These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28065417)

  • 1. Assisted reproduction technique outcomes for fresh versus deferred cryopreserved day-2 embryo transfer: a retrospective matched cohort study.
    Bourdon M; Santulli P; Gayet V; Maignien C; Marcellin L; Pocate-Cheriet K; Chapron C
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2017 Mar; 34(3):248-257. PubMed ID: 28065417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are perinatal outcomes affected by blastocyst vitrification and warming?
    Barsky M; St Marie P; Rahil T; Markenson GR; Sites CK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):603.e1-603.e5. PubMed ID: 27287684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of vitrified-warmed day-4 embryos after day-3 cleavage-stage biopsy.
    Kahraman S; Candan ZN
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):636-41. PubMed ID: 20920891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Higher clinical pregnancy rates from frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers compared to fresh blastocyst transfers: a retrospective matched-cohort study.
    Özgür K; Berkkanoğlu M; Bulut H; Isikli A; Coetzee K
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Oct; 32(10):1483-90. PubMed ID: 26400506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers.
    Roy TK; Bradley CK; Bowman MC; McArthur SJ
    Fertil Steril; 2014 May; 101(5):1294-301. PubMed ID: 24582521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developmentally delayed cleavage-stage embryos maintain comparable implantation rates in frozen embryo transfers.
    Burks H; Buckbinder J; Francis-Hernandez M; Chung K; Jabara S; Bendikson K; Paulson R
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Oct; 32(10):1477-81. PubMed ID: 26347340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
    Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
    Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of blastocysts biopsied and vitrified once versus those cryopreserved twice for euploid blastocyst transfer.
    Taylor TH; Patrick JL; Gitlin SA; Michael Wilson J; Crain JL; Griffin DK
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Jul; 29(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 24794643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrospective analysis of outcomes following transfer of previously cryopreserved oocytes, pronuclear zygotes and supernumerary blastocysts.
    Hodes-Wertz B; Noyes N; Mullin C; McCaffrey C; Grifo JA
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Jul; 23(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 21550305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The deferred embryo transfer strategy improves cumulative pregnancy rates in endometriosis-related infertility: A retrospective matched cohort study.
    Bourdon M; Santulli P; Maignien C; Gayet V; Pocate-Cheriet K; Marcellin L; Chapron C
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194800. PubMed ID: 29630610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Freeze-all: enhanced outcomes with cryopreservation at the blastocyst stage versus pronuclear stage using slow-freeze techniques.
    Surrey E; Keller J; Stevens J; Gustofson R; Minjarez D; Schoolcraft W
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Sep; 21(3):411-7. PubMed ID: 20638905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors associated with birth outcomes from cryopreserved blastocysts: experience from 4,597 autologous transfers of 7,597 cryopreserved blastocysts.
    Richter KS; Ginsburg DK; Shipley SK; Lim J; Tucker MJ; Graham JR; Levy MJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):354-362.e2. PubMed ID: 27172399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Agonist depot versus OCP programming of frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis of freeze-all cycles.
    Ozgur K; Berkkanoglu M; Bulut H; Humaidan P; Coetzee K
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Feb; 33(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 26701802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cryopreserved embryo transfers suggest that endometrial receptivity may contribute to reduced success rates of later developing embryos.
    Richter KS; Shipley SK; McVearry I; Tucker MJ; Widra EA
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Oct; 86(4):862-6. PubMed ID: 16935284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony.
    Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Ross R
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17224151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Synchronization between embryo development and endometrium is a contributing factor for rescue ICSI outcome.
    Ming L; Liu P; Qiao J; Lian Y; Zheng X; Ren X; Huang J; Wu Y
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 May; 24(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 22480904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of artificial shrinkage (collapse) on the implantation potential of vitrified blastocysts.
    Van Landuyt L; Polyzos NP; De Munck N; Blockeel C; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2509-18. PubMed ID: 26364080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.
    Solé M; Santaló J; Boada M; Clua E; Rodríguez I; Martínez F; Coroleu B; Barri PN; Veiga A
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2087-92. PubMed ID: 23744895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perinatal outcomes after fresh versus vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: retrospective analysis.
    Ozgur K; Berkkanoglu M; Bulut H; Humaidan P; Coetzee K
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Oct; 104(4):899-907.e3. PubMed ID: 26211882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.