These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1095 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28064081)

  • 1. Accuracy comparison of several common implicit solvent models and their implementations in the context of protein-ligand binding.
    Katkova EV; Onufriev AV; Aguilar B; Sulimov VB
    J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Mar; 72():70-80. PubMed ID: 28064081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computations of Absolute Solvation Free Energies of Small Molecules Using Explicit and Implicit Solvent Model.
    Shivakumar D; Deng Y; Roux B
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2009 Apr; 5(4):919-30. PubMed ID: 26609601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protein-Ligand Electrostatic Binding Free Energies from Explicit and Implicit Solvation.
    Izadi S; Aguilar B; Onufriev AV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Sep; 11(9):4450-9. PubMed ID: 26575935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accurate predictions of nonpolar solvation free energies require explicit consideration of binding-site hydration.
    Genheden S; Mikulskis P; Hu L; Kongsted J; Söderhjelm P; Ryde U
    J Am Chem Soc; 2011 Aug; 133(33):13081-92. PubMed ID: 21728337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generalized Born and Explicit Solvent Models for Free Energy Calculations in Organic Solvents: Cyclodextrin Dimerization.
    Zhang H; Tan T; van der Spoel D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Nov; 11(11):5103-13. PubMed ID: 26574308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grid-Based Surface Generalized Born Model for Calculation of Electrostatic Binding Free Energies.
    Forouzesh N; Izadi S; Onufriev AV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Oct; 57(10):2505-2513. PubMed ID: 28786669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining the polarizable Drude force field with a continuum electrostatic Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvation model.
    Aleksandrov A; Lin FY; Roux B; MacKerell AD
    J Comput Chem; 2018 Aug; 39(22):1707-1719. PubMed ID: 29737546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generalized Born implicit solvent models for small molecule hydration free energies.
    Brieg M; Setzler J; Albert S; Wenzel W
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2017 Jan; 19(2):1677-1685. PubMed ID: 27995260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Solvation forces on biomolecular structures: a comparison of explicit solvent and Poisson-Boltzmann models.
    Wagoner J; Baker NA
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Oct; 25(13):1623-9. PubMed ID: 15264256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Secondary structure bias in generalized Born solvent models: comparison of conformational ensembles and free energy of solvent polarization from explicit and implicit solvation.
    Roe DR; Okur A; Wickstrom L; Hornak V; Simmerling C
    J Phys Chem B; 2007 Feb; 111(7):1846-57. PubMed ID: 17256983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Continuum solvation models in the linear interaction energy method.
    Carlsson J; Andér M; Nervall M; Aqvist J
    J Phys Chem B; 2006 Jun; 110(24):12034-41. PubMed ID: 16800513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Implicit and Explicit Solvent Models for the Calculation of Solvation Free Energy in Organic Solvents.
    Zhang J; Zhang H; Wu T; Wang Q; van der Spoel D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Mar; 13(3):1034-1043. PubMed ID: 28245118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postprocessing of docked protein-ligand complexes using implicit solvation models.
    Lindström A; Edvinsson L; Johansson A; Andersson CD; Andersson IE; Raubacher F; Linusson A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb; 51(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 21309544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Connecting free energy surfaces in implicit and explicit solvent: an efficient method to compute conformational and solvation free energies.
    Deng N; Zhang BW; Levy RM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jun; 11(6):2868-78. PubMed ID: 26236174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of the FACTS solvation model for protein-ligand docking calculations. Application to EADock.
    Zoete V; Grosdidier A; Cuendet M; Michielin O
    J Mol Recognit; 2010; 23(5):457-61. PubMed ID: 20101644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrostatics of ligand binding: parametrization of the generalized Born model and comparison with the Poisson-Boltzmann approach.
    Liu HY; Zou X
    J Phys Chem B; 2006 May; 110(18):9304-13. PubMed ID: 16671749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trypsin-ligand binding free energies from explicit and implicit solvent simulations with polarizable potential.
    Jiao D; Zhang J; Duke RE; Li G; Schnieders MJ; Ren P
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Aug; 30(11):1701-11. PubMed ID: 19399779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of MM/GBSA calculations based on explicit and implicit solvent simulations.
    Godschalk F; Genheden S; Söderhjelm P; Ryde U
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2013 May; 15(20):7731-9. PubMed ID: 23595060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling loop reorganization free energies of acetylcholinesterase: a comparison of explicit and implicit solvent models.
    Olson MA
    Proteins; 2004 Dec; 57(4):645-50. PubMed ID: 15481087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS, a new method for calculating conformational free energy that uses both dynamics simulations with an explicit solvent and an implicit solvent continuum model.
    Vorobjev YN; Almagro JC; Hermans J
    Proteins; 1998 Sep; 32(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 9726412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 55.