These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28059634)

  • 1. Judgments of moral responsibility and wrongness for intentional and accidental harm and purity violations.
    Parkinson M; Byrne RMJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):779-789. PubMed ID: 28059634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Asking 'why?' enhances theory of mind when evaluating harm but not purity violations.
    Dungan JA; Young L
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 14(7):699-708. PubMed ID: 31269193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains.
    Young L; Saxe R
    Cognition; 2011 Aug; 120(2):202-14. PubMed ID: 21601839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When minds matter for moral judgment: intent information is neurally encoded for harmful but not impure acts.
    Chakroff A; Dungan J; Koster-Hale J; Brown A; Saxe R; Young L
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Mar; 11(3):476-84. PubMed ID: 26628642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physical Attractiveness Biases Judgments Pertaining to the Moral Domain of Purity.
    Klebl C; Rhee JJ; Greenaway KH; Luo Y; Bastian B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Feb; 49(2):282-295. PubMed ID: 34964373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tainting the soul: purity concerns predict moral judgments of suicide.
    Rottman J; Kelemen D; Young L
    Cognition; 2014 Feb; 130(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 24333538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Innocent intentions: a correlation between forgiveness for accidental harm and neural activity.
    Young L; Saxe R
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2065-72. PubMed ID: 19467357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Illuminating the conceptual structure of the space of moral violations with searchlight representational similarity analysis.
    Wasserman EA; Chakroff A; Saxe R; Young L
    Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():371-387. PubMed ID: 28743459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relevance of moral norms in distinct relational contexts: Purity versus harm norms regulate self-directed actions.
    Dungan JA; Chakroff A; Young L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173405. PubMed ID: 28278214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Many moral buttons or just one? Evidence from emotional facial expressions.
    Franchin L; Geipel J; Hadjichristidis C; Surian L
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Aug; 33(5):943-958. PubMed ID: 30200861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Specks of Dirt and Tons of Pain: Dosage Distinguishes Impurity From Harm.
    Rottman J; Young L
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1151-1160. PubMed ID: 31242081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Harming ourselves and defiling others: what determines a moral domain?
    Chakroff A; Dungan J; Young L
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74434. PubMed ID: 24040245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Easy on the mind, easy on the wrongdoer: discrepantly fluent violations are deemed less morally wrong.
    Laham SM; Alter AL; Goodwin GP
    Cognition; 2009 Sep; 112(3):462-6. PubMed ID: 19573863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm.
    Cushman F; Young L; Hauser M
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1082-9. PubMed ID: 17201791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imagining wrong: Fictitious contexts mitigate condemnation of harm more than impurity.
    Sabo JS; Giner-Sorolla R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Jan; 146(1):134-153. PubMed ID: 28054817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of causal and intentional judgments in moral reasoning in individuals with high functioning autism.
    Buon M; Dupoux E; Jacob P; Chaste P; Leboyer M; Zalla T
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2013 Feb; 43(2):458-70. PubMed ID: 22760338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An event-related potential study of adolescents' and young adults' judgments of moral and social conventional violations.
    Lahat A; Helwig CC; Zelazo PD
    Child Dev; 2013; 84(3):955-69. PubMed ID: 23106222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Moral Judgments of COVID-19 Social Distancing Violations: The Roles of Perceived Harm and Impurity.
    Rosenfeld DL; Tomiyama AJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 May; 48(5):766-781. PubMed ID: 34247528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implicit moral evaluations: A multinomial modeling approach.
    Cameron CD; Payne BK; Sinnott-Armstrong W; Scheffer JA; Inzlicht M
    Cognition; 2017 Jan; 158():224-241. PubMed ID: 27865113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Experienced Disgust on Morally-Relevant Judgments.
    Olatunji BO; David Puncochar B; Cox R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160357. PubMed ID: 27482909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.