305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28070668)
1. What happens to asymptomatic lower pole kidney stones smaller than 10 mm in children during watchful waiting?
Telli O; Hamidi N; Bagci U; Demirbas A; Hascicek AM; Soygur T; Burgu B
Pediatr Nephrol; 2017 May; 32(5):853-857. PubMed ID: 28070668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of long-term follow-up of patients with conservative management of asymptomatic renal calculi.
Koh LT; Ng FC; Ng KK
BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(4):622-5. PubMed ID: 21851532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Renal stone composition does not affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children.
Kaygısız O; Türegün FA; Satar N; Özen E; Toksöz S; Doğan HS; Pişkin MM; İzol V; Sarıkaya Ş; Kılıçarslan H; Çiçek T; Öztürk A; Tekgül S; Önal B
World J Urol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1863-1869. PubMed ID: 29761226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical interventions for stones in the lower pole of the kidney: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones randomised controlled trial (PUrE RCT) protocol.
McClinton S; Starr K; Thomas R; MacLennan G; Lam T; Hernandez R; Pickard R; Anson K; Clark T; MacLennan S; Thomas D; Smith D; Turney B; McDonald A; Cameron S; Wiseman O
Trials; 2020 Jun; 21(1):479. PubMed ID: 32498699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Asymptomatic lower pole small renal stones: shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopy, or observation? A prospective randomized trial.
Sener NC; Bas O; Sener E; Zengin K; Ozturk U; Altunkol A; Evliyaoglu Y
Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 25440816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcome Analysis of Asymptomatic Lower Pole Stones in Children.
Dos Santos J; Lopes RI; Veloso AO; Harvey E; Farhat WA; Papanikolaou F
J Urol; 2016 Apr; 195(4 Pt 2):1289-93. PubMed ID: 26926554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children with cystine stone: long-term outcomes from a single institution.
Onal B; Dogan C; Citgez S; Argun B; Onder AU; Sever L; Caliskan S; Canpolat N; Tasdemir M; Erozenci A
J Urol; 2013 Jul; 190(1):234-7. PubMed ID: 23313363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The natural history of asymptomatic calyceal stones.
Darrad MP; Yallappa S; Metcalfe J; Subramonian K
BJU Int; 2018 Aug; 122(2):263-269. PubMed ID: 29675983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment of renal stones in children: a comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shock wave lithotripsy.
Shokeir AA; Sheir KZ; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; Eassa W; El-Kappany HA
J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):706-10. PubMed ID: 16813924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of the results of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for solitary upper urinary tract stone].
Wada S; Kishimoto T; Ameno Y; Ohyama A; Kamizuru M; Iimori H; Kanazawa T; Asakawa M; Yoshihara H; Sakamoto W
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1990 Oct; 36(10):1137-40. PubMed ID: 2264541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring.
Desai M; Sun Y; Buchholz N; Fuller A; Matsuda T; Matlaga B; Miller N; Bolton D; Alomar M; Ganpule A
World J Urol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 28303335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of long-term follow-up of asymptomatic renal stones and prediction of stone-related events.
Li X; Zhu W; Lam W; Yue Y; Duan H; Zeng G
BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):485-492. PubMed ID: 30253029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is lower pole caliceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones?
Sorensen CM; Chandhoke PS
J Urol; 2002 Dec; 168(6):2377-82; discussion 2382. PubMed ID: 12441921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stone-Free-Rate After Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in the Management of Pediatric Renal Stones in Lower Pole and Other Locations - A Comparative Study.
Iqbal N; Muhammad S; Zafar W; Tashfeen R; Faiz J; Hasan A; Hussain I; Akhter S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Nov; 26(11):908-911. PubMed ID: 27981926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective, randomized trial of management for asymptomatic lower pole calculi.
Yuruk E; Binbay M; Sari E; Akman T; Altinyay E; Baykal M; Muslumanoglu AY; Tefekli A
J Urol; 2010 Apr; 183(4):1424-8. PubMed ID: 20172565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do JJ Stents Increase the Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Pediatric Renal Stones?
Gündüz M; Sekmenli T; Ciftci İ; Elmacı AM
Urol Int; 2017; 98(4):425-428. PubMed ID: 27780167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones.
Onal B; Demirkesen O; Tansu N; Kalkan M; Altintaş R; Yalçin V
J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 15311043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
