient facial images in autism.
    Gehdu BK; Gray KLH; Cook R
    Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6665. PubMed ID: 35461345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Early electrophysiological correlates of adaptation to personally familiar and unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes.
    Caharel S; Jacques C; d'Arripe O; Ramon M; Rossion B
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():85-98. PubMed ID: 21362409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Sheep recognize familiar and unfamiliar human faces from two-dimensional images.
    Knolle F; Goncalves RP; Morton AJ
    R Soc Open Sci; 2017 Nov; 4(11):171228. PubMed ID: 29291109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. How macaques view familiarity and gaze in conspecific faces.
    Leonard TK; Blumenthal G; Gothard KM; Hoffman KL
    Behav Neurosci; 2012 Dec; 126(6):781-91. PubMed ID: 23067381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition.
    Ellis HD; Shepherd JW; Davies GM
    Perception; 1979; 8(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 503774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. From face processing to face recognition: Comparing three different processing levels.
    Besson G; Barragan-Jason G; Thorpe SJ; Fabre-Thorpe M; Puma S; Ceccaldi M; Barbeau EJ
    Cognition; 2017 Jan; 158():33-43. PubMed ID: 27776224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.