273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28058482)
1. Comparison of the effects of model-based iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection algorithms on software measurements in pulmonary subsolid nodules.
Cohen JG; Kim H; Park SB; van Ginneken B; Ferretti GR; Lee CH; Goo JM; Park CM
Eur Radiol; 2017 Aug; 27(8):3266-3274. PubMed ID: 28058482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules: model-based iterative reconstruction for nodule classification and measurement variability on low-dose CT.
Kim H; Park CM; Kim SH; Lee SM; Park SJ; Lee KH; Goo JM
Eur Radiol; 2014 Nov; 24(11):2700-8. PubMed ID: 25038857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective intra-individual comparison of standard dose versus reduced-dose thoracic CT using hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction in a follow-up cohort of pulmonary nodules-Effect of detectability of pulmonary nodules with lowering dose based on nodule size, type and body mass index.
Vardhanabhuti V; Pang CL; Tenant S; Taylor J; Hyde C; Roobottom C
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jun; 91():130-141. PubMed ID: 28629559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Volumetric quantification of lung nodules in CT with iterative reconstruction (ASiR and MBIR).
Chen B; Barnhart H; Richard S; Robins M; Colsher J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111902. PubMed ID: 24320435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of CT Reconstruction Algorithm on the Diagnostic Performance of Radiomics Models: A Task-Based Approach for Pulmonary Subsolid Nodules.
Kim H; Park CM; Gwak J; Hwang EJ; Lee SY; Jung J; Hong H; Goo JM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Mar; 212(3):505-512. PubMed ID: 30476456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms on Computer-assisted Detection (CAD) Software for Lung Nodules in Ultra-low-dose CT for Lung Cancer Screening.
Nomura Y; Higaki T; Fujita M; Miki S; Awaya Y; Nakanishi T; Yoshikawa T; Hayashi N; Awai K
Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):124-130. PubMed ID: 27986507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Volumetric measurement of artificial pure ground-glass nodules at low-dose CT: Comparisons between hybrid iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection.
Sakai N; Yabuuchi H; Kondo M; Kojima T; Nagatomo K; Kawanami S; Kamitani T; Yonezawa M; Nagao M; Honda H
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2654-62. PubMed ID: 26362824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT Dose Reduction for Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurement: Effects of Model-Based and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructions and Filtered Back Projection.
Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Niijima Y; Hashimoto M; Yamada M; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):W677-83. PubMed ID: 26001256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection and size measurements of pulmonary nodules in ultra-low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction compared to low dose CT.
Sui X; Meinel FG; Song W; Xu X; Wang Z; Wang Y; Jin Z; Chen J; Vliegenthart R; Schoepf UJ
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Mar; 85(3):564-70. PubMed ID: 26860668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vascular diameter measurement in CT angiography: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction and standard filtered back projection algorithms in vitro.
Suzuki S; Machida H; Tanaka I; Ueno E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):652-7. PubMed ID: 23436858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic error in lung nodule volumetry: effect of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection at different CT parameters.
Willemink MJ; Leiner T; Budde RP; de Kort FP; Vliegenthart R; van Ooijen PM; Oudkerk M; de Jong PA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 23169714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: image quality assessment in the cervicothoracic region.
Katsura M; Sato J; Akahane M; Matsuda I; Ishida M; Yasaka K; Kunimatsu A; Ohtomo K
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 23199752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the image qualities of filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction for CT venography at 80 kVp.
Kim JH; Choo KS; Moon TY; Lee JW; Jeon UB; Kim TU; Hwang JY; Yun MJ; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2055-63. PubMed ID: 26486938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultralow-dose CT with tin filtration for detection of solid and sub solid pulmonary nodules: a phantom study.
Martini K; Higashigaito K; Barth BK; Baumueller S; Alkadhi H; Frauenfelder T
Br J Radiol; 2015; 88(1056):20150389. PubMed ID: 26492317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Submillisievert chest CT with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction techniques.
Padole A; Singh S; Ackman JB; Wu C; Do S; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Otrakji A; Digumarthy S; Shepard JA; Kalra M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):772-81. PubMed ID: 25247943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultra-low-dose CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): detection of ground-glass nodules in an anthropomorphic phantom study.
Rampinelli C; Origgi D; Vecchi V; Funicelli L; Raimondi S; Deak P; Bellomi M
Radiol Med; 2015 Jul; 120(7):611-7. PubMed ID: 25656039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving the prediction of lung adenocarcinoma invasive component on CT: Value of a vessel removal algorithm during software segmentation of subsolid nodules.
Garzelli L; Goo JM; Ahn SY; Chae KJ; Park CM; Jung J; Hong H
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Mar; 100():58-65. PubMed ID: 29496080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of subsolid nodules: Evaluation of a commercial CAD system.
Benzakoun J; Bommart S; Coste J; Chassagnon G; Lederlin M; Boussouar S; Revel MP
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1728-1734. PubMed ID: 27666609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
