100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2806852)
1. [Prognostic significance of cell kinetic parameters of endometrial cancer].
Kühn W; Kaufmann M; Feichter GE; Rummel HH; Abel U; Heep J; von Minckwitz G
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1989 Sep; 49(9):787-92. PubMed ID: 2806852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Flow cytophotometry parameters, hormone receptors and axillary lymph node status as prognostic factors in primary breast cancer].
Kaufmann M; Feichter GE; Nhila A; Klinga K; Abel U
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1988 Oct; 48(10):705-9. PubMed ID: 3234702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic indicators including DNA histogram type, receptor content, and staging related to human breast cancer patient survival.
Coulson PB; Thornthwaite JT; Woolley TW; Sugarbaker EV; Seckinger D
Cancer Res; 1984 Sep; 44(9):4187-96. PubMed ID: 6744328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of tamoxifen on steroid hormone receptors and hormone concentration and the results of DNA analysis by flow cytometry in endometrial carcinoma.
Nola M; Jukić S; Ilić-Forko J; Babić D; Uzarević B; Petrovecki M; Suchanek E; Skrablin S; Dotlić S; Marusić M
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Mar; 72(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 10053103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DNA flow cytometry in uterine endometrial carcinoma.
Jacobsen M; Høyer M; Bentzen SM; Nielsen K
APMIS Suppl; 1991; 23():107-12. PubMed ID: 1883634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic value of DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction in stage I endometrial carcinoma.
Pfisterer J; Kommoss F; Sauerbrei W; Rendl I; Kiechle M; Kleine W; Pfleiderer A
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 58(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 7622098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic significance of morphological parameters and flow cytometric DNA analysis in carcinoma of the breast.
Visscher DW; Zarbo RJ; Greenawald KA; Crissman JD
Pathol Annu; 1990; 25 Pt 1():171-210. PubMed ID: 2153277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flow cytometrical DNA- and clinical parameters in the prediction of prognosis in stage I-II endometrial carcinoma.
Lindahl B; Gullberg B
Anticancer Res; 1991; 11(1):397-401. PubMed ID: 2018376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Association of steroid hormone receptor content and flow cytometric DNA ploidy in endometrial carcinoma.
Grénman SE; Klemi P; Toikkanen S; Irjala K; Laippala P; Vähä-Eskeli K; Mäenpää J; Salmi T
Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1994; 208():10-4. PubMed ID: 8092757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Determination of steroid hormone receptors with the biochemical DCC method in endometrial cancer and tumor margin-endometrium relations to cellular changes and hormone level].
Martin R; Köhler U; Krug H; Rotzsch W
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1993 May; 53(5):314-20. PubMed ID: 8514102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Combined flow cytometry determination of S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy is an independent prognostic factor in node-negative invasive breast carcinoma: review of a series of 271 patients with stage I and II breast cancer].
Moureau-Zabotto L; Bouchet C; Cesari D; Uzan S; Lefranc JP; Antoine M; Genestie C; Deniaud-Alexandre E; Bernaudin JF; Touboul E; Fleury-Feith J
Cancer Radiother; 2005 Dec; 9(8):575-86. PubMed ID: 16243560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flow cytometry in invasive endometrial carcinoma. Correlations between DNA content S-phase rate and clinical parameters.
Stendahl U; Wagenius G; Strang P; Tribukait B
In Vivo; 1988; 2(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 2979827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mutant p53 expression and DNA analysis in human breast cancer comparison with conventional clinicopathological parameters.
Rosanelli GP; Steindorfer P; Wirnsberger GH; Klimpfinger M; Ratschek M; Puerstner P; Auner H; Berhold A
Anticancer Res; 1995; 15(2):581-6. PubMed ID: 7763041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multivariate analysis of the prognostic significance of DNA-ploidy and S-phase fraction in ovarian cancer determined by flow cytometry following detection of cytokeratin-labeled tumor cells.
Kimmig R; Wimberger P; Hillemanns P; Kapsner T; Caspari C; Hepp H
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Jan; 84(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 11748971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA ploidy, proliferation index, grade, and stage as prognostic factors for vulvar squamous cell carcinomas.
Dolan JR; McCall AR; Gooneratne S; Walter S; Lansky DM
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Feb; 48(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 8428696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of cirrhotic liver cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma can provide a new prognostic factor.
Ruà S; Comino A; Fruttero A; Torchio P; Bouzari H; Taraglio S; Torchio B; Capussotti L
Cancer; 1996 Sep; 78(6):1195-202. PubMed ID: 8826940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flow cytometry and interactive image cytometry in endometrial carcinoma. A comparative and prognostic study.
Strang P; Stenkvist B; Bergström R; Stendahl U; Valdes del Campo M; Tribukait B
Anticancer Res; 1991; 11(2):783-8. PubMed ID: 2064334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective multicenter validation confirms the prognostic superiority of the endometrial carcinoma prognostic index in international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage 1 and 2 endometrial carcinoma.
Baak JP; Snijders W; van Diermen B; van Diest PJ; Diepenhorst FW; Benraadt J
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Nov; 21(22):4214-21. PubMed ID: 14615450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of normal and cancerous human endometrium and cytological-histopathological correlations.
Lindahl B; Alm P; Killander D; Långström E; Tropé C
Anticancer Res; 1987; 7(4B):781-9. PubMed ID: 3674763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic significance of DNA content in bladder cancer based on flow cytometric analysis of 249 transitional cell carcinomas.
Vindeløv LL; Christensen IJ; Engelholm SA; Guldhammer BH; Højgaard K; Sørensen BL; Wolf H
Cytometry; 1995 Jun; 22(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 7587754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
