325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28063844)
1. Automatic 3D aortic annulus sizing by computed tomography in the planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Queirós S; Dubois C; Morais P; Adriaenssens T; Fonseca JC; Vilaça JL; D'hooge J
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 28063844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated 3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multidetector computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Watanabe Y; Morice MC; Bouvier E; Leong T; Hayashida K; Lefèvre T; Hovasse T; Romano M; Chevalier B; Donzeau-Gouge P; Farge A; Cormier B; Garot P
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 6(9):955-64. PubMed ID: 23954060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for aortic annular sizing in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Sherif MA; Ince H; Maniuc O; Reiter T; Voelker W; Ertl G; Öner A
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2015 Dec; 15():181. PubMed ID: 26715337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated 3D analysis of multislice computed tomography to define the line of perpendicularity of the aortic annulus and of the implanted valve: benefit on planning transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Samin M; Juthier F; Van Belle C; Agostoni P; Kluin J; Stella PR; Ramjankhan F; Budde RP; Sieswerda G; Algeri E; Elkalioubie A; Belkacemi A; Bertrand ME; Doevendans PA; Van Belle E
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 83(1):E119-27. PubMed ID: 23592336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reproducibility of aortic annulus sizing using a dedicated three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction tool in patients evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Stortecky S; Heg D; Gloekler S; Wenaweser P; Windecker S; Buellesfeld L
EuroIntervention; 2014 Jul; 10(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 24273249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated 3D analysis of pre-procedural MDCT to predict annulus plane angulation and C-arm positioning: benefit on procedural outcome in patients referred for TAVR.
Samim M; Stella PR; Agostoni P; Kluin J; Ramjankhan F; Budde RP; Sieswerda G; Algeri E; van Belle C; Elkalioubie A; Juthier F; Belkacemi A; Bertrand ME; Doevendans PA; Van Belle E
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 6(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 23489538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography on prosthesis sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Husser O; Rauch S; Endemann DH; Resch M; Nunez J; Bodi V; Hilker M; Schmid C; Riegger GA; Luchner A; Hengstenberg C
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Nov; 80(6):956-63. PubMed ID: 22419651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT evaluation prior to transapical aortic valve replacement: semi-automatic versus manual image segmentation.
Foldyna B; Jungert C; Luecke C; von Aspern K; Boehmer-Lasthaus S; Rueth EM; Grothoff M; Nitzsche S; Gutberlet M; Mohr FW; Lehmkuhl L
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Aug; 31(6):1233-42. PubMed ID: 25893746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic aortic root landmark detection in CTA images for preprocedural planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Elattar M; Wiegerinck E; van Kesteren F; Dubois L; Planken N; Vanbavel E; Baan J; Marquering H
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 32(3):501-11. PubMed ID: 26498339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multidetector CT predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Freeman M; Webb JG; Willson AB; Wheeler M; Blanke P; Moss RR; Thompson CR; Munt B; Norgaard BL; Yang TH; Min JK; Poulsen S; Hansson NC; Binder RK; Toggweiler S; Hague C; Wood DA; Pibarot P; Leipsic J
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(4):248-55. PubMed ID: 24148778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of aortic valve tract dynamics using automatic tracking of 3D transesophageal echocardiographic images.
Queirós S; Morais P; Fehske W; Papachristidis A; Voigt JU; Fonseca JC; D'hooge J; Vilaça JL
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 May; 35(5):881-895. PubMed ID: 30701439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal prosthesis sizing in transcatheter aortic valve implantation by exclusive use of three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography.
Kretzschmar D; Lauten A; Goebel B; Doenst T; Poerner TC; Ferrari M; Figulla HR; Hamadanchi A
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2016 Mar; 36(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 25316588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of a Novel Software Tool for Automatic Aortic Annular Sizing in Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiographic Images.
Queirós S; Morais P; Dubois C; Voigt JU; Fehske W; Kuhn A; Achenbach T; Fonseca JC; Vilaça JL; D'hooge J
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2018 Apr; 31(4):515-525.e5. PubMed ID: 29625649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional multidetector computed tomography versus conventional 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for annular sizing in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Influence on postprocedural paravalvular aortic regurgitation.
Hansson NC; Thuesen L; Hjortdal VE; Leipsic J; Andersen HR; Poulsen SH; Webb JG; Christiansen EH; Rasmussen LE; Krusell LR; Terp K; Klaaborg KE; Tang M; Lassen JF; Bøtker HE; Nørgaard BL
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 82(6):977-86. PubMed ID: 23703899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Objective quantification of aortic valvular structures by cardiac computed tomography angiography in patients considered for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Korosoglou G; Gitsioudis G; Waechter-Stehle I; Weese J; Krumsdorf U; Chorianopoulos E; Hosch W; Kauczor HU; Katus HA; Bekeredjian R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jan; 81(1):148-59. PubMed ID: 23281089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is equal to contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography for correct aortic sizing before transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Bernhardt P; Rodewald C; Seeger J; Gonska B; Buckert D; Radermacher M; Hombach V; Rottbauer W; Wöhrle J
Clin Res Cardiol; 2016 Mar; 105(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 26395021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic Estimation of Optimal Deployment of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using Computed Tomography.
Kerner A; Abadi S; Dotan R; Javitt M; Aronson D; Lessick J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Mar; 26(2):130-138. PubMed ID: 28820541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging techniques for measurement of aortic annulus diameters before transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Altiok E; Koos R; Schröder J; Brehmer K; Hamada S; Becker M; Mahnken AH; Almalla M; Dohmen G; Autschbach R; Marx N; Hoffmann R
Heart; 2011 Oct; 97(19):1578-84. PubMed ID: 21700756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of institutional volume and experience with CT interpretation on sizing of transcatheter aortic valves: A multicenter retrospective study.
Verma DR; Pershad Y; Pershad A; Fang K; Gellert G; Morris MF
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):566-570. PubMed ID: 27641485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conformational pulsatile changes of the aortic annulus: impact on prosthesis sizing by computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Blanke P; Russe M; Leipsic J; Reinöhl J; Ebersberger U; Suranyi P; Siepe M; Pache G; Langer M; Schoepf UJ
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Sep; 5(9):984-94. PubMed ID: 22995887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
