These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28059820)

  • 21. The experience of return to work in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI): A qualitative study.
    Libeson L; Downing M; Ross P; Ponsford J
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2020 Apr; 30(3):412-429. PubMed ID: 29745289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors of importance for return to work, experienced by patients with chronic pain that have completed a multimodal rehabilitation program - a focus group study.
    Svanholm F; Liedberg GM; Löfgren M; Björk M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Mar; 44(5):736-744. PubMed ID: 32580604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reintegrating Employees Undergoing Cancer Treatment into the Workplace: A Qualitative Study of Employer and Co-worker Perspectives.
    Petersen KS; Momsen AH; Stapelfeldt CM; Nielsen CV
    J Occup Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 29(4):764-772. PubMed ID: 31056724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Patients' experience of return to work rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: a phenomenological study.
    Hooson JM; Coetzer R; Stew G; Moore A
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2013; 23(1):19-44. PubMed ID: 22905786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Organisational prerequisites for coordinating the return-to-work process for people with multimorbidity and psychosocial difficulties.
    Svärd V; Jannas S
    Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Sep; 45(18):2915-2924. PubMed ID: 36006799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exploring Employer Perspectives on Their Supportive Role in Accommodating Workers with Disabilities to Promote Sustainable RTW: A Qualitative Study.
    Jansen J; Boot CRL; Alma MA; Brouwer S
    J Occup Rehabil; 2022 Mar; 32(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 35166974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Survey of survivors' perspective on return to work after stroke.
    Hartke RJ; Trierweiler R
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2015 Oct; 22(5):326-34. PubMed ID: 25920538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Barriers and facilitators of return to work for individuals with strokes: perspectives of the stroke survivor, vocational specialist, and employer.
    Culler KH; Wang YC; Byers K; Trierweiler R
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2011; 18(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 21914597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Return to work for severely injured survivors of the Christchurch earthquake: influences in the first 2 years.
    Nunnerley J; Dunn J; McPherson K; Hooper G; Woodfield T
    Disabil Rehabil; 2016; 38(10):987-93. PubMed ID: 26213243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of the Australian workplace return to work coordinator: essential qualities and attributes.
    Bohatko-Naismith J; James C; Guest M; Rivett DA
    J Occup Rehabil; 2015 Mar; 25(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 24908105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Work-related predictors for return to work after stroke.
    Palstam A; Westerlind E; Persson HC; Sunnerhagen KS
    Acta Neurol Scand; 2019 Apr; 139(4):382-388. PubMed ID: 30657175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Being a co-worker or a manager of a colleague returning to work after stroke: A challenge facilitated by cooperation and flexibility.
    Öst Nilsson A; Eriksson G; Asaba E; Johansson U; Hellman T
    Scand J Occup Ther; 2020 Apr; 27(3):213-222. PubMed ID: 30696320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Towards a new definition of return-to-work outcomes in common mental disorders from a multi-stakeholder perspective.
    Hees HL; Nieuwenhuijsen K; Koeter MW; Bültmann U; Schene AH
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e39947. PubMed ID: 22768180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Insights into workplace Return to Work Coordinator training: An Australian perspective.
    Bohatko-Naismith J; Guest M; Rivett DA; James C
    Work; 2016 Sep; 55(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 27286068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Environmental and personal factors that support early return-to-work: a qualitative study using the ICF as a framework.
    Hoefsmit N; Houkes I; Nijhuis F
    Work; 2014; 48(2):203-15. PubMed ID: 23803441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acceptability of a digital return-to-work intervention for common mental disorders: a qualitative study on service user perspectives.
    Engdahl P; Svedberg P; Bejerholm U
    BMC Psychiatry; 2021 Aug; 21(1):384. PubMed ID: 34344327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Return-to-work activities in a Chinese cultural context.
    Cheng AS; Loisel P; Feuerstein M
    J Occup Rehabil; 2011 Mar; 21 Suppl 1():S44-54. PubMed ID: 21080213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research.
    Franche RL; Baril R; Shaw W; Nicholas M; Loisel P
    J Occup Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 15(4):525-42. PubMed ID: 16254753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using multiple stakeholders to define a successful return to work: a concept mapping approach.
    Leyshon R; Shaw L
    Work; 2012; 41(4):397-408. PubMed ID: 22495410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Exploring the experiences of rehabilitated stroke survivors and stakeholders with regard to returning to work in South- West Nigeria.
    Soeker MS; Olaoye OA
    Work; 2017; 57(4):595-609. PubMed ID: 28826202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.