These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28063131)

  • 1. Individual classification of strong risk attitudes: An application across lottery types and age groups.
    Kellen D; Mata R; Davis-Stober CP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1341-1349. PubMed ID: 28063131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the Flexibility of Basic Risk Attitudes in Monkeys.
    Farashahi S; Azab H; Hayden B; Soltani A
    J Neurosci; 2018 May; 38(18):4383-4398. PubMed ID: 29626169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk attitudes in a changing environment: An evolutionary model of the fourfold pattern of risk preferences.
    Mallpress DE; Fawcett TW; Houston AI; McNamara JM
    Psychol Rev; 2015 Apr; 122(2):364-75. PubMed ID: 25844877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age differences in risky choice: a meta-analysis.
    Mata R; Josef AK; Samanez-Larkin GR; Hertwig R
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2011 Oct; 1235():18-29. PubMed ID: 22023565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk preferences and aging: the "certainty effect" in older adults' decision making.
    Mather M; Mazar N; Gorlick MA; Lighthall NR; Burgeno J; Schoeke A; Ariely D
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Dec; 27(4):801-16. PubMed ID: 23066800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expected utility theory and risky choices with health outcomes.
    Hellinger FJ
    Med Care; 1989 Mar; 27(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 2927183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk-Taking Attitudes of Patients who Seek Health Care: An Exploratory Approach through Lottery Games.
    Martín-Fernández J; Ariza-Cardiel G; Polentinos-Castro E; Gil-Lacruz AI; Gómez-Gascón T; Domínguez-Bidagor J; Del-Cura-González I
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2016 Mar; 90():e1-e14. PubMed ID: 27225445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The sure thing: The role of integral affect in risky choice framing.
    Young NA; Shuster MM; Mikels JA
    Emotion; 2019 Sep; 19(6):1035-1043. PubMed ID: 30138007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Risk and Ambiguity Attitudes.
    Blankenstein NE; Peper JS; Crone EA; van Duijvenvoorde ACK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 29(11):1845-1859. PubMed ID: 28686139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age differences in risk attitude are shaped by option complexity.
    Zilker V; Hertwig R; Pachur T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Sep; 149(9):1644-1683. PubMed ID: 32027153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risky decision making across three arenas of choice: are younger and older adults differently susceptible to framing effects?
    Rönnlund M; Karlsson E; Laggnäs E; Larsson L; Lindström T
    J Gen Psychol; 2005 Jan; 132(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 15685961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Of black swans and tossed coins: is the description-experience gap in risky choice limited to rare events?
    Ludvig EA; Spetch ML
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(6):e20262. PubMed ID: 21673807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dealing With Uncertainty: Testing Risk- and Ambiguity-Attitude Across Adolescence.
    Blankenstein NE; Crone EA; van den Bos W; van Duijvenvoorde AC
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2016; 41(1-2):77-92. PubMed ID: 27028162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risky-choice behavior: a life-span analysis.
    Holliday SG
    Int J Aging Hum Dev; 1988; 27(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 3254356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Divergence and Convergence of Risky Decision Making Across Prospective Gains and Losses: Preferences and Strategies.
    Kurnianingsih YA; Mullette-Gillman OA
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():457. PubMed ID: 26733779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring the subjective value of risky and ambiguous options using experimental economics and functional MRI methods.
    Levy I; Rosenberg Belmaker L; Manson K; Tymula A; Glimcher PW
    J Vis Exp; 2012 Sep; (67):e3724. PubMed ID: 23022992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age differences in the effect of framing on risky choice: A meta-analysis.
    Best R; Charness N
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Sep; 30(3):688-98. PubMed ID: 26098168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The discrepancy between risky and riskless utilities: a matter of framing?
    Stalmeier PF; Bezembinder TG
    Med Decis Making; 1999; 19(4):435-47. PubMed ID: 10520682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Music through the ages: Trends in musical engagement and preferences from adolescence through middle adulthood.
    Bonneville-Roussy A; Rentfrow PJ; Xu MK; Potter J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Oct; 105(4):703-17. PubMed ID: 23895269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Framing effects and risk-sensitive decision making.
    Mishra S; Gregson M; Lalumière ML
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Feb; 103(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 22229776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.