199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28068442)
1. OCT Study of the Femtosecond Laser Opaque Bubble Layer.
Marino GK; Santhiago MR; Wilson SE
J Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 33(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 28068442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Opaque Bubble Layer Risk Factors in Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK.
Courtin R; Saad A; Guilbert E; Grise-Dulac A; Gatinel D
J Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 31(9):608-12. PubMed ID: 26352566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Technique to Reduce Incidence of Opaque Bubble Layer Formation During LASIK Flap Creation Using the VisuMax Femtosecond Laser.
Wu N; Christenbury JG; Dishler JG; Bozkurt TK; Duel D; Zhang L; Hamilton DR
J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):584-590. PubMed ID: 28880332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flap-making patterns and corneal characteristics influence opaque bubble layer occurrence in femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis.
He X; Li SM; Zhai C; Zhang L; Wang Y; Song X; Wang Y
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):300. PubMed ID: 35820852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidence and Risk Factors of Opaque Bubble Layer Formation According to Flap Thickness During 500-kHz FS-LASIK.
Lim DH; Hyun J; Shin E; Ko BW; Chung ES; Chung TY
J Refract Surg; 2019 Sep; 35(9):583-589. PubMed ID: 31498416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Opaque bubble layer incidence in Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: comparison among different flap design parameters.
Mastropasqua L; Calienno R; Lanzini M; Salgari N; De Vecchi S; Mastropasqua R; Nubile M
Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 37(3):635-641. PubMed ID: 27518898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Possible risk factors and clinical effects of an opaque bubble layer created with femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis.
Jung HG; Kim J; Lim TH
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1393-9. PubMed ID: 26210052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influences of Flap Shape and Hinge Angle on Opaque Bubble Layer Formation in Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK Surgery.
Lin HY; Fang YT; Chuang YJ; Yu HC; Pu C; Chou YJ; Chien CY; Lin PJ; Schallhorn SC; Sun CC
J Refract Surg; 2017 Mar; 33(3):178-182. PubMed ID: 28264132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a multifunctional femtosecond laser for the creation of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps.
Slade S; Ignacio T; Spector S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 Mar; 44(3):280-286. PubMed ID: 29703284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Opaque bubble layer: incidence, risk factors, and clinical relevance.
Liu CH; Sun CC; Hui-Kang Ma D; Chien-Chieh Huang J; Liu CF; Chen HF; Hsiao CH
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):435-40. PubMed ID: 24485860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of risk factors for OBL in FS-LASIK and SMILE correction for myopia and myopia astigmatism.
Wang Z; Li M; Ji H; Chen H; Sang A; Cheng X; Li J; Yu Y
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2024 Jun; 262(6):1925-1931. PubMed ID: 38091059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using a 200 kHz femtosecond laser.
Cummings AB; Cummings BK; Kelly GE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Mar; 39(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 23352500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incidence, possible risk factors, and potential effects of an opaque bubble layer created by a femtosecond laser.
Kaiserman I; Maresky HS; Bahar I; Rootman DS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Mar; 34(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 18299066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Possible Risk Factors and Clinical Effects of Opaque Bubble Layer in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).
Son G; Lee J; Jang C; Choi KY; Cho BJ; Lim TH
J Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 33(1):24-29. PubMed ID: 28068443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis flap creation with the three-dimensional, transportable Ziemer FEMTO LDV model Z6 I femtosecond laser.
Pietilä J; Huhtala A; Mäkinen P; Salmenhaara K; Uusitalo H
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 92(7):650-5. PubMed ID: 24373615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective contralateral eye study to compare 80- and 120-μm flap LASIK using the VisuMax femtosecond laser.
Lim DH; Keum JE; Ju WK; Lee JH; Chung TY; Chung ES
J Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 29(7):462-8. PubMed ID: 23820228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Corneal thickness, residual stromal thickness, and its effect on opaque bubble layer in small-incision lenticule extraction.
Ma J; Wang Y; Li L; Zhang J
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 38(5):2013-2020. PubMed ID: 28822026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical penetration of a femtosecond laser-created laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis flap.
Shah SA; Stark WJ
Cornea; 2010 Mar; 29(3):336-8. PubMed ID: 20098318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Refractive Lenticule Transplantation for Correction of Iatrogenic Hyperopia and High Astigmatism After LASIK.
Lazaridis A; Reinstein DZ; Archer TJ; Schulze S; Sekundo W
J Refract Surg; 2016 Nov; 32(11):780-786. PubMed ID: 27824384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of intraoperative subtraction pachymetry and postoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps.
Murakami Y; Manche EE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1879-83. PubMed ID: 21840682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
