These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28063820)

  • 1. Assessment of ocular discomfort caused by 5 shampoos using the Slug Mucosal Irritation test.
    Petit JY; Doré V; Marignac G; Perrot S
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Apr; 40():243-247. PubMed ID: 28063820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The slug mucosal irritation (SMI) assay: development of a screening tool for the evaluation of ocular discomfort caused by shampoos.
    Lenoir J; Claerhout I; Kestelyn P; Klomp A; Remon JP; Adriaens E
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Dec; 25(8):1919-25. PubMed ID: 21741469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CON4EI: Slug Mucosal Irritation (SMI) test method for hazard identification and labelling of serious eye damaging and eye irritating chemicals.
    Adriaens E; Guest R; Willoughby JA; Fochtman P; Kandarova H; Verstraelen S; Van Rompay AR
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Jun; 49():77-89. PubMed ID: 28870540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Slug Mucosal Irritation (SMI) assay: a tool for the evaluation of nasal discomfort.
    Lenoir J; Bachert C; Remon JP; Adriaens E
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Sep; 27(6):1954-61. PubMed ID: 23845896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. HET-CAM test. Application to shampoos in developing countries.
    Derouiche MTT; Abdennour S
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Dec; 45(Pt 3):393-396. PubMed ID: 28602853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of five in vitro tests for assessing the eye irritation potential of hair-care products.
    Jones PA; Budynsky E; Cooper KJ; Decker D; Griffiths HA; Fentem JH
    Altern Lab Anim; 2001; 29(6):669-92. PubMed ID: 11709042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of ocular irritancy of prototype shampoo formulations by the isolated rabbit eye (IRE) test and bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay.
    Cooper KJ; Earl LK; Harbell J; Raabe H
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2001 Apr; 15(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 11287169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New aspects of the Slug Mucosal Irritation assay: predicting nasal stinging, itching and burning sensations.
    Lenoir J; Adriaens E; Remon JP
    J Appl Toxicol; 2011 Oct; 31(7):640-8. PubMed ID: 21132841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of the eye irritation potential of shampoos using the in vitro SIRC cell toxicity test.
    North-Root H; Yackovich F; Demetrulias J; Gacula M; Heinze JE
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):271-3. PubMed ID: 4040076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Slug species- and population-specific effects on the end points of the Slug Mucosal Irritation test.
    Dhondt MM; Adriaens E; Pinceel J; Jordaens K; Backeljau T; Remon JP
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Jun; 20(4):448-57. PubMed ID: 16226427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Refinement of the Slug Mucosal Irritation test as an alternative screening test for eye irritation.
    Adriaens E; Dhondt MM; Remon JP
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2005 Feb; 19(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 15582359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survey of ocular irritation predictive capacity using Chorioallantoic Membrane Vascular Assay (CAMVA) and Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) test historical data for 319 personal care products over fourteen years.
    Donahue DA; Kaufman LE; Avalos J; Simion FA; Cerven DR
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Mar; 25(2):563-72. PubMed ID: 21147215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evaluation of the local tolerance of vaginal formulations containing dapivirine using the Slug Mucosal Irritation test and the rabbit vaginal irritation test.
    Dhondt MM; Adriaens E; Roey JV; Remon JP
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2005 Aug; 60(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 15996583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of an alternative mucosal irritation test using slugs.
    Adriaens E; Remon JP
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2002 Jul; 182(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 12140180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Successful prevalidation of the slug mucosal irritation test to assess the eye irritation potency of chemicals.
    Adriaens E; Bytheway H; De Wever B; Eschrich D; Guest R; Hansen E; Vanparys P; Schoeters G; Warren N; Weltens R; Whittingham A; Remon JP
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Aug; 22(5):1285-96. PubMed ID: 18406103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New aspects of the slug mucosal irritation (SMI) assay: predicting ocular stinging, itching and burning sensations.
    Lenoir J; Adriaens E; Remon JP; Claerhout I; Kestelyn R
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2011; (317):47-8. PubMed ID: 21560856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mucosal irritation potential of personal lubricants relates to product osmolality as detected by the slug mucosal irritation assay.
    Adriaens E; Remon JP
    Sex Transm Dis; 2008 May; 35(5):512-6. PubMed ID: 18356773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using the Slug Mucosal Irritation Assay to Investigate the Tolerability of Tablet Excipients on Human Skin in the Context of the Use of a Nipple Shield Delivery System.
    Kendall R; Lenoir J; Gerrard S; Scheuerle RL; Slater NK; Tuleu C
    Pharm Res; 2017 Apr; 34(4):687-695. PubMed ID: 28194635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toxicological studies on bestatin. IV. Studies on antigenicity, ocular mucosal irritation and mutagenicity.
    Sakakibara T; Sakai Y; Sakamoto M; Ito K; Hagiwara T; Furuta Y; Takahashi K; Tsubosaki M; Matsuda A; Konoha N
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1983 Nov; 36(11):3194-203. PubMed ID: 6674531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The mucosal toxicity of different benzalkonium chloride analogues evaluated with an alternative test using slugs.
    Adriaens E; Dierckens K; Bauters TG; Nelis HJ; van Goethem F; Vanparys P; Remon JP
    Pharm Res; 2001 Jul; 18(7):937-42. PubMed ID: 11496952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.