These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28064250)

  • 1. Novel method for electrode-tissue contact measurement with multi-electrode catheters.
    van Es R; Hauck J; van Driel VJHM; Neven K; van Wessel H; A Doevendans P; Wittkampf FHM
    Europace; 2018 Jan; 20(1):149-156. PubMed ID: 28064250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Locations of high contact force during left atrial mapping in atrial fibrillation patients: electrogram amplitude and impedance are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force for ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Nakagawa H; Kautzner J; Natale A; Peichl P; Cihak R; Wichterle D; Ikeda A; Santangeli P; Di Biase L; Jackman WM
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2013 Aug; 6(4):746-53. PubMed ID: 23873143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vivo contact force analysis and correlation with tissue impedance during left atrial mapping and catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Makimoto H; Lin T; Rillig A; Metzner A; Wohlmuth P; Arya A; Antz M; Mathew S; Deiss S; Wissner E; Rausch P; Bardyszewski A; Kamioka M; Li X; Kuck KH; Ouyang F; Tilz RR
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Feb; 7(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 24363353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. First in human validation of impedance-based catheter tip-to-tissue contact assessment in the left atrium.
    Piorkowski C; Sih H; Sommer P; Miller SP; Gaspar T; Teplitsky L; Hindricks G
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1366-73. PubMed ID: 19602032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting catheter contact in the human left atrium and their impact on ablation efficacy.
    Ullah W; Hunter RJ; Baker V; Dhinoja MB; Sporton S; Earley MJ; Schilling RJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 25213917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of electrical coupling between cardiac ablation catheters and tissue.
    Deno DC; Sih HJ; Miller SP; Teplitsky LR; Kuenzi R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Mar; 61(3):765-74. PubMed ID: 24235298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of catheter tip-tissue contact on three-dimensional left atrial geometries: Relationship between the external structures and anatomic distortion of 3D fast anatomical mapping and high contact force guided images.
    Anjo N; Nakahara S; Okumura Y; Hori Y; Nagashima K; Komatsu T; Hayashi A; Kobayashi S; Sakai Y; Taguchi I
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 222():202-208. PubMed ID: 27497095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size.
    Ikeda A; Nakagawa H; Lambert H; Shah DC; Fonck E; Yulzari A; Sharma T; Pitha JV; Lazzara R; Jackman WM
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Dec; 7(6):1174-80. PubMed ID: 25381331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transmembraneous irrigation of multipolar radiofrequency ablation catheters: induction of linear lesions encircling the pulmonary vein ostium without the risk of coagulum formation?
    Weiss C; Stewart M; Franzen O; Rostock T; Becker J; Skarda JR; Meinertz T; Willems S
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2004 Jun; 10(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 15133356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Novel Measure of Local Impedance Predicts Catheter-Tissue Contact and Lesion Formation.
    Sulkin MS; Laughner JI; Hilbert S; Kapa S; Kosiuk J; Younan P; Romero I; Shuros A; Hamann JJ; Hindricks G; Bollmann A
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2018 Apr; 11(4):e005831. PubMed ID: 29618475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contact force and impedance decrease during ablation depends on catheter location and orientation: insights from pulmonary vein isolation using a contact force-sensing catheter.
    Knecht S; Reichlin T; Pavlovic N; Schaer B; Osswald S; Sticherling C; Kühne M
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Sep; 43(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 25925494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pulsed Field Ablation Using a Lattice Electrode for Focal Energy Delivery: Biophysical Characterization, Lesion Durability, and Safety Evaluation.
    Yavin H; Shapira-Daniels A; Barkagan M; Sroubek J; Shim D; Melidone R; Anter E
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2020 Jun; 13(6):e008580. PubMed ID: 32372696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo contact force measurements and correlation with left atrial anatomy during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Schluermann F; Krauss T; Biermann J; Hartmann M; Trolese L; Pache G; Bode C; Asbach S
    Europace; 2015 Oct; 17(10):1526-32. PubMed ID: 25745072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial complex-fractionated atrial electrograms ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation with phased radio frequency energy and multi-electrode catheters: efficacy and safety during 12 months follow-up.
    Mulder AA; Wijffels MC; Wever EF; Boersma LV
    Europace; 2011 Dec; 13(12):1695-702. PubMed ID: 21750096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanisms of pulmonary vein reconnection after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: the deterministic role of contact force and interlesion distance.
    Park CI; Lehrmann H; Keyl C; Weber R; Schiebeling J; Allgeier J; Schurr P; Shah A; Neumann FJ; Arentz T; Jadidi AS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Jul; 25(7):701-8. PubMed ID: 24575734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pulmonary vein isolation using the Rhythmia mapping system: Verification of intracardiac signals using the Orion mini-basket catheter.
    Anter E; Tschabrunn CM; Contreras-Valdes FM; Li J; Josephson ME
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Sep; 12(9):1927-34. PubMed ID: 26001505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial impedance decrease as an indicator of good catheter contact: insights from radiofrequency ablation with force sensing catheters.
    Reichlin T; Knecht S; Lane C; Kühne M; Nof E; Chopra N; Tadros TM; Reddy VY; Schaer B; John RM; Osswald S; Stevenson WG; Sticherling C; Michaud GF
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 Feb; 11(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 24177370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Site localization of painful lesions during radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary veins using circular multi-electrode catheters.
    Laish-Farkash A; Katz A; Cohen O; Osherov A; Bruocha S; Khalameizer V
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2016 Jan; 45(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 26552799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety of pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial complex fractionated atrial electrograms ablation for atrial fibrillation with phased radiofrequency energy and multi-electrode catheters.
    Mulder AA; Balt JC; Wijffels MC; Wever EF; Boersma LV
    Europace; 2012 Oct; 14(10):1433-40. PubMed ID: 22496340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between left atrium catheter contact force and pacing threshold.
    Barrio-López T; Ortiz M; Castellanos E; Lázaro C; Salas J; Madero S; Almendral J
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Aug; 49(2):147-155. PubMed ID: 28451774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.