81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2806274)
1. Comparison of Telebrix Gastro and Gastrografin in abdominal computed tomography.
van Waes PF; Feldberg MA; Barth P
Eur J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 9(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 2806274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Telebrix: a better-tasting oral contrast agent for abdominal computed tomography.
Bach DB
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1991 Apr; 42(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 2039963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Inter-individual testing of water-soluble oral contrast media with reference to their diagnostic value, side effects and taste].
Stäbler A; Fink U; Siuda S; Neville S
Rontgenblatter; 1989 May; 42(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 2502828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pretreatment of patients requiring oral contrast abdominal computed tomography with antiemetics: a randomized controlled trial of efficacy.
Garra G; Singer AJ; Bamber D; Chohan J; Troxell R; Thode HC
Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 53(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 18640743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Oral administration of intravenous contrast media: a tasty alternative to conventional oral contrast media in computed tomography].
Diederichs G; Franiel T; Asbach P; Romano V; Hamm B; Rogalla P
Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 17786895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. A double-blind randomized study comparing an aqueous solution of amidotrizoate, an aqueous solution of iohexol and a viscous solution of iohexol.
Lönnemark M; Magnusson A; Ahlström H
Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 8369192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.
Bernardino ME; Fishman EK; Jeffrey RB; Brown PC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Cerebral angiography with ioglicinate (Rayvist). A double blind study of image quality and clinical side effects (author's transl)].
Stoeter P; Voigt K
Radiologe; 1979 Nov; 19(11):494-8. PubMed ID: 388513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pharmacokinetics of contrast media: experimental results in dog and man with CT implications.
Gardeur D; Lautrou J; Millard JC; Berger N; Metzger J
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1980 Apr; 4(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 7365016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of pain and heat sensation of contrast media in aortofemoral angiography: meglumine-amidotrizoate (Angiografin) mixed with lidocaine versus sodium-meglumine-ioxaglate (Hexabrix).
Heystraten FM; van den Berg FG; Mulderije ED
Diagn Imaging; 1983; 52(2-3):141-4. PubMed ID: 6851813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of 2 positive and 1 negative oral contrast media for abdominal CT diagnosis].
Zwaan M; Gmelin E
Rontgenblatter; 1989 May; 42(5):219-23. PubMed ID: 2756307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acceptability of oral iodinated contrast media: a head-to-head comparison of four media.
Pollentine A; Ngan-Soo E; McCoubrie P
Br J Radiol; 2013 May; 86(1025):20120636. PubMed ID: 23564884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bowel opacification for abdominal computed tomography in children: a clinical trial of oral Telebrix 38.
Tannous WN; Azouz EM
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1991 Apr; 42(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 2039951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Iohexol and ioxithalamate for intravenous urography. A comparative parallel study.
Egeblad M; Nielsen NT; Fries J; Laulund S
Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 5(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 3896801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bowel opacification using "Telebrix 38" for CT scanning.
Azouz EM; Hassell P; Nogrady MB; Di Paolo M
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1982 Dec; 33(4):233-5. PubMed ID: 7161301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low-attenuation oral GI contrast agents in abdominal-pelvic computed tomography.
Hebert JJ; Taylor AJ; Winter TC; Reichelderfer M; Weichert JP
Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 16252139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Contrast enhancement].
Wójtowicz J
Pol Przegl Radiol Med Nukl; 1982; 46(4):179-86. PubMed ID: 6763211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography. A double blind clinical trial comparing a non-ionic (iohexol) and an ionic (metrizoate) contrast medium.
Skalpe IO; Ostensen HM
Eur J Radiol; 1984 Feb; 4(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 6373261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The rescue of iodine allergy by contrast enhanced CT].
Shen S; Xiao E; Tan L; Wu Y
Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 1998; 23(2):179-80. PubMed ID: 10681839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
