BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

572 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28071796)

  • 1. Influence of Package Visual Cues of Sweeteners on the Sensory-Emotional Profiles of Their Products.
    Wardy W; Chonpracha P; Chokumnoyporn N; Sriwattana S; Prinyawiwatkul W; Jirangrat W
    J Food Sci; 2017 Feb; 82(2):500-508. PubMed ID: 28071796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) comparison of taste profiles for different sweeteners in black tea, chocolate milk, and natural yogurt.
    Tan VWK; Wee MSM; Tomic O; Forde CG
    J Food Sci; 2020 Feb; 85(2):486-492. PubMed ID: 31968393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensory profile and acceptability for pitanga (Eugenia uniflora L.) nectar with different sweeteners.
    Freitas ML; Dutra MB; Bolini HM
    Food Sci Technol Int; 2016 Dec; 22(8):720-731. PubMed ID: 27118767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensory Profile, Drivers of Liking, and Influence of Information on the Acceptance of Low-Calorie Synbiotic and Probiotic Chocolate Ice Cream.
    Peres J; Esmerino E; da Silva AL; Racowski I; Bolini H
    J Food Sci; 2018 May; 83(5):1350-1359. PubMed ID: 29660810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of Natural and Artificial Sweeteners Compounds in the Sensory Profile and Preference Drivers Applied to Traditional, Lactose-Free, and Vegan Frozen Desserts of Chocolate Flavor.
    de Medeiros AC; Filho ERT; Bolini HMA
    J Food Sci; 2019 Oct; 84(10):2973-2982. PubMed ID: 31546291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized controlled trial contrasting the effects of 4 low-calorie sweeteners and sucrose on body weight in adults with overweight or obesity.
    Higgins KA; Mattes RD
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2019 May; 109(5):1288-1301. PubMed ID: 30997499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensory Influence of Sweetener Addition on Traditional and Decaffeinated Espresso.
    Cusielo KVC; da Silva ACML; Tavares-Filho ER; Bolini HMA
    J Food Sci; 2019 Sep; 84(9):2628-2637. PubMed ID: 31441950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal sweetness and side tastes profiles of 16 sweeteners using temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA).
    Tan VWK; Wee MSM; Tomic O; Forde CG
    Food Res Int; 2019 Jul; 121():39-47. PubMed ID: 31108762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chocolate Milk with Chia Oil: Ideal Sweetness, Sweeteners Equivalence, and Dynamic Sensory Evaluation Using a Time-Intensity Methodology.
    Rodrigues JB; Paixão JA; Cruz AG; Bolini HM
    J Food Sci; 2015 Dec; 80(12):S2944-9. PubMed ID: 26523944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium.
    Dess NK; Dobson K; Roberts BT; Chapman CD
    Chem Senses; 2017 Jun; 42(5):381-392. PubMed ID: 28334357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensory characteristics and relative sweetness of tagatose and other sweeteners.
    Fujimaru T; Park JH; Lim J
    J Food Sci; 2012 Sep; 77(9):S323-8. PubMed ID: 22908895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parents' and children's acceptance of skim chocolate milks sweetened by monk fruit and stevia leaf extracts.
    Li XE; Lopetcharat K; Drake MA
    J Food Sci; 2015 May; 80(5):S1083-92. PubMed ID: 25847181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of two low-calorie sweeteners and sugar in dark chocolate on sensory attributes and emotional conceptualisations.
    Lagast S; De Steur H; Schouteten JJ; Gellynck X
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2018 May; 69(3):344-357. PubMed ID: 28805091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparison of Psychophysical Dose-Response Behaviour across 16 Sweeteners.
    Wee M; Tan V; Forde C
    Nutrients; 2018 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 30400167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of the relative sweetness of stevia extract, aspartame and cyclamate/saccharin blend as compared to sucrose at different concentrations.
    Cardello HM; Da Silva MA; Damasio MH
    Plant Foods Hum Nutr; 1999; 54(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 10646559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sweeteners: consumer acceptance in tea.
    Sprowl DJ; Ehrcke LA
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1984 Sep; 84(9):1020-2. PubMed ID: 6470371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of just-about-right scales and penalty analysis to determine appropriate concentrations of stevia sweeteners for vanilla yogurt.
    Narayanan P; Chinnasamy B; Jin L; Clark S
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3262-72. PubMed ID: 24679934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stevia and saccharin preferences in rats and mice.
    Sclafani A; Bahrani M; Zukerman S; Ackroff K
    Chem Senses; 2010 Jun; 35(5):433-43. PubMed ID: 20413452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biological fate of low-calorie sweeteners.
    Magnuson BA; Carakostas MC; Moore NH; Poulos SP; Renwick AG
    Nutr Rev; 2016 Nov; 74(11):670-689. PubMed ID: 27753624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing Consumer Emotional Responses in the Presence and Absence of Critical Quality Attributes: A Case Study with Chicken Eggs.
    Wardy W; Sae-Eaw A; Sriwattana S; No HK; Prinyawiwatkul W
    J Food Sci; 2015 Jul; 80(7):S1574-82. PubMed ID: 26174189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.