These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 280644)

  • 41. Coated Vicryl synthetic absorbable sutures.
    Conn J; Beal JM
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1980 Jun; 150(6):843-4. PubMed ID: 6990525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Suture materials currently used in obstetric-gynecologic surgery in the United States: a questionnaire survey.
    Hartko WJ; Ghanekar G; Kemmann E
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Feb; 59(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 6281703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A comparative in vivo study of tissue reactions to four suturing materials.
    Kakoei S; Baghaei F; Dabiri S; Parirokh M; Kakooei S
    Iran Endod J; 2010; 5(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 23130030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A biologic comparison of polyglactin 910 and polyglycolic acid synthetic absorbable sutures.
    Craig PH; Williams JA; Davis KW; Magoun AD; Levy AJ; Bogdansky S; Jones JP
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jul; 141(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 1154207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Absorbable or nonabsorbable suture materials for closure of the dura mater?
    Vällfors B; Hansson HA; Svensson J
    Neurosurgery; 1981 Oct; 9(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 6272153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of 10-0 polyglycolic acid and polyglactin suture in rabbit limbal wounds.
    Sugar A
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1980 Jan; 11(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 6244525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Strength retention of chromic gut and synthetic absorbable sutures in a nonhealing synovial wound.
    Walton M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Jun; (267):294-8. PubMed ID: 1904335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Cosmetic outcome and surgical site infection rates of antibacterial absorbable (Polyglactin 910) suture compared to Chinese silk suture in breast cancer surgery: a randomized pilot research.
    Zhang ZT; Zhang HW; Fang XD; Wang LM; Li XX; Li YF; Sun XW; Carver J; Simpkins D; Shen J; Weisberg M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Mar; 124(5):719-24. PubMed ID: 21518565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Silk and polyglycolic acid in oral surgery: a comparative study.
    Sortino F; Lombardo C; Sciacca A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Mar; 105(3):e15-8. PubMed ID: 18280940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Bacterial adhesivity and tissue reactivity of synthetic materials: an experimental study in vitro and in vivo].
    Giardino R; Rocca M; Fini M; Buscaroli S; Arciola CR; Nicoli Aldini N; Morrone G
    G Chir; 1992 Apr; 13(4):248-9. PubMed ID: 1322151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl).
    Trimbos JB; Niggebrugge A; Trimbos R; Van Rijssel EJ
    Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 7662774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Running sutures anchored with square knots are unreliable.
    Aanning HL; Van Osdol A; Allamargot C; Becker BE; Howard TC; Likness ML; Merkwan CE; Tarver DD
    Am J Surg; 2012 Sep; 204(3):384-8. PubMed ID: 22494881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Southmead perineal suture study. A randomized comparison of suture materials and suturing techniques for repair of perineal trauma.
    Mahomed K; Grant A; Ashurst H; James D
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Nov; 96(11):1272-80. PubMed ID: 2558705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Response of the oral mucosa in the rat to various suture materials most frequently used in periodontal surgery].
    Caride ER; Meiss A; Barros MR; Barros RE
    Rev Asoc Odontol Argent; 1981 Jun; 69(4):209-12. PubMed ID: 6273973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
    Rodeheaver GT; Beltran KA; Green CW; Faulkner BC; Stiles BM; Stanimir GW; Traeland H; Fried GM; Brown HC; Edlich RF
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1996; 6(3-4):181-98. PubMed ID: 10167360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Outcomes of irradiated polyglactin 910 Vicryl Rapide fast-absorbing suture in oral and scalp wounds.
    Aderriotis D; Sàndor GK
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1999 Jun; 65(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 10412244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Common bile duct healing. Do different absorbable sutures affect stricture formation and tensile strength?
    Sharp KW; Ross CB; Tillman VN; Dunn JF
    Arch Surg; 1989 Apr; 124(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 2930349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Experiences with polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) in general surgery.
    Blomstedt B; Jacobsson SI
    Acta Chir Scand; 1977; 143(5):259-63. PubMed ID: 596092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Trial of a synthetic absorbable suture, Polyglactin 910, in 100 urologic patients].
    Beurton D; Bronstein M
    J Urol Nephrol (Paris); 1979; 85(1-2):55-61. PubMed ID: 86613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Tie hard 2- an in-vitro comparison of first throw tension holding in twisted v straight-first throws; using Polyglycolic acid (Dexon S), Polyglactin 910 (Coated Vicryl).
    Kersey TL; Thaller VT
    Orbit; 2010 Aug; 29(4):194-6. PubMed ID: 20812835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.