180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28070869)
1. Fast T1 and T2 mapping methods: the zoomed U-FLARE sequence compared with EPI and snapshot-FLASH for abdominal imaging at 11.7 Tesla.
Pastor G; Jiménez-González M; Plaza-García S; Beraza M; Reese T
MAGMA; 2017 Jun; 30(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 28070869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diffusion-sensitized ophthalmic magnetic resonance imaging free of geometric distortion at 3.0 and 7.0 T: a feasibility study in healthy subjects and patients with intraocular masses.
Paul K; Graessl A; Rieger J; Lysiak D; Huelnhagen T; Winter L; Heidemann R; Lindner T; Hadlich S; Zimpfer A; Pohlmann A; Endemann B; Krüger PC; Langner S; Stachs O; Niendorf T
Invest Radiol; 2015 May; 50(5):309-21. PubMed ID: 25612144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Small Field-of-view single-shot EPI-DWI of the prostate: Evaluation of spatially-tailored two-dimensional radiofrequency excitation pulses.
Attenberger UI; Rathmann N; Sertdemir M; Riffel P; Weidner A; Kannengiesser S; Morelli JN; Schoenberg SO; Hausmann D
Z Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 26(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 26300045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney: comparison with single-shot echo-planar imaging in image quality.
Wu CJ; Wang Q; Zhang J; Wang XN; Liu XS; Zhang YD; Shi HB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jan; 41(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 26830616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interleaved snapshot echo planar imaging of mouse brain at 7.0 T.
Guilfoyle DN; Hrabe J
NMR Biomed; 2006 Feb; 19(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 16411168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo high angular resolution diffusion-weighted imaging of mouse brain at 16.4 Tesla.
Alomair OI; Brereton IM; Smith MT; Galloway GJ; Kurniawan ND
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130133. PubMed ID: 26110770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SNR efficiency of combined bipolar gradient echoes: Comparison of three-dimensional FLASH, MPRAGE, and multiparameter mapping with VFA-FLASH and MP2RAGE.
Jutras JD; Wachowicz K; Gilbert G; De Zanche N
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jun; 77(6):2186-2202. PubMed ID: 27416792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute brain ischemia at 3 T: current possibilities and future perspectives comparing conventional echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging and fast spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging sequences using BLADE (PROPELLER).
Fries P; Runge VM; Kirchin MA; Stemmer A; Naul LG; Wiliams KD; Reith W; Bücker A; Schneider G
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jun; 44(6):351-9. PubMed ID: 19363447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of ferucarbotran-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery echo-planar, T2-weighted turbo spin-echo, T2*-weighted gradient-echo, and diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging for detection of malignant liver lesions.
Fukukura Y; Kamiyama T; Takumi K; Shindo T; Higashi R; Nakajo M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Mar; 31(3):607-16. PubMed ID: 20187203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fast measurement of the quadriceps femoris muscle transverse relaxation time at high magnetic field using segmented echo-planar imaging.
Fouré A; Duhamel G; Vilmen C; Bendahan D; Jubeau M; Gondin J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 45(2):356-368. PubMed ID: 27381383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A body-sized phantom for evaluation of diffusion-weighted MRI data using conventional, readout-segmented, and zoomed echo-planar sequences.
Ihalainen T; Kuusela L; Soikkeli M; Lantto E; Ovissi A; Sipilä O
Acta Radiol; 2016 Aug; 57(8):947-54. PubMed ID: 26543056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the appendicular skeleton with a non-Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill single-shot fast spin-echo sequence.
Oner AY; Aggunlu L; Akpek S; Tali T; Celik A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1494-501. PubMed ID: 18029891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PROPELLER EPI: an MRI technique suitable for diffusion tensor imaging at high field strength with reduced geometric distortions.
Wang FN; Huang TY; Lin FH; Chuang TC; Chen NK; Chung HW; Chen CY; Kwong KK
Magn Reson Med; 2005 Nov; 54(5):1232-40. PubMed ID: 16206142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of echo spacing and readout bandwidth on basic performances of EPI-fMRI acquisition sequences implemented on two 1.5 T MR scanner systems.
Giannelli M; Diciotti S; Tessa C; Mascalchi M
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):303-10. PubMed ID: 20175493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D interslab echo-shifted FLASH sequence for susceptibility weighted imaging.
Ma YJ; Liu W; Zhao X; Tang W; Li H; Fan Y; Tang X; Zhang Y; Gao JH
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Jul; 76(1):222-8. PubMed ID: 26302037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Calculation of T2 relaxation time from ultrafast single shot sequences for differentiation of liver tumors: comparison of echo-planar, HASTE, and spin-echo sequences.
Abe Y; Yamashita Y; Tang Y; Namimoto T; Takahashi M
Radiat Med; 2000; 18(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 10852650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the signal-to-noise ratio efficiency and slab-banding artifacts in three-dimensional multislab diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging.
Engström M; Mårtensson M; Avventi E; Skare S
Magn Reson Med; 2015 Feb; 73(2):718-25. PubMed ID: 24647997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio?
Schindera ST; Merkle EM; Dale BM; Delong DM; Nelson RC
Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1236-43. PubMed ID: 16979073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in the evaluation of sinonasal lesions: A comprehensive comparison of image quality in single-shot echo-planar imaging.
Zhao M; Liu Z; Sha Y; Wang S; Ye X; Pan Y; Wang S
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 34(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 26541548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Abdominal and pelvic segmented T1-weighted echo-planar imaging and MRI. Comparison with T1-TSE and T2-UTSE sequences].
Maubon A; Berger V; Aubas P; Ferru JM; Rouanet JP
J Radiol; 1999 Mar; 80(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 10327336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
