These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28064140)

  • 41. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
    Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comprehensive physical image quality evaluation of a selenium based digital x-ray imaging system for thorax radiography.
    Launders JH; Kengyelics SM; Cowen AR
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):986-97. PubMed ID: 9650189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An anthropomorphic phantom representing a prematurely born neonate for digital x-ray imaging using 3D printing: Proof of concept and comparison of image quality from different systems.
    Irnstorfer N; Unger E; Hojreh A; Homolka P
    Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):14357. PubMed ID: 31591433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of a low-dose neonatal chest radiographic system.
    Burton EM; Kirks DR; Strife JL; Henry GC; Kereiakes JG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Nov; 151(5):999-1002. PubMed ID: 3263032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dose optimisation in computed radiography.
    Schreiner-Karoussou A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):139-42. PubMed ID: 16461522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Image quality and dose differences caused by vendor-specific image processing of neonatal radiographs.
    Sensakovic WF; O'Dell MC; Letter H; Kohler N; Rop B; Cook J; Logsdon G; Varich L
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Oct; 46(11):1606-13. PubMed ID: 27488507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of the post-processing algorithms SimGrid and S-Enhance for paediatric intensive care patients and neonates.
    Krueger PC; Ebeling K; Waginger M; Glutig K; Scheithauer M; Schlattmann P; Proquitté H; Mentzel HJ
    Pediatr Radiol; 2022 May; 52(6):1029-1037. PubMed ID: 35192022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Radiation dose in digital chest radiography: comparison among three technologies.
    Saiani F; Ghirardi C; Rodella CA; Feroldi P; Chiesa A
    Radiol Med; 2004 Apr; 107(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 15103291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest].
    Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Problems associated with digital luminescence radiography in the neonate and young infant. Problems with digital radiography.
    Arthur RJ; Pease JN
    Pediatr Radiol; 1992; 22(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 1594310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A phantom for dose-image quality optimization in chest radiography.
    Vassileva J
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Oct; 75(898):837-42. PubMed ID: 12381693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Can digital selenium-based radiography in thoracic diagnosis replace the analog x-ray imaging technic?].
    Zähringer M; Krug B; Dölken W; Gossmann A; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1997 Jul; 167(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 9289041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image quality.
    Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 80(960):984-8. PubMed ID: 17940130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Increasing source-to-image distance to reduce radiation dose from digital radiography pelvic examinations.
    England A; Evans P; Harding L; Taylor EM; Charnock P; Williams G
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 25739106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Supine thoracic images with a mobile roentgen unit: comparison between the soft-ray and hard-ray technics].
    Prager P; Neumann D; Geiger K; Jaschke W; Diezler P; Brundin K
    Rontgenblatter; 1984 Dec; 37(12):409-13. PubMed ID: 6523005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Digital radiography of the chest by self-scanning linear diode arrays.
    Slasky BS; Sashin D; Horton JA; Sternglass EJ; Bron KM; Deutsch M; Herron JM; Kennedy WH; Boyer JW; Girdany BR
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 2958064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Pediatric thoracic CT angiography at 70 kV: a phantom study to investigate the effects on image quality and radiation dose.
    MacDougall RD; Kleinman PL; Yu L; Lee EY
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Jul; 46(8):1114-9. PubMed ID: 26987734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Low-dose digital computed radiography in pediatric chest imaging.
    Kogutt MS; Jones JP; Perkins DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):775-9. PubMed ID: 3262278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Neonatal doses from X ray examinations by birth weight in a neonatal intensive care unit.
    Ono K; Akahane K; Aota T; Hada M; Takano Y; Kai M; Kusama T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 103(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 12593435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.