These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28070683)

  • 1. Do we have the right PROMs for measuring outcomes in lumbar spinal surgery?
    Stokes OM; Cole AA; Breakwell LM; Lloyd AJ; Leonard CM; Grevitt M
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Mar; 26(3):816-824. PubMed ID: 28070683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Grotle M; Solberg T; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Storheim K; Hellum C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 30658613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter observational study based on data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Werner DAT; Grotle M; Gulati S; Austevoll IM; Lønne G; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2650-2659. PubMed ID: 28616747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Should the EuroQol-Five Dimensions Replace the Oswestry Disability Index When Tracking Lumbar Tubular Microdecompression Outcomes?
    Knio ZO; VanHorn TA; O'Gara TJ
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():e566-e571. PubMed ID: 31678442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Follow-up of degenerative lumbar spine surgery-PROMs stabilize after 1 year: an equivalence study based on Swespine data.
    Parai C; Hägg O; Lind B; Brisby H
    Eur Spine J; 2019 Sep; 28(9):2187-2197. PubMed ID: 31041598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index interchangeable in patients after lumbar spinal fusion?
    Kersten RFMR; Fikkers J; Wolterbeek N; Öner FC; van Gaalen SM
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2021; 34(4):605-611. PubMed ID: 33646141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
    McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of lumbar surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Glassman SD; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):2885-91. PubMed ID: 24768731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patients' Preference of the Timed Up and Go Test or Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Before and After Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease.
    Joswig H; Stienen MN; Smoll NR; Corniola MV; Chau I; Schaller K; Hildebrandt G; Gautschi OP
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Mar; 99():26-30. PubMed ID: 27913260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the mental health status on a new measure of objective functional impairment in lumbar degenerative disc disease.
    Stienen MN; Smoll NR; Joswig H; Snagowski J; Corniola MV; Schaller K; Hildebrandt G; Gautschi OP
    Spine J; 2017 Jun; 17(6):807-813. PubMed ID: 27988343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The association between the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey and real-world clinical outcomes in lumbar spine surgery.
    Levin JM; Winkelman RD; Smith GA; Tanenbaum J; Benzel EC; Mroz TE; Steinmetz MP
    Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1586-1593. PubMed ID: 28495242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.
    DeVine J; Norvell DC; Ecker E; Fourney DR; Vaccaro A; Wang J; Andersson G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S69-74. PubMed ID: 21897347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in appropriateness criteria of surgery for degenerative lumbar scoliosis.
    Jacobs E; van Kuijk SMJ; Merk JMR; Vandewall-Peeters M; Jütten-Brouwer LMC; van Rhijn LW; Willems PC
    Spine J; 2019 Apr; 19(4):655-661. PubMed ID: 30261263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of Gender Disparities on Short-Term and Long-Term Patient Reported Outcomes and Satisfaction Measures After Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Single Institutional Study of 384 Patients.
    Elsamadicy AA; Reddy GB; Nayar G; Sergesketter A; Zakare-Fagbamila R; Karikari IO; Gottfried ON
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Nov; 107():952-958. PubMed ID: 28743671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient-reported outcomes 3 months after spine surgery: is it an accurate predictor of 12-month outcome in real-world registry platforms?
    Parker SL; Asher AL; Godil SS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E17. PubMed ID: 26621415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can the anxiety domain of EQ-5D and mental health items from SF-36 help predict outcomes after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders?
    Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Owens RK; Crawford CH; Puno RM; Bratcher KR; McGraw KE; Glassman SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Sep; 25(3):352-6. PubMed ID: 27153141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Devin CJ; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 23685216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.