These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Advance directives: the United States experience. Cranford RE Humane Med; 1993 Jan; 9(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 11652943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Lessons from Cruzan. Meisel A J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 2132020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Bringing bioethics theory to the bedside. Bell H Minn Med; 1997 Nov; 80(11):20-5. PubMed ID: 9385809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Choices: the ethics of dying pose new challenges for caregivers. Buss DD Contemp Longterm Care; 1994 Mar; 17(3):40-1, 43, 45-7. PubMed ID: 10132980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical decisionmaking for older adults in institutional settings: is beneficence dead in an age of risk management? Kapp MB Issues Law Med; 1995; 11(1):29-46. PubMed ID: 7635691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Death by default. Lindgren J Law Contemp Probl; 1993; 56(3):185-254. PubMed ID: 10129268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Right to die: public balks at deciding for others. Steiber SR Hospitals; 1987 Mar; 61(5):72. PubMed ID: 3817777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Terminal trajectory: compassion, comfort, and dignity. Bardenilla SS Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):391-401. PubMed ID: 3110099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Why law pervades medicine: an essay on ethics in health care. Scott C Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2000; 14(1):245-303. PubMed ID: 12705270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The aftermath of the Cruzan decision: dying in a twilight zone. Aroskar MA Nurs Outlook; 1990; 38(6):256-7. PubMed ID: 2235533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical considerations in the life of a child with Down syndrome. Pueschel SM Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 2533587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Judges who support the right to die. Epps G US News World Rep; 1997 Jan; 122(1):28, 30-1. PubMed ID: 10164301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Life-support withdrawal: law of commiseration or principle? Byrnes JC Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):331-54. PubMed ID: 11651213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Love and let die. Painton P; Taylor E Time; 1990 Mar; 135(12):62-8, 70-1. PubMed ID: 10104321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Establishing decision making standards for medical treatment to protect the civil rights of handicapped newborns. Glasow SB J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():255-74. PubMed ID: 10317803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. 'Baby Doe'--a medical ethical issue. Lang GC West J Med; 1985 Jun; 142(6):837-41. PubMed ID: 4024642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The significance of the legacy of Karen Ann Quinlan. McIntyre RL Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993; 8(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 8453247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]