209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28062659)
1. Bone marrow biopsies performed by both the powered OnControl drill device and the Jamshidi needle produce adequate specimens.
Jain S; Enzerra M; Mehta RS; Smith R; Djokic M
J Clin Pathol; 2017 Jun; 70(6):541-543. PubMed ID: 28062659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the bone marrow trephine sample quality between OnControl drill system and the Jamshidi needle.
Forwood KM; Lee E; Crispin PJ
Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Jun; 41(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 30779423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adequacy of powered vs manual bone marrow biopsy specimens: a retrospective review of sequential marrow aspirates and biopsies in 68 patients.
Lynch DW; Stauffer SL; Rosenthal NS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Apr; 143(4):535-9. PubMed ID: 25780005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective randomised study of a rotary powered device (OnControl) for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy.
Swords RT; Anguita J; Higgins RA; Yunes AC; Naski M; Padmanabhan S; Kelly KR; Mahalingam D; Philbeck T; Miller L; Puga TA; Giles FJ; Kinney MC; Brenner AJ
J Clin Pathol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):809-13. PubMed ID: 21606230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rotary powered device for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy yields excellent specimens quickly and efficiently.
Swords RT; Kelly KR; Cohen SC; Miller LJ; Philbeck TE; Hacker SO; Spadaccini CJ; Giles FJ; Brenner AJ
J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 63(6):562-5. PubMed ID: 20404008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone Marrow Biopsy Needle Type Affects Core Biopsy Specimen Length and Quality and Aspirate Hemodilution.
Brestoff JR; Toland A; Afaneh K; Qavi AJ; Press B; Westervelt P; Kreisel F; Hassan A
Am J Clin Pathol; 2019 Jan; 151(2):185-193. PubMed ID: 30307478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using a powered bone marrow biopsy system results in shorter procedures, causes less residual pain to adult patients, and yields larger specimens.
Berenson JR; Yellin O; Blumenstein B; Bojanower D; Croopnick J; Aboulafia D; Upadhyaya G; Spadaccini C
Diagn Pathol; 2011 Mar; 6():23. PubMed ID: 21429220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a powered bone marrow biopsy device with a manual system: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Bucher CM; Lehmann T; Tichelli A; Tzankov A; Dirnhofer S; Passweg J; Rovó A
J Clin Pathol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 23105124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy and safety of bone marrow aspiration and biopsy using fluoroscopic guidance and a drill-powered needle: clinical experience from 775 cases.
Long JR; Stensby JD; Wiesner EL; Bryson WN; Hillen TJ; Jennings JW
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5964-5970. PubMed ID: 32518988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone marrow solid core biopsy needle: a critical assessment of the utility, benefits and limitations of the instruments employed in current day haematology and oncology.
Islam A
J Clin Pathol; 2018 Jun; 71(6):475-482. PubMed ID: 29217729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of canine core bone marrow biopsies from multiple sites using different techniques and needles.
Abrams-Ogg AC; Defarges A; Foster RA; Bienzle D
Vet Clin Pathol; 2012 Jun; 41(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 22486437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of feline core bone marrow biopsies from different sites using 2 techniques and needles.
Abrams-Ogg AC; Defarges A; Bienzle D
Vet Clin Pathol; 2014 Mar; 43(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 24471813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of the Use of a Mallet during Bone Marrow Biopsy Collection on Specimen Quality: A Quality Improvement Project.
Mauzo SH; Golardi N; Baxter AJ; Sultana S; Nguyen ND; Zhang R; Kott MM; Zvavanjanja RC; Chen L
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2018 Jul; 48(4):517-521. PubMed ID: 30143496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between 1-needle technique versus 2-needle technique for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy procedures.
Al-Ibraheemi A; Pham T; Chen L; Syklawer E; Quesada A; Wahed A; Nedelcu E; Nguyen AN
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Jul; 137(7):974-8. PubMed ID: 23808470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality and cost comparison of powered versus manual bone marrow biopsy devices in patients with myelofibrosis.
Maiti A; Short NJ; Verstovsek S; Powers CA; Fullmer CA; Reyes SR; Bueso-Ramos CE
Leuk Lymphoma; 2017 Oct; 58(10):2508-2510. PubMed ID: 28264600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone marrow aspiration before bone marrow core biopsy using the same bone marrow biopsy needle: a good or bad practice?
Islam A
J Clin Pathol; 2007 Feb; 60(2):212-5. PubMed ID: 16751305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT guided bone biopsy using a battery powered intraosseous device.
Schnapauff D; Marnitz T; Freyhardt P; Collettini F; Hartwig K; Jöhrens K; Hamm B; Kroencke T; Gebauer B
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2013 Oct; 36(5):1405-10. PubMed ID: 23580120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Needle aspiration and biopsy in the diagnosis and monitoring of bone marrow diseases.
Hodges A; Koury MJ
Clin Lab Sci; 1996; 9(6):349-53. PubMed ID: 10165116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Evaluation of the new bone marrow biopsy device, Jamshidi needle. Clinical importance of the bone marrow biopsy (author's transl)].
Harada K; Adachi M; Myster SH
Rinsho Ketsueki; 1976 Sep; 17(9):956-62. PubMed ID: 1034755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical experience with a new specimen capturing bone marrow biopsy needle.
Goldenberg AS; Tiesinga JJ
Am J Hematol; 2001 Nov; 68(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 11754401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
