These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28063136)

  • 1. Intervening response events between identification targets do not always turn repetition benefits into repetition costs.
    Hilchey MD; Rajsic J; Huffman G; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Apr; 79(3):807-819. PubMed ID: 28063136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does feature-based attention play a role in the episodic retrieval of event files?
    Huffman G; Hilchey MD; Weidler BJ; Mills M; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):241-251. PubMed ID: 32077740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition.
    Koch I; Frings C; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):570-579. PubMed ID: 28286905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response to an intervening event reverses nonspatial repetition effects in 2AFC tasks: nonspatial IOR?
    Spadaro A; He C; Milliken B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):331-49. PubMed ID: 22160785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociating Orienting Biases From Integration Effects With Eye Movements.
    Hilchey MD; Rajsic J; Huffman G; Klein RM; Pratt J
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Mar; 29(3):328-339. PubMed ID: 29298120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The representational basis of positive and negative repetition effects.
    Cochrane BA; Milliken B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):252-263. PubMed ID: 31697156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Salience drives non-spatial feature repetition effects in cueing tasks.
    Huffman G; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):212-222. PubMed ID: 27743261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selective attention modulates neural substrates of repetition priming and "implicit" visual memory: suppressions and enhancements revealed by FMRI.
    Vuilleumier P; Schwartz S; Duhoux S; Dolan RJ; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1245-60. PubMed ID: 16197681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution.
    Schuch S; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 20719288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repetition or alternation of context influences sequential congruency effect depending on the presence of contingency.
    Atalay NB; Inan AB
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):490-507. PubMed ID: 26908247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Location and shape in inhibition of return.
    Riggio L; Patteri I; Umiltà C
    Psychol Res; 2004 Feb; 68(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 12827352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binding time: Investigations on the integration of visual stimulus duration.
    Köllnberger K; Bogon J; Dreisbach G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Oct; 76(10):2312-2328. PubMed ID: 36377802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of global and local task repetition proportion on n - 2 repetition costs.
    Scheil J; Kleinsorge T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):579-588. PubMed ID: 29431022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Task dependent modulation of exogenous attention: effects of target duration and intervening events.
    Martín-Arévalo E; Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1148-60. PubMed ID: 23709067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus-category and response-repetition effects in task switching: an evaluation of four explanations.
    Druey MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):125-46. PubMed ID: 23895451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial negative priming: Location or response?
    Neill WT; Kleinsmith AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2411-2419. PubMed ID: 27465862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speeded responses to audiovisual signal changes result from bimodal integration.
    Schröger E; Widmann A
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Nov; 35(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 9844437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inhibition of return: a "depth-blind" mechanism?
    Casagrande M; Barbato M; Mereu S; Martella D; Marotta A; Theeuwes J; Collinson SL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 22465912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Much ado about nothing: Capturing attention toward locations without new perceptual events.
    Hilchey MD; Taylor JE; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1923-1927. PubMed ID: 27854455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.