These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28064551)

  • 1. FD-OCT and IVUS intravascular imaging modalities in peripheral vasculature.
    Spiliopoulos S; Kitrou P; Katsanos K; Karnabatidis D
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2017 Feb; 14(2):127-134. PubMed ID: 28064551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A post-market, multi-vessel evaluation of the imaging of peripheral arteries for diagnostic purposeS comparing optical Coherence tomogrApy and iNtravascular ultrasound imaging (SCAN).
    Pavillard E; Sewall L
    BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Feb; 20(1):18. PubMed ID: 32059702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variability in quantitative and qualitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound and frequency domain optical coherence tomography.
    Abnousi F; Waseda K; Kume T; Otake H; Kawarada O; Yong CM; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y; Yeung AC; Fearon WF
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E192-9. PubMed ID: 23412754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography guidance for optimal coronary stent implantation in comparison with intravascular ultrasound guidance.
    Habara M; Nasu K; Terashima M; Kaneda H; Yokota D; Ko E; Ito T; Kurita T; Tanaka N; Kimura M; Ito T; Kinoshita Y; Tsuchikane E; Asakura K; Asakura Y; Katoh O; Suzuki T
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 22456026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative precision of optical frequency domain imaging: direct comparison with frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
    Kobayashi Y; Kitahara H; Tanaka S; Okada K; Kimura T; Ikeno F; Yock PG; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2016 Apr; 31(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 26271203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Sirbu V; Musumeci G; Lortkipanidze N; Fujino Y; Wang W; Nakamura S; Erglis A; Guagliumi G; Costa MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 23517833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intracoronary imaging modalities for vulnerable plaques.
    Kato K; Yasutake M; Yonetsu T; Kim SJ; Xing L; Kratlian CM; Takano M; Mizuno K; Jang IK
    J Nippon Med Sch; 2011; 78(6):340-51. PubMed ID: 22197866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in detecting neointimal healing patterns after stent implantation.
    Kochman J; Pietrasik A; Rdzanak A; Jąkała J; Zasada W; Scibisz A; Kołtowski L; Proniewska K; Pociask E; Legutko J
    Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 24293141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective evaluation of optical coherence tomography in lower limb arteries compared with intravascular ultrasound.
    Eberhardt KM; Treitl M; Boesenecker K; Maxien D; Reiser M; Rieger J
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1499-508. PubMed ID: 23962439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hybrid intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography catheter for imaging of coronary atherosclerosis.
    Li BH; Leung AS; Soong A; Munding CE; Lee H; Thind AS; Munce NR; Wright GA; Rowsell CH; Yang VX; Strauss BH; Foster FS; Courtney BK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):494-507. PubMed ID: 22566368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo volumetric analysis of coronary stent using optical coherence tomography with a novel balloon occlusion-flushing catheter: a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Kawase Y; Hoshino K; Yoneyama R; McGregor J; Hajjar RJ; Jang IK; Hayase M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 31(10):1343-9. PubMed ID: 16223637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intravascular ultrasound guidance for peripheral vascular interventions.
    Scoccianti M; Verbin CS; Kopchok GE; Back MR; Donayre CE; Sinow RM; White RA
    J Endovasc Surg; 1994 Sep; 1():71-80. PubMed ID: 9234107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo comparison of Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasonography.
    Ramesh S; Papayannis A; Abdel-karim AR; Banerjee S; Brilakis E
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 24(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 22388302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
    Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Usefulness of Frequency Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Compared with Intravascular Ultrasound as a Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Kim IC; Yoon HJ; Shin ES; Kim MS; Park J; Cho YK; Park HS; Kim H; Nam CW; Han SW; Kim YN; Kim KB; Hur SH
    J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 29(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 26927366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anatomically correct three-dimensional coronary artery reconstruction using frequency domain optical coherence tomographic and angiographic data: head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound for endothelial shear stress assessment in humans.
    Papafaklis MI; Bourantas CV; Yonetsu T; Vergallo R; Kotsia A; Nakatani S; Lakkas LS; Athanasiou LS; Naka KK; Fotiadis DI; Feldman CL; Stone PH; Serruys PW; Jang IK; Michalis LK
    EuroIntervention; 2015 Aug; 11(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 24974809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency-domain intravascular optical coherence tomography of the femoropopliteal artery.
    Karnabatidis D; Katsanos K; Paraskevopoulos I; Diamantopoulos A; Spiliopoulos S; Siablis D
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2011 Dec; 34(6):1172-81. PubMed ID: 21191586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-vessel coronary artery disease evaluation by multimodality imaging with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) plus intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT).
    Fabris E; Kilic ID; Caiazzo G; Serdoz R; Sinagra G; Di Mario C
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Feb; 180():21-9. PubMed ID: 25438201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.