BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

539 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28068826)

  • 1. CT, MRI, and
    Kim HY; Hwang JY; Kim HJ; Kim YK; Cha J; Park GM; Kim ST
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Oct; 58(10):1222-1230. PubMed ID: 28068826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of (18)F-FDG PET and MRI in differentiating benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.
    Broski SM; Johnson GB; Howe BM; Nathan MA; Wenger DE; Spinner RJ; Amrami KK
    Skeletal Radiol; 2016 Aug; 45(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 27115884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT in the differentiation of incidental tracer uptake in the head and neck area?
    Schaarschmidt BM; Gomez B; Buchbender C; Grueneisen J; Nensa F; Sawicki LM; Ruhlmann V; Wetter A; Antoch G; Heusch P
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2017; 23(2):127-132. PubMed ID: 28089955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET/CT versus whole-body MRI for detection of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in neurofibromatosis type 1.
    Derlin T; Tornquist K; Münster S; Apostolova I; Hagel C; Friedrich RE; Wedegärtner U; Mautner VF
    Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Jan; 38(1):e19-25. PubMed ID: 23242059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT scan and 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy in detecting bone metastasis in head and neck tumors.
    Al-Bulushi NK; Abouzied ME
    Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Jun; 37(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 26813992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of loco-regional recurrence in malignant head and neck tumors: a comparison of CT, MRI, and FDG PET-CT.
    Kim ES; Yoon DY; Moon JY; Baek S; Han YM; Seo YL; Yun EJ
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Feb; 60(2):186-195. PubMed ID: 29754496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Atypical
    Childs L; Thompson A; Jones H; Hameeduddin A; Ghufoor K; Adams A
    Clin Imaging; 2018; 49():136-143. PubMed ID: 29414508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic evaluation of malignant head and neck cancer by F-18-FDG PET compared to CT/MRI.
    Nowak B; Di Martino E; Jänicke S; Cremerius U; Adam G; Zimny M; Reinartz P; Büll U
    Nuklearmedizin; 1999; 38(8):312-8. PubMed ID: 10615664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 18F-FDG PET/CT qualitative and quantitative evaluation in neurofibromatosis type 1 patients for detection of malignant transformation: comparison of early to delayed imaging with and without liver activity normalization.
    Chirindel A; Chaudhry M; Blakeley JO; Wahl R
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Mar; 56(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 25655626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose for suspected head and neck tumor recurrence in the symptomatic patient.
    Lonneux M; Lawson G; Ide C; Bausart R; Remacle M; Pauwels S
    Laryngoscope; 2000 Sep; 110(9):1493-7. PubMed ID: 10983949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (MRI, CT, and 67Ga scintigraphy) in assessment of combined intraarterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma.
    Kitagawa Y; Nishizawa S; Sano K; Ogasawara T; Nakamura M; Sadato N; Yoshida M; Yonekura Y
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 12571209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positron emission computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging features of sinonasal small round blue cell tumors.
    Ozturk K; Gencturk M; Caicedo-Granados E; Li F; Cayci Z
    Neuroradiol J; 2020 Feb; 33(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 31460836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    Abadi P; Johansen A; Godballe C; Gerke O; Høilund-Carlsen PF; Thomassen A
    Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Feb; 31(2):101-108. PubMed ID: 27921286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical significance of FDG single-photon emission computed tomography: Computed tomography in the diagnosis of head and neck cancers and study of its mechanism.
    Li LF; Zhou SH; Zhao K; Wang SQ; Wu QL; Fan J; Cheng KJ; Ling L
    Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2008 Dec; 23(6):701-14. PubMed ID: 19317609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast-enhanced PET/MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced PET/CT in head and neck cancer: how much MR information is needed?
    Kuhn FP; Hüllner M; Mader CE; Kastrinidis N; Huber GF; von Schulthess GK; Kollias S; Veit-Haibach P
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Apr; 55(4):551-8. PubMed ID: 24491410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. FDG PET/CT and MRI Features of Pathologically Proven Schwannomas.
    Dewey BJ; Howe BM; Spinner RJ; Johnson GB; Nathan MA; Wenger DE; Broski SM
    Clin Nucl Med; 2021 Apr; 46(4):289-296. PubMed ID: 33443952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) as a diagnostic tool for neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs): a long-term clinical study.
    Ferner RE; Golding JF; Smith M; Calonje E; Jan W; Sanjayanathan V; O'Doherty M
    Ann Oncol; 2008 Feb; 19(2):390-4. PubMed ID: 17932395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of combination of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography for evaluation of ovarian masses.
    Tsuboyama T; Tatsumi M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Sakane M; Hori Y; Morii E; Hatazawa J; Tomiyama N
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):524-31. PubMed ID: 24637584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 18F fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with negative neck palpation findings: a prospective study.
    Roh JL; Park JP; Kim JS; Lee JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
    Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 24475791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post-treatment surveillance of head and neck cancer: pitfalls in the interpretation of FDG PET-CT/MRI.
    Meerwein CM; Queiroz M; Kollias S; Hüllner M; Veit-Haibach P; Huber GF
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2015; 145():w14116. PubMed ID: 25701645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.