119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28066807)
1. Evaluation of Cross-Calibrated
Byrd DW; Doot RK; Allberg KC; MacDonald LR; McDougald WA; Elston BF; Linden HM; Kinahan PE
Tomography; 2016 Dec; 2(4):353-360. PubMed ID: 28066807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative PET/CT scanner performance characterization based upon the society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging clinical trials network oncology clinical simulator phantom.
Sunderland JJ; Christian PE
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 56(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 25525180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring temporal stability of positron emission tomography standardized uptake value bias using long-lived sources in a multicenter network.
Byrd D; Christopfel R; Arabasz G; Catana C; Karp J; Lodge MA; Laymon C; Moros EG; Budzevich M; Nehmeh S; Scheuermann J; Sunderland J; Zhang J; Kinahan P
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2018 Jan; 5(1):011016. PubMed ID: 29322068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biases in Multicenter Longitudinal PET Standardized Uptake Value Measurements.
Doot RK; Pierce LA; Byrd D; Elston B; Allberg KC; Kinahan PE
Transl Oncol; 2014 Feb; 7(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 24772207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calibration Software for Quantitative PET/CT Imaging Using Pocket Phantoms.
Zukić D; Byrd DW; Kinahan PE; Enquobahrie A
Tomography; 2018 Sep; 4(3):148-158. PubMed ID: 30320214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multicenter study of quantitative PET system harmonization using NIST-traceable
Miwa K; Wagatsuma K; Iimori T; Sawada K; Kamiya T; Sakurai M; Miyaji N; Murata T; Sato E
Phys Med; 2018 Aug; 52():98-103. PubMed ID: 30139617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous Estimation of Bias and Resolution in PET Images With a Long-Lived "Pocket" Phantom System.
Kinahan PE; Byrd DW; Helba B; Wangerin KA; Liu X; Levy JR; Allberg KC; Krishnan K; Avila RS
Tomography; 2018 Mar; 4(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 29984312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The (68)Ge phantom-based FDG-PET site qualification program for clinical trials adopted by FIL (Italian Foundation on Lymphoma).
Chauvie S; Bergesio F; Fioroni F; Brambilla M; Biggi A; Versari A; Guerra L; Storto G; Musto P; Luminari S; Cabras MG; Balzarotti M; Rigacci L; Martelli M; Vitolo U; Federico M; Gallamini A
Phys Med; 2016 May; 32(5):651-6. PubMed ID: 27133138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Underestimation of
Sanderson T; Solomon J; Nottage C; Dickson J
Phys Med; 2019 Mar; 59():158-162. PubMed ID: 30867115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A phantom-based method to standardize dose-calibrators for new β+-emitters.
Morgat C; Mazère J; Fernandez P; Buj S; Vimont D; Schulz J; Lamare F
Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Feb; 36(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 25321161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the absolute quantitative accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography for Cu-64 using traceable calibrated phantoms.
Zimmerman BE; Bergeron DE; Edgerton JP
Appl Radiat Isot; 2018 Apr; 134():68-73. PubMed ID: 28974328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantifying and reducing the effect of calibration error on variability of PET/CT standardized uptake value measurements.
Lockhart CM; MacDonald LR; Alessio AM; McDougald WA; Doot RK; Kinahan PE
J Nucl Med; 2011 Feb; 52(2):218-24. PubMed ID: 21233174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multicenter harmonization of 89Zr PET/CT performance.
Makris NE; Boellaard R; Visser EP; de Jong JR; Vanderlinden B; Wierts R; van der Veen BJ; Greuter HJ; Vugts DJ; van Dongen GA; Lammertsma AA; Huisman MC
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):264-7. PubMed ID: 24357686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicentre quantitative
Huizing DMV; Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Gotthardt M; Boellaard R; Sera T; Sinaasappel M; Stokkel MPM; de Wit-van der Veen BJ
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Nov; 6(1):19. PubMed ID: 31705215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring coronary calcium on CT images adjusted for attenuation differences.
Nelson JC; Kronmal RA; Carr JJ; McNitt-Gray MF; Wong ND; Loria CM; Goldin JG; Williams OD; Detrano R
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):403-14. PubMed ID: 15858082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative assessment of the influence of location, internal temperature, idle time, and normalization on the sensitivity of a mobile PET/CT scanner.
Belakhlef S; Church C; Hays A; Fraser R; Lakhanpal S
J Nucl Med Technol; 2008 Sep; 36(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 18703620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of Dose Calibrators for
Bailey DL; Hofman MS; Forwood NJ; O'Keefe GJ; Scott AM; van Wyngaardt WM; Howe B; Kovacev O; Francis RJ; ;
J Nucl Med; 2018 Apr; 59(4):636-638. PubMed ID: 29326354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity and daily quality control of a mobile PET/CT scanner operating in 3-dimensional mode.
Belakhlef A; Church C; Fraser R; Lakhanpal S
J Nucl Med Technol; 2007 Dec; 35(4):229-31. PubMed ID: 18006593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Volumetry of low-contrast liver lesions with CT: Investigation of estimation uncertainties in a phantom study.
Li Q; Liang Y; Huang Q; Zong M; Berman B; Gavrielides MA; Schwartz LH; Zhao B; Petrick N
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6608. PubMed ID: 27908157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transconvolution and the virtual positron emission tomograph--a new method for cross calibration in quantitative PET∕CT imaging.
Prenosil GA; Weitzel T; Hentschel M; Klaeser B; Krause T
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):062503. PubMed ID: 23718608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
