These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28056637)

  • 1. Triple play: Additive contributions of enhanced expectancies, autonomy support, and external attentional focus to motor learning.
    Wulf G; Lewthwaite R; Cardozo P; Chiviacowsky S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Apr; 71(4):824-831. PubMed ID: 28056637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Onward and upward: Optimizing motor performance.
    Chua LK; Wulf G; Lewthwaite R
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Aug; 60():107-114. PubMed ID: 29859387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A test of optimal theory on young adolescents' standing long jump performance and motivation.
    Simpson T; Cronin L; Ellison P; Carnegie E; Marchant D
    Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Aug; 72():102651. PubMed ID: 32721370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. OPTIMAL practice conditions enhance the benefits of gradually increasing error opportunities on retention of a stepping sequence task.
    Levac D; Driscoll K; Galvez J; Mercado K; O'Neil L
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Dec; 56(Pt B):129-138. PubMed ID: 29128736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External focus and autonomy support: two important factors in motor learning have additive benefits.
    Wulf G; Chiviacowsky S; Drews R
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Apr; 40():176-84. PubMed ID: 25589021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motivational effects of enhancing expectancies and autonomy for motor learning: An examination of the OPTIMAL theory.
    Ghorbani S
    J Gen Psychol; 2019; 146(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 30654726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning.
    Wulf G; Chiviacowsky S; Cardozo PL
    Hum Mov Sci; 2014 Oct; 37():12-20. PubMed ID: 25046402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maximal force production requires OPTIMAL conditions.
    Singh H; Hockwald A; Drake N; Avedesian J; Lee SP; Wulf G
    Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Oct; 73():102661. PubMed ID: 32741751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimizing Motor Learning in Older Adults.
    Khalaji Z; Nezakat Alhosseini M; Safavi Hamami S; Iwatsuki T; Wulf G
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2024 Jan; 79(1):. PubMed ID: 37591686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Additive benefits of external focus and enhanced performance expectancy for motor learning.
    Pascua LA; Wulf G; Lewthwaite R
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 24875153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning.
    Wulf G; Lewthwaite R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1382-1414. PubMed ID: 26833314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Choose your words wisely: Optimizing impacts on standardized performance testing.
    Chua LK; Wulf G; Lewthwaite R
    Gait Posture; 2020 Jun; 79():210-216. PubMed ID: 32442896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skilled Throwing Performance: A Test of the OPTIMAL Theory.
    Sertic JVL; Avedesian JM; Navalta JW
    Int J Exerc Sci; 2021; 14(5):358-368. PubMed ID: 34055170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing motivation and attention for motor performance and learning.
    Lewthwaite R; Wulf G
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2017 Aug; 16():38-42. PubMed ID: 28813352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of self-controlled practice and focus of attention on free throw accuracy: Exploring optimal theory among skilled basketball players.
    Shooli M; Saemi E; Boushehri NS; Seifourian M; Simpson T
    Hum Mov Sci; 2024 Apr; 94():103187. PubMed ID: 38330629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The self: Your own worst enemy? A test of the self-invoking trigger hypothesis.
    McKay B; Wulf G; Lewthwaite R; Nordin A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1910-9. PubMed ID: 25565349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the continuing problem of inappropriate learning measures: Comment on Wulf et al. (2014) and Wulf et al. (2015).
    Fischman MG
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Aug; 42():225-31. PubMed ID: 26072360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why self-controlled feedback enhances motor learning: Answers from electroencephalography and indices of motivation.
    Grand KF; Bruzi AT; Dyke FB; Godwin MM; Leiker AM; Thompson AG; Buchanan TL; Miller MW
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Oct; 43():23-32. PubMed ID: 26163375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choose to move: The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning.
    Lewthwaite R; Chiviacowsky S; Drews R; Wulf G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1383-8. PubMed ID: 25732095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immersive Real-Time Biofeedback Optimized With Enhanced Expectancies Improves Motor Learning: A Feasibility Study.
    Williams AM; Hogg JA; Diekfuss JA; Kendall SB; Jenkins CT; Acocello SN; Liang Y; Wu D; Myer GD; Wilkerson GB
    J Sport Rehabil; 2022 Nov; 31(8):1023-1030. PubMed ID: 35728805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.