335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28068770)
1. Comparison of Explicitly Correlated Methods for Computing High-Accuracy Benchmark Energies for Noncovalent Interactions.
Sirianni DA; Burns LA; Sherrill CD
J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jan; 13(1):86-99. PubMed ID: 28068770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extrapolating MP2 and CCSD explicitly correlated correlation energies to the complete basis set limit with first and second row correlation consistent basis sets.
Hill JG; Peterson KA; Knizia G; Werner HJ
J Chem Phys; 2009 Nov; 131(19):194105. PubMed ID: 19929044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the accuracy of explicitly correlated coupled-cluster interaction energies--have orbital results been beaten yet?
Patkowski K
J Chem Phys; 2012 Jul; 137(3):034103. PubMed ID: 22830679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toward a W4-F12 approach: Can explicitly correlated and orbital-based ab initio CCSD(T) limits be reconciled?
Sylvetsky N; Peterson KA; Karton A; Martin JM
J Chem Phys; 2016 Jun; 144(21):214101. PubMed ID: 27276939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving "Silver-Standard" Benchmark Interaction Energies with Bond Functions.
Dutta NN; Patkowski K
J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Jun; 14(6):3053-3070. PubMed ID: 29772176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of Reaction Barriers and Thermochemical Properties with Explicitly Correlated Coupled-Cluster Methods: A Basis Set Assessment.
Zhang J; Valeev EF
J Chem Theory Comput; 2012 Sep; 8(9):3175-86. PubMed ID: 26605729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calibration study of the CCSD(T)-F12a/b methods for C2 and small hydrocarbons.
Feller D; Peterson KA; Hill JG
J Chem Phys; 2010 Nov; 133(18):184102. PubMed ID: 21073208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An expanded calibration study of the explicitly correlated CCSD(T)-F12b method using large basis set standard CCSD(T) atomization energies.
Feller D; Peterson KA
J Chem Phys; 2013 Aug; 139(8):084110. PubMed ID: 24006977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benchmark theoretical study of the π-π binding energy in the benzene dimer.
Miliordos E; Aprà E; Xantheas SS
J Phys Chem A; 2014 Sep; 118(35):7568-78. PubMed ID: 24761749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation consistent basis sets for explicitly correlated wavefunctions: pseudopotential-based basis sets for the post-d main group elements Ga-Rn.
Hill JG; Peterson KA
J Chem Phys; 2014 Sep; 141(9):094106. PubMed ID: 25194363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Post-complete-basis-set extrapolation of conventional and explicitly correlated coupled-cluster energies: can the convergence to the CBS limit be diagnosed?
Varandas AJC
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2021 Apr; 23(14):8717-8730. PubMed ID: 33876031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical Electronic Structure Calibration Study of the CCSD(T*)-F12b Method for Atomization Energies.
Feller D
J Phys Chem A; 2015 Jul; 119(28):7375-87. PubMed ID: 25730633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Explicit correlation and basis set superposition error: the structure and energy of carbon dioxide dimer.
McMahon JD; Lane JR
J Chem Phys; 2011 Oct; 135(15):154309. PubMed ID: 22029315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Basis set convergence of CCSD(T) equilibrium geometries using a large and diverse set of molecular structures.
Spackman PR; Jayatilaka D; Karton A
J Chem Phys; 2016 Sep; 145(10):104101. PubMed ID: 27634245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Calculations on noncovalent interactions and databases of benchmark interaction energies.
Hobza P
Acc Chem Res; 2012 Apr; 45(4):663-72. PubMed ID: 22225511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Basis set convergence of the coupled-cluster correction, δ(MP2)(CCSD(T)): best practices for benchmarking non-covalent interactions and the attendant revision of the S22, NBC10, HBC6, and HSG databases.
Marshall MS; Burns LA; Sherrill CD
J Chem Phys; 2011 Nov; 135(19):194102. PubMed ID: 22112061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficient and automated computation of accurate molecular geometries using focal-point approximations to large-basis coupled-cluster theory.
Warden CE; Smith DGA; Burns LA; Bozkaya U; Sherrill CD
J Chem Phys; 2020 Mar; 152(12):124109. PubMed ID: 32241148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Explicit correlation and intermolecular interactions: investigating carbon dioxide complexes with the CCSD(T)-F12 method.
de Lange KM; Lane JR
J Chem Phys; 2011 Jan; 134(3):034301. PubMed ID: 21261347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revisiting the Atomic Natural Orbital Approach for Basis Sets: Robust Systematic Basis Sets for Explicitly Correlated and Conventional Correlated ab initio Methods?
Neese F; Valeev EF
J Chem Theory Comput; 2011 Jan; 7(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 26606216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the accuracy of explicitly correlated methods to generate potential energy surfaces for scattering calculations and clustering: application to the HCl-He complex.
Ajili Y; Hammami K; Jaidane NE; Lanza M; Kalugina YN; Lique F; Hochlaf M
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2013 Jul; 15(25):10062-70. PubMed ID: 23443908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
