BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28069159)

  • 21. PCA3-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer and high grade cancer on initial transrectal guided biopsy.
    Elshafei A; Chevli KK; Moussa AS; Kara O; Chueh SC; Walter P; Hatem A; Gao T; Jones JS; Duff M
    Prostate; 2015 Dec; 75(16):1951-7. PubMed ID: 26384170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Population net benefit of prostate MRI with high spatiotemporal resolution contrast-enhanced imaging: A decision curve analysis.
    Prabhu V; Rosenkrantz AB; Otazo R; Sodickson DK; Kang SK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 May; 49(5):1400-1408. PubMed ID: 30629317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A novel nomogram to predict clinically significant prostate cancer in MR assisted lesion biopsies: Turkish urooncology association nomogram.
    Şahin B; Çetin S; Sözen S; Aslan G; Çelik S; Türkeri L
    Urol Oncol; 2024 Sep; 42(9):288.e17-288.e25. PubMed ID: 38782675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A nomogram based on PI-RADS v2.1 and clinical indicators for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in the transition zone.
    Wei C; Pan P; Chen T; Zhang Y; Dai G; Tu J; Jiang Z; Zhao W; Shen J
    Transl Androl Urol; 2021 Jun; 10(6):2435-2446. PubMed ID: 34295730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study.
    Thompson JE; Moses D; Shnier R; Brenner P; Delprado W; Ponsky L; Pulbrook M; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Hayen A; Stricker PD
    J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 24518762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Performing Precise Biopsy in Naive Patients With Equivocal PI-RADS, Version 2, Score 3, Lesions: An MRI-based Nomogram to Avoid Unnecessary Surgical Intervention.
    Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang FB; Rui Huang YX; Tian Y
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Oct; 18(5):367-377. PubMed ID: 32771334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A nomogram for predicting low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer: a tool in selecting patients for active surveillance.
    Nakanishi H; Wang X; Ochiai A; Trpkov K; Yilmaz A; Donnelly JB; Davis JW; Troncoso P; Babaian RJ
    Cancer; 2007 Dec; 110(11):2441-7. PubMed ID: 17932909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biparametric prostate MRI and clinical indicators predict clinically significant prostate cancer in men with "gray zone" PSA levels.
    Wei CG; Chen T; Zhang YY; Pan P; Dai GC; Yu HC; Yang S; Jiang Z; Tu J; Lu ZH; Shen JK; Zhao WL
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 127():108977. PubMed ID: 32330776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development and internal validation of PI-RADs v2-based model for clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhu YC; Huang YXR; Guo Q; Tian Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 16(1):102. PubMed ID: 29859119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Prospective validation of a nomogram predictive of a positive initial prostate biopsy].
    Ramírez-Backhaus M; Bahilo P; Arlandis S; Santamaría Navarro C; Pontones Moreno JL; Jiménez-Cruz F
    Actas Urol Esp; 2010 Jan; 34(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 20223131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Exploration of the diagnostic capacity of PSAMR combined with PI-RADS scoring for clinically significant prostate cancer and establishment and validation of the Nomogram prediction model.
    Li D; Zhang L; Xu Y; Wu X; Hua S; Jiang Y; Huang Q; Gao Y
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 Oct; 149(13):11309-11317. PubMed ID: 37365430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimizing the clinical utility of PCA3 to diagnose prostate cancer in initial prostate biopsy.
    Rubio-Briones J; Borque A; Esteban LM; Casanova J; Fernandez-Serra A; Rubio L; Casanova-Salas I; Sanz G; Domínguez-Escrig J; Collado A; Gómez-Ferrer A; Iborra I; Ramírez-Backhaus M; Martínez F; Calatrava A; Lopez-Guerrero JA
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Sep; 15():633. PubMed ID: 26362197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The utility of PSA velocity in prediction of prostate cancer and high grade cancer after an initially negative prostate biopsy.
    Elshafei A; Li YH; Hatem A; Moussa AS; Ethan V; Krishnan N; Li J; Jones JS
    Prostate; 2013 Dec; 73(16):1796-802. PubMed ID: 24038200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nomogram using transrectal ultrasound-derived information predicting the detection of high grade prostate cancer on initial biopsy.
    Jeong IG; Lim JH; Hwang SS; Kim SC; You D; Hong JH; Ahn H; Kim CS
    Prostate Int; 2013; 1(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 24223405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Using an MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.
    Kim SH; Choi MS; Kim MJ; Kim YH; Cho SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):800-805. PubMed ID: 28705064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2.
    Feng ZY; Wang L; Min XD; Wang SG; Wang GP; Cai J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Oct; 129(20):2451-2459. PubMed ID: 27748338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development and External Validation of Multiparametric MRI-Derived Nomogram to Predict Risk of Pathologic Upgrade in Patients on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
    Kim SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):825-834. PubMed ID: 31913073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prostate volume predicts high grade prostate cancer both in digital rectal examination negative (ct1c) and positive (≥ct2) patients.
    Yilmaz H; Ustuner M; Ciftci S; Yavuz U; Ozkan TA; Dillioglugil O
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(5):613-9. PubMed ID: 25498272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Performance of PI-RADS version 1 versus version 2 regarding the relation with histopathological results.
    Auer T; Edlinger M; Bektic J; Nagele U; Herrmann T; Schäfer G; Aigner F; Junker D
    World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):687-693. PubMed ID: 27510762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of Clinical History on Maximum PI-RADS Version 2 Score: A Six-Reader 120-Case Sham History Retrospective Evaluation.
    Shankar PR; Kaza RK; Al-Hawary MM; Masch WR; Curci NE; Mendiratta-Lala M; Sakala MD; Johnson TD; Davenport MS
    Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):158-163. PubMed ID: 29664338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.