119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28066807)
21. A virtual sinogram method to reduce dental metallic implant artefacts in computed tomography-based attenuation correction for PET.
Abdoli M; Ay MR; Ahmadian A; Zaidi H
Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Jan; 31(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19829166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Correction for oral contrast artifacts in CT attenuation-corrected PET images obtained by combined PET/CT.
Nehmeh SA; Erdi YE; Kalaigian H; Kolbert KS; Pan T; Yeung H; Squire O; Sinha A; Larson SM; Humm JL
J Nucl Med; 2003 Dec; 44(12):1940-4. PubMed ID: 14660720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multicenter survey of PET/CT protocol parameters that affect standardized uptake values.
Byrd D; Christopfel R; Buatti J; Moros E; Nehmeh S; Opanowski A; Kinahan P
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2018 Jan; 5(1):011012. PubMed ID: 29250567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Integrated PET/MR breast cancer imaging: Attenuation correction and implementation of a 16-channel RF coil.
Oehmigen M; Lindemann ME; Lanz T; Kinner S; Quick HH
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4808. PubMed ID: 27487899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Optimization of a shorter variable-acquisition time for legs to achieve true whole-body PET/CT images.
Umeda T; Miwa K; Murata T; Miyaji N; Wagatsuma K; Motegi K; Terauchi T; Koizumi M
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2017 Dec; 40(4):861-868. PubMed ID: 29098601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Combined PET/MR imaging in neurology: MR-based attenuation correction implies a strong spatial bias when ignoring bone.
Andersen FL; Ladefoged CN; Beyer T; Keller SH; Hansen AE; Højgaard L; Kjær A; Law I; Holm S
Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():206-16. PubMed ID: 23994317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Activity concentration measurements using a conjugate gradient (Siemens xSPECT) reconstruction algorithm in SPECT/CT.
Armstrong IS; Hoffmann SA
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Nov; 37(11):1212-7. PubMed ID: 27501436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.
Williams JM; Rani SD; Li X; Arlinghaus LR; Lee TC; MacDonald LR; Partridge SC; Kang H; Whisenant JG; Abramson RG; Linden HM; Kinahan PE; Yankeelov TE
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3801-13. PubMed ID: 26133582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients.
Burger C; Goerres G; Schoenes S; Buck A; Lonn AH; Von Schulthess GK
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Jul; 29(7):922-7. PubMed ID: 12111133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The impact of image reconstruction bias on PET/CT 90Y dosimetry after radioembolization.
Tapp KN; Lea WB; Johnson MS; Tann M; Fletcher JW; Hutchins GD
J Nucl Med; 2014 Sep; 55(9):1452-8. PubMed ID: 24982437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. On the quantification accuracy, homogeneity, and stability of simultaneous positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging systems.
Schmidt H; Schwenzer NF; Bezrukov I; Mantlik F; Kolb A; Kupferschläger J; Pichler BJ
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jun; 49(6):373-81. PubMed ID: 24368614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of in vivo quantification accuracy of the Ingenuity-TF PET/MR.
Maus J; Schramm G; Hofheinz F; Oehme L; Lougovski A; Petr J; Platzek I; Beuthien-Baumann B; Steinbach J; Kotzerke J; van den Hoff J
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5773-81. PubMed ID: 26429251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of nonionic intravenous contrast agents at PET/CT imaging: phantom and canine studies.
Nakamoto Y; Chin BB; Kraitchman DL; Lawler LP; Marshall LT; Wahl RL
Radiology; 2003 Jun; 227(3):817-24. PubMed ID: 12773683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Calibration of PET/CT scanners for multicenter studies on differentiated thyroid cancer with (124)I.
Kist JW; van der Vlies M; Hoekstra OS; Greuter HN; de Keizer B; Stokkel MP; V Vogel W; Huisman MC; van Lingen A
EJNMMI Res; 2016 Dec; 6(1):39. PubMed ID: 27118538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Metallic artifacts caused by dental metal prostheses on PET images: a PET/CT phantom study using different PET/CT scanners.
Shimamoto H; Kakimoto N; Fujino K; Hamada S; Shimosegawa E; Murakami S; Furukawa S; Hatazawa J
Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Jul; 23(5):443-9. PubMed ID: 19399580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Development of a calibration methodology for large-volume, solid ⁶⁸Ge phantoms for traceable measurements in positron emission tomography.
Zimmerman BE; Pibida L; King LE; Bergeron DE; Cessna JT; Mille MM
Appl Radiat Isot; 2014 May; 87():5-9. PubMed ID: 24332342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The use of zeolites to generate PET phantoms for the validation of quantification strategies in oncology.
Zito F; De Bernardi E; Soffientini C; Canzi C; Casati R; Gerundini P; Baselli G
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5353-61. PubMed ID: 22957603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A DXA Whole Body Composition Cross-Calibration Experience: Evaluation With Humans, Spine, and Whole Body Phantoms.
Krueger D; Libber J; Sanfilippo J; Yu HJ; Horvath B; Miller CG; Binkley N
J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 26071169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Initial experience in small animal tumor imaging with a clinical positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanner using 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.
Tatsumi M; Nakamoto Y; Traughber B; Marshall LT; Geschwind JF; Wahl RL
Cancer Res; 2003 Oct; 63(19):6252-7. PubMed ID: 14559811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Inter-comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT standardized uptake values in Korea.
Park HH; Park DS; Kweon DC; Lee SB; Oh KB; Lee JD; Jin GH
Appl Radiat Isot; 2011 Jan; 69(1):241-6. PubMed ID: 20933430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
