These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28061943)

  • 1. The effects of awareness and secondary task demands on Stroop performance in the pre-cued lists paradigm.
    Bugg JM; Diede NT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():26-35. PubMed ID: 28061943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When global and local information about attentional demands collide: evidence for global dominance.
    Suh J; Ileri-Tayar M; Bugg JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):1858-1873. PubMed ID: 35701660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expectations and experience: Dissociable bases for cognitive control?
    Bugg JM; Diede NT; Cohen-Shikora ER; Selmeczy D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1349-73. PubMed ID: 25689002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. List-wide control is not entirely elusive: evidence from picture-word Stroop.
    Bugg JM; Chanani S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Oct; 18(5):930-6. PubMed ID: 21638107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revealing list-level control in the Stroop task by uncovering its benefits and a cost.
    Bugg JM; McDaniel MA; Scullin MK; Braver TS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1595-606. PubMed ID: 21767049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The next trial will be conflicting! Effects of explicit congruency pre-cues on cognitive control.
    Bugg JM; Smallwood A
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jan; 80(1):16-33. PubMed ID: 25522873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When stimulus-driven control settings compete: On the dominance of categories as cues for control.
    Bugg JM; Dey A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1905-1932. PubMed ID: 30211592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. It is harder than you think: On the boundary conditions of exploiting congruency cues.
    Jiménez L; Méndez C; Abrahamse E; Braem S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1686-1704. PubMed ID: 32297789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. State-dependent effects of alcohol on recollective experience, familiarity and awareness of memories.
    Duka T; Weissenborn R; Dienes Z
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2001 Jan; 153(3):295-306. PubMed ID: 11271401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The benefit of expecting no conflict--Stronger influence of self-generated than cue-induced conflict expectations on Stroop performance.
    Kemper M; Gaschler R; Schwager S; Schubert T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():135-41. PubMed ID: 26649453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence for interaction between the stop signal and the Stroop task conflict.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):579-92. PubMed ID: 22390293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Congruency precues moderate item-specific proportion congruency effects.
    Hutchison KA; Bugg JM; Lim YB; Olsen MR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1087-103. PubMed ID: 26860710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distinct neural correlates for resolving stroop conflict at inhibited and noninhibited locations in inhibition of return.
    Chen Q; Wei P; Zhou X
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1937-46. PubMed ID: 17069483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pupillary correlates of preparatory control in the Stroop task.
    Unsworth N; Miller AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Oct; 85(7):2277-2295. PubMed ID: 37407798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Post-error slowing is influenced by cognitive control demand.
    Regev S; Meiran N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Oct; 152():10-8. PubMed ID: 25089881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect.
    Goldfarb L; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1170-6. PubMed ID: 17924815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modulation of conflicts in the Stroop effect.
    Shichel I; Tzelgov J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():93-102. PubMed ID: 29078981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What is cued by faces in the face-based context-specific proportion congruent manipulation?
    Hutcheon T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1248-1263. PubMed ID: 35174463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive information speeds up visual awareness in an individuation task by modulating threshold setting, not processing efficiency.
    De Loof E; Van Opstal F; Verguts T
    Vision Res; 2016 Apr; 121():104-112. PubMed ID: 26975499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.