These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28062152)

  • 41. Application and validation of Diagnose Sexuelle Probabiliste V2 tool in a miscegenated population.
    Machado MPS; Costa ST; Freire AR; Navega D; Cunha E; Daruge Júnior E; Prado FB; Rossi AC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Sep; 290():351.e1-351.e5. PubMed ID: 30077496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Acetabular osteometric standards for sex estimation in contemporary Croatian population.
    Bubalo P; Baković M; Tkalčić M; Petrovečki V; Mayer D
    Croat Med J; 2019 Jun; 60(3):221-226. PubMed ID: 31187949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Sexual dimorphism in ulna: an osteometric study from India.
    Srivastava R; Saini V; Rai RK; Pandey S; Singh TB; Tripathi SK; Pandey AK
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Sep; 58(5):1251-1256. PubMed ID: 23718819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. DSP2 for sex determination of miscegenated contemporary hip bones.
    Lopes ARO; Silva EML; Nascimento MMDS; Silva MC; Magalhães CP; Cerqueira GS
    Anat Histol Embryol; 2024 Jan; 53(1):e12979. PubMed ID: 37792903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A new computer-tomography-based method of sex estimation: Development of Turkish population-specific standards.
    Gulhan O; Harrison K; Kiris A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Oct; 255():2-8. PubMed ID: 26250530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sex prediction from the femur and hip bone using a sample of CT images from a Spanish population.
    Clavero A; Salicrú M; Turbón D
    Int J Legal Med; 2015 Mar; 129(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 25270588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Morphometric analysis of pelvic sexual dimorphism in a contemporary Western Australian population.
    Franklin D; Cardini A; Flavel A; Marks MK
    Int J Legal Med; 2014 Sep; 128(5):861-72. PubMed ID: 24789357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sexing the bony labyrinth: A morphometric investigation in a subadult and adult Belgian identified sample.
    Boucherie A; Polet C; Lefèvre P; Vercauteren M
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):808-820. PubMed ID: 33604887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sexual dimorphism in the tarsal bones: implications for sex determination.
    Harris SM; Case DT
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):295-305. PubMed ID: 22211822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The efficacy of sternal measurements for sex estimation in South African blacks.
    Macaluso PJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Oct; 202(1-3):111.e1-7. PubMed ID: 20696541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of lumbar vertebrae.
    Ostrofsky KR; Churchill SE
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 25382679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Sacral morphometrics for sex estimation of dead cases in Central Thailand.
    Naksuwan N; Parasompong N; Praihirunkit P; Aobaom S; Khamphikham P
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2021 Feb; 48():101824. PubMed ID: 33310090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Adult sex estimation from the minimum supero-inferior femoral neck diameter in a contemporary osteological sample from Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    Luna LH; Bosio L; García Guraieb S; Aranda C
    Sci Justice; 2021 Sep; 61(5):528-534. PubMed ID: 34482932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Population-specificity of sexual dimorphism in cranial and pelvic traits: evaluation of existing and proposal of new functions for sex assessment in a Greek assemblage.
    Oikonomopoulou EK; Valakos E; Nikita E
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Nov; 131(6):1731-1738. PubMed ID: 28770382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sex estimation by femur in modern Thai population.
    Monum T; Prasitwattanseree S; Das S; Siriphimolwat P; Mahakkanukrauh P
    Clin Ter; 2017; 168(3):e203-e207. PubMed ID: 28612898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Morphometric sex estimation from 3D computed tomography os coxae model and its validation in skeletal remains.
    Djorojevic M; Roldán C; García-Parra P; Alemán I; Botella M
    Int J Legal Med; 2014 Sep; 128(5):879-88. PubMed ID: 24928326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Accuracies of discriminant function equations for sex estimation using long bones of upper extremities.
    Bidmos MA; Mazengenya P
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 May; 135(3):1095-1102. PubMed ID: 33179172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sex assessment using the radius bone in a French sample when applying various statistical models.
    Nogueira L; Santos F; Castier F; Knecht S; Bernardi C; Alunni V
    Int J Legal Med; 2023 May; 137(3):925-934. PubMed ID: 36826526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Estimation of sex using dimensions around the metatarsal diaphyseal nutrient foramen: Application of discriminant function analysis and logistic regression models.
    Manjatika AT; Davimes JG; Mazengenya P
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2024 May; 68():102417. PubMed ID: 38295532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Sex estimation of os coxae using DSP2 software: A validation study of a Greek sample.
    Kranioti EF; Šťovíčková L; Karell MA; Brůžek J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():371.e1-371.e6. PubMed ID: 30851999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.