These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2806274)

  • 1. Comparison of Telebrix Gastro and Gastrografin in abdominal computed tomography.
    van Waes PF; Feldberg MA; Barth P
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 9(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 2806274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Telebrix: a better-tasting oral contrast agent for abdominal computed tomography.
    Bach DB
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1991 Apr; 42(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 2039963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Inter-individual testing of water-soluble oral contrast media with reference to their diagnostic value, side effects and taste].
    Stäbler A; Fink U; Siuda S; Neville S
    Rontgenblatter; 1989 May; 42(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 2502828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pretreatment of patients requiring oral contrast abdominal computed tomography with antiemetics: a randomized controlled trial of efficacy.
    Garra G; Singer AJ; Bamber D; Chohan J; Troxell R; Thode HC
    Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 53(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 18640743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Oral administration of intravenous contrast media: a tasty alternative to conventional oral contrast media in computed tomography].
    Diederichs G; Franiel T; Asbach P; Romano V; Hamm B; Rogalla P
    Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 17786895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. A double-blind randomized study comparing an aqueous solution of amidotrizoate, an aqueous solution of iohexol and a viscous solution of iohexol.
    Lönnemark M; Magnusson A; Ahlström H
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 8369192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.
    Bernardino ME; Fishman EK; Jeffrey RB; Brown PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cerebral angiography with ioglicinate (Rayvist). A double blind study of image quality and clinical side effects (author's transl)].
    Stoeter P; Voigt K
    Radiologe; 1979 Nov; 19(11):494-8. PubMed ID: 388513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pharmacokinetics of contrast media: experimental results in dog and man with CT implications.
    Gardeur D; Lautrou J; Millard JC; Berger N; Metzger J
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1980 Apr; 4(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 7365016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of pain and heat sensation of contrast media in aortofemoral angiography: meglumine-amidotrizoate (Angiografin) mixed with lidocaine versus sodium-meglumine-ioxaglate (Hexabrix).
    Heystraten FM; van den Berg FG; Mulderije ED
    Diagn Imaging; 1983; 52(2-3):141-4. PubMed ID: 6851813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of 2 positive and 1 negative oral contrast media for abdominal CT diagnosis].
    Zwaan M; Gmelin E
    Rontgenblatter; 1989 May; 42(5):219-23. PubMed ID: 2756307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acceptability of oral iodinated contrast media: a head-to-head comparison of four media.
    Pollentine A; Ngan-Soo E; McCoubrie P
    Br J Radiol; 2013 May; 86(1025):20120636. PubMed ID: 23564884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
    Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bowel opacification for abdominal computed tomography in children: a clinical trial of oral Telebrix 38.
    Tannous WN; Azouz EM
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1991 Apr; 42(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 2039951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Iohexol and ioxithalamate for intravenous urography. A comparative parallel study.
    Egeblad M; Nielsen NT; Fries J; Laulund S
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 5(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 3896801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bowel opacification using "Telebrix 38" for CT scanning.
    Azouz EM; Hassell P; Nogrady MB; Di Paolo M
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1982 Dec; 33(4):233-5. PubMed ID: 7161301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low-attenuation oral GI contrast agents in abdominal-pelvic computed tomography.
    Hebert JJ; Taylor AJ; Winter TC; Reichelderfer M; Weichert JP
    Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 16252139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Contrast enhancement].
    Wójtowicz J
    Pol Przegl Radiol Med Nukl; 1982; 46(4):179-86. PubMed ID: 6763211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography. A double blind clinical trial comparing a non-ionic (iohexol) and an ionic (metrizoate) contrast medium.
    Skalpe IO; Ostensen HM
    Eur J Radiol; 1984 Feb; 4(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 6373261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The rescue of iodine allergy by contrast enhanced CT].
    Shen S; Xiao E; Tan L; Wu Y
    Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 1998; 23(2):179-80. PubMed ID: 10681839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.