These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28071797)

  • 21. Consumer Sensory Comparisons Among Beef, Horse, Elk, and Bison Using Preferred Attributes Elicitation and Check-All-That-Apply Methods.
    Popoola IO; Bruce HL; McMullen LM; Wismer WV
    J Food Sci; 2019 Oct; 84(10):3009-3017. PubMed ID: 31509247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Do all the consumers accept marbling in the same way? The relationship between eating and visual acceptability of pork with different intramuscular fat content.
    Font-i-Furnols M; Tous N; Esteve-Garcia E; Gispert M
    Meat Sci; 2012 Aug; 91(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 22429803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of technology information on consumer expectations and liking of beef.
    Van Wezemael L; Ueland Ø; Rødbotten R; De Smet S; Scholderer J; Verbeke W
    Meat Sci; 2012 Feb; 90(2):444-50. PubMed ID: 21981934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spanish, French and British consumers' acceptability of Uruguayan beef, and consumers' beef choice associated with country of origin, finishing diet and meat price.
    Realini CE; Font i Furnols M; Sañudo C; Montossi F; Oliver MA; Guerrero L
    Meat Sci; 2013 Sep; 95(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 23644048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intensive vs. free-range organic beef. A preference study through consumer liking and conjoint analysis.
    García-Torres S; López-Gajardo A; Mesías FJ
    Meat Sci; 2016 Apr; 114():114-120. PubMed ID: 26771143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Beef consumer segment profiles based on information source usage in Poland.
    Żakowska-Biemans S; Pieniak Z; Gutkowska K; Wierzbicki J; Cieszyńska K; Sajdakowska M; Kosicka-Gębska M
    Meat Sci; 2017 Feb; 124():105-113. PubMed ID: 27865127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Consumer preference and effect of correct or misleading information after ageing beef longissimus muscle using vacuum, dry ageing, or a dry ageing bag.
    Stenström H; Li X; Hunt MC; Lundström K
    Meat Sci; 2014 Feb; 96(2 Pt A):661-6. PubMed ID: 24200554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Consumer acceptance of dishes in which beef has been partially substituted with mushrooms and sodium has been reduced.
    Guinard JX; Myrdal Miller A; Mills K; Wong T; Lee SM; Sirimuangmoon C; Schaefer SE; Drescher G
    Appetite; 2016 Oct; 105():449-59. PubMed ID: 27317972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consumers' quality perception of national branded, national store branded, and imported store branded beef.
    Banović M; Grunert KG; Barreira MM; Fontes MA
    Meat Sci; 2010 Jan; 84(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 20374754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relationships of consumer sensory ratings, marbling score, and shear force value to consumer acceptance of beef strip loin steaks.
    Platter WJ; Tatum JD; Belk KE; Chapman PL; Scanga JA; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Nov; 81(11):2741-50. PubMed ID: 14601877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sensory characteristics and consumer acceptability of beef stock containing the glutathione-xylose Maillard reaction product and/or monosodium glutamate.
    Hong JH; Kwon KY; Kim KO
    J Food Sci; 2012 Jun; 77(6):S233-9. PubMed ID: 22591448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preferences and acceptance of Czech and Spanish consumers regarding beef with varying intramuscular fat content.
    Fořtová J; Del Mar Campo M; Valenta J; Needham T; Řehák D; Lebedová N; Bartoň L; Klouček P; Bureš D
    Meat Sci; 2022 Oct; 192():108912. PubMed ID: 35863209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Consumer preferences for beef with improved nutrient profile1.
    Flowers S; McFadden BR; Carr CC; Mateescu RG
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Dec; 97(12):4699-4709. PubMed ID: 31628839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Organic and conventional nonflavored yogurts from the Italian market: study on sensory profiles and consumer acceptability.
    Toschi TG; Bendini A; Barbieri S; Valli E; Cezanne ML; Buchecker K; Canavari M
    J Sci Food Agric; 2012 Nov; 92(14):2788-95. PubMed ID: 22473814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of repetitive use of hormonal implants on beef carcass quality, tenderness, and consumer ratings of beef palatability.
    Platter WJ; Tatum JD; Belk KE; Scanga JA; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Apr; 81(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 12723088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Consumer and trained panel evaluation of beef strip steaks of varying marbling and enhancement levels cooked to three degrees of doneness.
    Lucherk LW; O'Quinn TG; Legako JF; Rathmann RJ; Brooks JC; Miller MF
    Meat Sci; 2016 Dec; 122():145-154. PubMed ID: 27544884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Meat the challenge: Segmentation and profiling of Japanese beef mince and its substitutes consumers.
    Washio T; Saijo M; Ito H; Takeda KI; Ohashi T
    Meat Sci; 2023 Mar; 197():109047. PubMed ID: 36469985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Variables affecting the propensity to buy branded beef among groups of Australian beef buyers.
    Morales LE; Griffith G; Wright V; Fleming E; Umberger W; Hoang N
    Meat Sci; 2013 Jun; 94(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 23501257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Japanese consumer categorisation of beef into quality grades, based on Meat Standards Australia methodology.
    Polkinghorne RJ; Nishimura T; Neath KE; Watson R
    Anim Sci J; 2011 Apr; 82(2):325-33. PubMed ID: 21729214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preference mapping of lemon lime carbonated beverages with regular and diet beverage consumers.
    Leksrisompong PP; Lopetcharat K; Guthrie B; Drake MA
    J Food Sci; 2013 Feb; 78(2):S320-8. PubMed ID: 23323610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.